Quantcast
Channel: Model Aviation Online Features
Viewing all 1309 articles
Browse latest View live

E-flite Carbon-Z P2 Prometheus BNF

$
0
0


Written by Andrew Griffith
A Pitts biplane evolved
Abridged product review
Photos by the author
Read the full product review in the September 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Bonus video


Specifications

Model type: Semiscale aerobat
Skill level: Intermediate to advanced
Wingspan: 48 inches
Wing area: 840 square inches
Wing loading: 17.8 ounces
Wing cube loading: 7.4
Airfoil: Symmetrical
Length: 49.3 inches
Weight: 7 pounds
Power system: 525 Kv 50-size brushless outrunner motor
Radio: Full-range six-channel DSM2/DSMX radio system
Construction: Z-Foam
Covering/finish: Paint and decals over Z-Foam
Street price: $ 399.99


Test-model details

Motor used: E-flite 50-size brushless motor (included)
Battery: E-flite 6S (22.2-volt) 4,400 mAh LiPo
Propeller: 15 x 5.5 two-blade (included)
Radio system: Spektrum DX-18G2
Ready-to-fly weight: 6 pounds, 8 ounces
Flight duration: Five minutes


Pluses

• Fantastic-looking, detailed color scheme.
• Unique pin system makes wing installation easy.
• Very aerobatic and fun to fly.
• Top hatches for convenient battery and radio system access.


Minus

• Main landing gear fairing didn’t align with fuselage on my model.


Abridged product review

One thing is certain—whether it’s cutting ribbons, racing cars down the runway, or putting on one of his “high octane” aerobatic shows—Skip Stewart knows how to entertain air show crowds with his P-2 Prometheus biplane.

Horizon Hobby teamed up with Skip to make a series of models of his modified series of biplanes. The P3 Revolution is available as both an ultra-micro (UMX) and a 60cc built-up version, and right in the middle is the P2 Prometheus.

The P2 Prometheus comes in two versions, Plug and Play (PNP) or BNF. The difference is that the BNF version includes a factory-installed AR636 AS3X receiver. The BNF version is the subject of this review.

Assembly

I unpacked the model to inspect the parts and sat down with the instruction manual. Despite damage to the outer box by the shipping company—serious enough that I made the delivery driver wait—the packaging is excellent and there was no damage to the aircraft.

In fact, all of the parts are bagged in plastic and secured in an interlocking foam shipping container. All of the preinstalled control horns and other sharp edges that could possibly poke holes in other parts were covered with foam blocks. Unpacking the Prometheus was like taking apart a puzzle box, and it was clear that the packaging was well thought out.

There are a couple of areas that require glue and I used Zap brand thin and medium CA. A Phillips-head screwdriver and CA adhesive are all that you need to assemble the Prometheus. A six-cell battery and a six-channel radio are required if you purchased the BNF version.




All control surfaces use ball links for a slop-free control system. The square elevator joiner, shown here, ensures perfect alignment of the elevator halves. You can also see the carbon-fiber strips embedded in the foam to prevent flexing while under load.




The removable cockpit hatch provides access to the radio compartment to bind the AR636, as well as install the lower wing bolts and aileron servo extensions.



Flying

I noticed that the Prometheus garnered even more than the average amount of attention that a new review model usually gets on a weekend. Several pilots even commented that they were thinking about getting one, but were waiting to see one in person. It seemed the wait was over.

The Prometheus broke ground after approximately 30 feet and accelerated cleanly while climbing with authority.

A few clicks of right trim and a couple of down-elevator inputs were required to get the Prometheus flying level at 3/4 throttle. The wing incidences and the motor thrustlines appear to be well tested because the Prometheus doesn’t climb or descend with power changes.

Checking the CG, I pulled the Prometheus up in a 45° upline, rolled it inverted, and let go of the elevator. The Prometheus arced gracefully toward the ground, meaning it was slightly nose-heavy. If you like a neutral CG, you either have to run a lighter battery or add a small amount of tail weight.

Moving the battery back is possible, but difficult because of the battery strap’s location. The battery would likely end up in the area between the hatches, so it would be difficult to put the strap on even if you moved it back. With all of that stated, it flew well with the CG where it was, so I didn’t mess with it any more.

A stall test was performed from both level flight and with a slightly nose-up attitude. In level flight, I reduced power and added elevator and when the stall broke, the Prometheus fell forward. When the elevator was relaxed and power was added, the Prometheus recovered and resumed flying. With the nose up several degrees and power removed, the Prometheus will drop a wing. Corrective control and power are needed to recover. Keeping this in mind, I will make sure that I don’t flare too early for landing.




The large side area and generous rudder mean that the Prometheus handles knife-edge flight extremely well.


Next, I tested the control response at the recommended rates. As I expected, with four ailerons, the Prometheus is nimble in high rate.

Mid- and low-rates made the Prometheus more docile and although it will still perform large aerobatics and knife-edge in mid-rate, it doesn’t snap or tumble as well.

A biplane has quite a bit of frontal area and that makes for a lot of drag, so it came as no surprise that pulling the power below half meant that the Prometheus would start to descend and some throttle is required to keep it on glide slope.

If you haven’t flown a biplane before, be ready for more throttle during final approach and maintain that until the main wheels are on the ground. This is a higher-performance airplane and is intended for experienced pilots. They shouldn’t have any problems landing the Prometheus.

With each subsequent flight, I had more fun than the one before it because I was getting comfortable with the airplane. Knife-edge pulls slightly to the gear but doesn’t try to roll out, and it does a pretty high-alpha knife-edge pass.

I tried some 3-D flying, and although not its forte, it does do rolling harriers and upright post-stall flying that is more stable than what I expected of the short wings. It has enough power to hover and torque roll with some reserve power for decent pull outs.


Conclusion

Many people love biplanes—they just hate putting them together and taking them apart at the field. The Prometheus flies like a big model, but will easily fit in large vehicles when fully assembled. If you have to break it down, the unique strut pins can quickly be removed and only four screws hold the wings on, so it merely takes a few minutes to assemble or break down the Prometheus.




One of the neatest features of the Prometheus is these L-shaped pins that allow for quick installation or removal of the wing struts.


Large hatches provide easy access to the radio and battery compartments, and the top-mounted battery hatch allows battery swaps with the airplane on its wheels.

The Carbon-Z construction is sturdy and the finish is excellent. Z-Foam is tough and easily repaired with standard CA glue. Although many models replicate the overall scheme of an airplane such as this, E-flite has replicated all of the detailed sponsor logos and markings and the result is a striking model.

In flight, the E-flite P2 Prometheus simply delivers!
—Andrew Griffith
andy@customcutgraphix.com


Manufacturer/Distributor

Horizon Hobby
(800) 338-4639
www.hobbyzonerc.com


Sources

Spektrum
(800) 338-4639
www.spektrumrc.com





Staufenbiel Red Bull F4U-4 Corsair BNF Basic

$
0
0


Written by Terry Dunn
Put on your own air show with this large foam model
Abridged product review
Photos by the author
Read the full product review in the September 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Bonus video


Abridged Product Review

If you’ve never seen a full-scale F4U Corsair perform at an air show, you owe it to yourself to punch that ticket. There are often many impressive aircraft at any given air show. But for me, nothing quite matches the sight, sound, and visceral punch that a Corsair provides.

One shining example of a surviving Corsair is part of the Flying Bulls Collection in Salzburg, Austria.The Flying Bulls’ Corsair is the inspiration for a new RC model by Staufenbiel. This electric-powered aircraft has a 55.6-inch wingspan and all-foam construction. It is a BNF model that includes a Spektrum AR636A receiver with AS3X stabilization.


The Kit

The Staufenbiel Corsair is large for a foamie. All of the airframe components are prepainted and have preapplied decals. A large, 540 Kv E-flite brushless motor is provided to propel the Corsair. It swings a four-blade propeller, which really accentuates the model’s scalelike appearance. An accurately sized pilot bust is included as well.




The Staufenbiel Red Bull F4U-4 Corsair is a large, prefinished foam model. It includes everything except a DSMX-compatible transmitter and a four-cell LiPo battery.


This model requires a four-cell 2,400 to 2,800 mAh LiPo battery. The battery fits into an angled compartment in the fuselage. An E-flite 70-amp ESC links the battery to the motor. The ESC’s built-in switching BEC provides power for the entire radio system.

A large hatch allows access to the battery compartment and some of the radio gear. The radio bay includes a Spektrum AR636A receiver and two 17-gram digital servos. These servos, like all of the others in the model, are not directly attached to the receiver. Instead, they are first connected to a circuit board that is located on a plywood mount above the wing halves.

The ailerons are actuated by another pair of 17-gram servos. A final pair of 17-gram servos is used to manipulate the model’s wing flaps. Electronic retracts are factory mounted in the wing. Like the full-scale Corsair, the wheel axle rotates 90° as the gear retracts or extends. A separate 9-gram servo in each wing panel opens and closes the landing gear bay doors.




A 540 Kv brushless outrunner motor is included and is factory mounted to the airframe.


Assembling the Corsair

Although most of the work is done at the factory, there are still several important finishing steps that need to be completed. Resist the temptation to breeze through these tasks. The Corsair is a large, powerful model that requires thoughtful preparation to ensure success. Plan to spend an evening or two to get things right.

I linked the included AR636A receiver to my Spektrum DX8 transmitter. The manual provides suggested control throws, which I followed. I also added 30% exponential to the ailerons, elevator, and rudder.

I initially used an E-flite 4S 2,800 mAh 30C LiPo battery. With this pack located in the battery slot, the model balanced approximately 1/4 inch forward of the suggested center of gravity (CG) location. I flew the maiden flight with the forward CG and quickly wished I hadn’t. I suggest that you stick with the recommended CG.

To get the CG where it should be, I moved the ESC from the motor cowling to the radio bay. I also added a hook-and-loop strap behind the battery slot. This allowed me to locate the battery farther aft. The strap also lets me use a variety of batteries while still maintaining the correct CG.




To get the correct CG, I moved the ESC to the radio bay and added a hook-and-loop strap to mount the battery outside of its molded pocket. Note the green circuit board through which all of the servo leads are routed.




The wires coming from the wing halves are consolidated into a pair of six-pin plugs. This makes installing and removing the wing halves easy.


Flying the Corsair

It might be a foamie, but the completed Corsair is a large and impressive model. It looks good sitting on the tarmac, but it looks even better in the air!

I like to hold a tad of up-elevator as I begin the takeoff roll. This prevents the nose from pointing down as the tail wheel lifts and the airplane is rolling on the main wheels. The Corsair quickly builds speed and is usually airborne before I hit full throttle.

As soon as the model is flying, I begin retracting the landing gear. It has a slow, scalelike movement. The autosequencing gear doors are also a nice touch. It takes roughly 10 seconds for all of the movement to be completed. Keep this in mind if you ever have to make a sudden emergency landing. You may be better off keeping the gear retracted than landing with it partially deployed.

The Corsair likes to be flown with a lot of power. The suggested control rates work well for large, warbird-style aerobatics. I typically use high-rate throws for the entire flight. Aileron rolls are quick and axial. When you relax the controls, the Corsair instantly ceases rolling. That behavior is a product of the AS3X stabilization built into the receiver. This model really shines when making fast, low photo passes. It looks great humming over the runway in a gentle banking turn. Although the model isn’t blazingly fast, it is reasonably speedy.

I like to land on the main wheels and let the tail wheel settle on its own. If there is a breeze of 5 mph or more down the runway, I am apt to land without flaps. I reserve the flaps for those light wind days. In either case, the Corsair is well behaved on approach and presents no real challenges for landing.




The Corsair likes to be flown fast. It excels at large, smooth maneuvers.


Conclusion

The Staufenbiel Red Bull F4U-4 Corsair has much of the same presence and appeal of the iconic full-scale warbird. Although assembly requires a few tweaks to get things right, the effort is definitely worthwhile. It is a big and powerful model that looks great on the ground and in the air.

—Terry Dunn
terrydunn74@gmail.com

Manufacturer/Distributor

Staufenbiel/Horizon Hobby
(800) 338-4639
www.modellhobby.de
www.horizonhobby.com


Sources

Spektrum
(800) 338-4639
www.spektrumrc.com

The Flying Bulls
www.flyingbulls.at/en




44th Annual Mint Julep

$
0
0


Written by Stan Alexander
A family affair
Event coverage
Photos by the author
As seen in the September 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Bonus photos

Model Aviation Magazine - Mint Julep 2016


Event Coverage

For 44 years now, the Mint Julep Scale Meet has signaled the start of contest season in the Midwest. Held at its longtime location at the Rough River Dam State Resort Park in Falls of Rough, Kentucky, the Mint, as many know it, once again provided a high degree of Scale competition. But more importantly, the friendships made throughout the years make it seem much more like a family affair.

For one family, Dale and Mary Arvin, their son, Jeremy, and the rest of the Arvin clan, this is an annual get-together that nobody misses. The event has long been held by the Southern Indiana R/C Modelers, but this year, the National Association of Scale Aeromodelers (NASA) took the reins, with Dale and Jeremy serving as the contest directors.




(L-R) Jeremy, Mary, and Dale Arvin have attended the last 44 Mint Julep contests!


Modelers came from across the eastern US for the May 20-22 event. With a smooth, full-scale, paved runway, models from .40-size all the way up to the 171-inch wingspan Cessna 152 were easy to handle on the asphalt. Static judging took place on Friday before the flying started on Saturday morning. A weather front rolled in on Friday, and Saturday was cool at best. We only flew one round of competition.




Al Kretz’s Stormovik placed second in Designer Scale. This was taken during the bomb drop maneuver.




David Hale’s Balsa USA 1/3-scale Nieuport 17 came in fourth in Fun Scale Novice.


The Saturday night banquet was held at a local hotel restaurant with a great assortment of food and drink. We were all having a good time with the host and emcee, Dale Arvin, who added to the evening with his “bag of fun” for everyone.
It’s a family affair with many modelers bringing their spouses and kids. Birthdays, anniversaries, and other times are all celebrated during the event. Great times for all!

With only one round flown on Saturday because of the weather, we started flying promptly at 8:30 a.m. on Sunday and put in three rounds of competition. The weather couldn’t have been better—sunny and 75° with the wind down the runway most of the day.




Competitors generally help one another. Mark Radcliff (R) listens to his caller, Evan Gaston, who finished less than a point behind Mark in Fun Scale Open.




Blake Neumann’s Ryan started life as an RC Guys ARF. Blake completely refinished the model.




Matt Hanson’s Grumman TBF Avenger was built from a Skyshark Hobbies kit.


At a contest such as this, you can bring any Scale airplane or jet and enjoy practice flying on Friday, and then fly in the competition on Saturday and Sunday. Maneuvers are simple; the takeoff, flyby, Figure Eight, landing, and realism are the only required ones. Add to this list five maneuvers of your choice, and you have your model’s flight program.

This contest is also a qualifying contest for the fall NASA Scale Classic, held just west of Pittsburgh.

The winners of this year’s Mint Julep include Jeff Pike with his Cub in Team Scale; Carl Handley with his P-47 in Fun Scale Novice; Jeremy Arvin flying his Top Flite Corsair in Fun Scale Open (most entries); Bob Patton with his Cessna 152 in Designer Scale; Mike Barbee with his T-34B in Expert; Art Shelton in Expert B class; and Mike Wartman with a much-modified Top Flite P-47 in Sportsman.




Jeff Pike’s J-3 Cub was awarded first in Team Scale.




Jeremy Arvin, along with his dad (R), prepares for another flight with his winning Top Flite Corsair in Fun Scale Open.




Mark Radcliff’s Cessna Aerobat 152 was entered in Fun Scale. Mark, the AMA District III vice president, had a great time during the weekend. His model is a Seagull ARF.




Blake Neumann (L) received the Bob Lirette Flight Achievement Award from Dale Arvin.
The winner of this award is decided by a vote of the contest flight judges.




Jim Neal’s Christen Eagle finished first in Fun Scale Aerobatics.


The high static score at this year’s event went to Al Kretz in Open Scale. His Fokker D.VII had a score of 98.88.

Next year’s event will take place in May.

—Stan Alexander
onawing4602@att.net


Sponsors

• National Association of Scale Aeromodelers
• Great Planes Model Manufacturing Company
• Rough River Dam State Resort Park
• Sig Manufacturing Company, Inc.
• Kentucky Department of Parks
• Model Airplane News
• Bob Smith Industries
• Tru-Turn Products
• Sullivan Products
• APC Propellers
• Airborne Media
• RTL Fasteners
• Frank Tiano
• Excel Hobby
• Zona Tool
• Zap Glue


Sources

Mint Julep
www.facebook.com/events/1517223745245766

NASA
www.nasascale.org

Rough River Dam State Park
http://parks.ky.gov/parks/resortparks/rough-river

Delivering Hope

$
0
0


Written by Rachelle Haughn
AMA member builds aircraft that save lives
Photos provided by Zipline and Ronnie Romiti
As seen in the September 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Bonus video



“I just wanted to do something more fulfilling and things kind of fell into place.”

Some people have desk jobs, some punch a time clock each day, and others work the night shift. At some point in life, people might wonder what purpose their jobs have in the greater scheme of things. In addition to earning a paycheck, are they making the world a better place? Even more important, are they changing lives?

Longtime AMA member Ronnie Romiti, quoted above, no longer has to wonder what his answer to these questions would be. Not only is he able to apply the skills he learned through aeromodeling at work, he has a part in potentially saving the lives of people he’s never met. These men, women, and children live in remote areas of Rwanda, where delivering medical supplies to the sick and injured can be time-consuming and treacherous.

The new delivery method for such supplies might not be what you would expect. Since July of this year, life-saving blood, vaccines, and medications are being delivered by an 8-foot electric-powered airplane with whimsical painted-on eyes, affectionately named Zip.




A Zip aircraft in the final stages of its assembly. These twin-motor airplanes are designed to carry a payload of up to 3.5 pounds and travel 80 miles roundtrip without needing a battery change.


This autonomous aircraft follows a predetermined flight path that takes it to a remote medical center. When it reaches the medical facility, a box of supplies that is attached to a paper parachute is released from the airplane and lands in a designated safe zone. The aircraft then returns to the location from which it was launched.

“It’s very exciting,” Ronnie stated about working for Zipline, located off the California coast. “Every day is something new. We have a new problem to solve every day. Being in a startup [company] is extremely fast-paced.” In April, shortly after the company was announced to the public, Ronnie said he and his coworkers were concentrating on getting the Zipline to land in a smaller area that is roughly the size of a parking space.

Keller Rinaudo, cofounder of Zipline, said he decided to hire Ronnie because of his unique skillset as an aeromodeler. “Ronnie has been building planes his whole life, so he has an amazing ability to improvise and just make things work in order to move fast to get vehicles flying fast. He’s a master prototyper, and has been involved in every single new airframe we’ve built as a company,” Keller said. “Ronnie is also an insanely talented test pilot, and was able to safely fly and land early prototypes of planes when no other pilots on the planet could.”

When lifetime California resident Ronnie started working for the company in February 2015, he was the only employee with aeromodeling experience. Many of Ronnie’s coworkers at Zipline earned degrees at Harvard University, Stanford University, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and had worked for companies such as Google X, SpaceX, and Lockheed Martin.

“I was very intimidated at first, but they are very nice to me. As much as they’re book smart … they still have a lot to learn about RC planes,” Ronnie stated about his coworkers. “We’re learning from each other.”

Ronnie heard about the job opening through his aeromodeling club. When he applied for the position, he sent the company photos of aircraft he had built from kits and from plans. Because Zipline had not yet been publicly announced, when Ronnie went to the job interview he had to sign a nondisclosure agreement and meet company officials at a secret location. He brought along a Yellow Aircraft F-18 jet model that he had built, which seemed to make an impression.




Ronnie Romiti’s experience in building model aircraft is one of the reasons why he was hired to work for Zipline. This Yellow Aircraft Twin F-18 is one of the jets that he has built and flies.


Before accepting the position, Ronnie had run his own construction company for many years. He applied for the job at Zipline because he felt like something was missing. That “something” has been fulfilled by Zipline.

One of the first things that Ronnie had to teach his new coworkers was how to safely fly model aircraft. These lessons are the same ones that he learned more than 20 years ago when he began learning how to fly jets, Giant Scale electric-powered warbirds, and helicopters at a model aircraft club field. The safety tips that he gave his coworkers included the importance of establishing a flightline, to always fly with a spotter, and that they should never fly above people.

Ronnie immediately dove into helping design a twin-motor aircraft that could carry a payload of up to 3.5 pounds, fly 80 miles roundtrip without changing the battery, and safely drop a box from 40 feet above ground.

The aircraft he helped fine-tune weighs 22 pounds, can fly up to 60 mph, is safe to catch by hand, and is launched from a compressed-air catapult mechanism. “I wish I could tell people about the recovery system,” Ronnie commented. “It’s very cool!”

In the developing stages, Zipline considered using quadcopters to deliver the medical supplies. Ronnie said these aircraft were candidates because they are readily available. The company soon realized the downside. “They’re much more difficult to make waterproof,” he said of multirotors. “They also don’t have the endurance for the range that we need,” he said, speaking in terms of battery power.




A Zip aircraft is ready to be launched by a large compressed-air catapult mechanism. The flight testing for the aircraft and launching system was done along the California coast.


“A lot of development went into making those airplanes waterproof,” Ronnie stated about the Zips (which also have been called fixed-wing drones—a term that he does not like). The aircraft had to be built to fly in strong wind at high altitudes. The higher the airplane must travel, the more battery power is used, he explained.

Rwanda has unmanned aircraft regulations that are similar to those in the US. These include requiring unmanned models to be flown within line of sight. The Rwandan government, however, has made an exemption for Zipline. The Zips’ routes will be in areas that are designated as no-fly zones for other aircraft.




The autonomous Zip aircraft will have a set flight path, such as this one, that will be used to deliver medical supplies to clinics in Rwanda. The Rwandan government has made an exemption for Zipline to fly its aircraft in no-fly zones.


When Ronnie was first hired by Zipline, he was tasked with writing instructions for how to build the Zips, teaching others how to build and fly them, testing the motors and controls, and helping decide what components would be put into the aircraft. Ronnie said it was an honor to be an “RC guy” who was part of the company’s brainstorming sessions. “I’ve seen a lot of my ideas go into the [airframe],” he said.

Before the first Zip made its maiden flight in Rwanda, Ronnie was busy building as many airplanes as possible. “The goal we are working up to is [to have] 50 to 150 flights per day, 15 planes [flying] a day, and a whole lot of batteries,” Ronnie commented. He is also the Zipline’s safety pilot and watches how the airplanes behave in flight.

When Ronnie emailed Model Aviation about his new job, which he clearly loves, he wrote the following:


Ronnie enjoys having a career that allows him to build and test aircraft that could potentially save lives.

“Not only have I had the chance to do what I love, but I also have a chance to show the world that UAVs/drones can be used to do good, and to use my skills to save lives. Every day I see bad press for drones and worry about the result to the hobby I love. Taking this job was my way of trying to change the negative outlook and help in some small way to make it positive.”



The positive is definitely the work that Zipline is doing in Rwanda, which Keller hopes will soon expand to other countries.

“These supply chain challenges are not unique to Africa, and actually exist in countries around the planet. Our goal is to roll out Zipline systems in all of those countries to revolutionize how we deliver medical care to people who live in rural or remote locations,” Keller said.



“Zipline will ultimately allow the Rwandan government to put each and every one of the 11 million citizens of Rwanda within a 10- to 45-minute delivery of any essential medical product they could need.”

When the aircraft were ready to be launched, Zipline’s focus moved to Rwanda, and some of its employees were stationed there to get everything set up and running. “Our nest will be located close to a regional medical center there, just down the street from us,” Ronnie explained in April. “We will have a cold chain to keep the blood cool.”

The medical supplies come from the regional medical center, and then are sent out via Zip to other medical clinics and centers. Currently, motorcycles can navigate some of the rocky terrain, but Rwanda’s rainy season sometimes washes away roads with poor infrastructure, making them impassible for a motor vehicle. Delivering medical supplies via a motorcycle can take several days, Ronnie explained.

With the help of Will Hetzler and Keenan Wyrobek, Keller has built Zipline into what it is today. Will was his roommate at Harvard for three years, and he met Keenan through a mutual acquaintance in 2014. Keller explained how the idea for Zipline, which was formed in 2011, came about.

“We were spending time in several different countries in Africa, and realized that with the advent of cellphones, it’s now possible for doctors and health centers to text into a central system when they have a patient whose life is in danger, but they don’t have the medical product they need to help that person.

“But the other half of that system doesn’t exist. It’s not possible for the existing medical supply chain to respond quickly, even when they have the product that person needs. So we wanted to build that half of the system, and make it possible for countries to respond to emergencies quickly and efficiently, even when a patient lives in a remote or hard-to-reach location.”




Some of Ronnie’s coworkers earned degrees at prestigious universities, but had never flown a model aircraft. He was honored to be able to teach them how to fly.


In Rwanda, text messages are sent to the regional medical center near Zipline’s base. The requested medical supplies are then taken to Zipline to be delivered.

In 2010, approximately 58,000 women across Eastern and Southern Africa died during pregnancy and childbirth. The number of such deaths has slightly declined in the past few years, but getting more women access to the emergency care that they need is tricky in Eastern Africa. This is especially true in Rwanda, where the leading cause of maternal death is blood loss, according to a study by UNICEF.

In addition to mothers, children in Rwanda might no longer die from from malaria. Vaccines for malaria will be delivered by Zips, Ronnie said. “Which is just crazy because [malaria is] totally preventable,” he added. “They just don’t have the medicine.”

Ronnie said in April that he preferred to stay in California when the work in Rwanda began, but believed that he would be sent there for a short while. “I really hope that we’ll be a big success in Rwanda.”

In his email to Model Aviation, Ronnie summed up the reason that he decided to share his story.



“I’m sure it won’t change everyone’s outlook overnight, but seeing drones used to save lives all around the world might have an impact. It’s been an amazing journey to this point and only promises to get better—a dream come true for a guy who just loves Remote Control planes.




Zip airplanes have a hatch that opens underneath and releases a box of medical supplies that parachutes to the ground. The 22-pound Zip aircraft can fly up to 60 mph and are safe to catch by hand.


“I wanted to share the news to help spread the positive outlook for the future, at a time when we hear so much negative, and also to give hope to other hobbyist that dreams can come true. I have discovered that the old saying [about] when you do what you love, you never work a day of your life, is completely true!”

—Rachelle Haughn
rachelleh@modelaircraft.org


Sources

Zipline
http://flyzipline.com/product

Zipline video
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnDpE8uSb7M




AMA News: District 9 - September 2016

$
0
0


Written by Austin Axmann / Rick McCaskill / Jim Tiller
Camp AMA scholarship recipient, Western States Drone Rodeo, and 2016 Warbirds over Denver
As seen in the September 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Here’s a picture and a few words from Austin Axmann, our third recipient of a scholarship to Camp AMA, thanks to your generous donations.





“Camp AMA was nothing but amazing. Everyone that was there was nice and willing to help. On the first day there was a midair and about six other crashes. There were other wrecks during the week, but not near as many as the first day.

“There were so many good things that came out of the camp. Many friends made and many planes learned about. I think the best night was when we were night flying. The pilots were great and the environment was beautiful (minus the cold). I can say that it was one of the most enjoyable weeks of my life. The experience was not comparable to anything I have done before.

“Special thanks to Troy Hamm and the RC Barnstomers for nominating me and to all that helped me go to Camp AMA.”



Circumstances would not allow me to attend the Drone Rodeo in Casper, Wyoming. Rick McCaskill, Colorado associate vice president (AVP), attended in my place and here’s his report.

The Casper Air Modelers (CAM) hosted the Western States Drone Rodeo at the club’s facility on June 18, 2016. This was the first FPV Rodeo, but the Air Modelers members hope it becomes an annual event.

CAM President Jeff Nelson said, “A big part of what we will do is show people that drone use by responsible pilots is fun and safe. We showcase the good things and want to get people involved with the recreational side.”

The setup included an FPV racingdrone layout, and an obstacle course featuring pylons and arches through which the drones flew.

Three drones at a time raced through the courses. We clocked 86 mph on one pass down the 400-foot straightaway. A big screen TV allowed the spectators to view the FPV of each competitor. There is video of the race below.


Bonus video




Casper Drone Rodeo racers (L-R) Chris Cohron; George Bob Hine; second-place winner Quentin Weiss; third-place winner Richard Sankey; Charles F. Thompson; Justin Webster; and Josh Nelson. First-place winner Greg Fleming is not pictured.


Thank you, Josh, and the members of the CAM for hosting this event and letting me take part. I was impressed by your city-owned facility and your great relationship with the Casper community. This was a great event to attend, and I met many of the club members and spectators. I hope I get a chance to attend again next year.



On June 11, 2016, I was able to spend the day at the annual Warbirds Over Denver event hosted by the Jefco Aeromod’lers. This year, as in most years, scores of pilots were registered. What a treat to see all of the great military stuff and watch it fly. Where else are you going to see an A-12 Shrike and a Nakajima B5N Kate torpedo bomber in the same pattern?

This year, Pete Thompson, club president, and the Jefco crew allowed me to use this event to host our annual District IX membership meeting. In the course of the day, I had the opportunity to chair a discussion with the assembled AMA members. At the conclusion of our meeting, Darrell Weidman won the drawing for a new Spektrum DX8 radio. Darrell is a deserving winner. He is he is a longtime Jefco Aeromod’ler and a committed volunteer for the warbirds event.




Jim Tiller presents Darrell Weidman with a new Spektrum DX8 radio at the District IX membership meeting. Colorado AVP Rick McCaskill assists.



Young Justin Brown, of Canon City CO, asked me if I would put his picture in the magazine. After being amazed by his knowledge of warbirds, military history, and his enthusiasm for this hobby, I gladly obliged.


Lots of great flying, good food, and great camaraderie are the hallmarks of this laid-back, longtime event. I hope I will get a chance to come back next year.

Thanks also to Colorado AVP Rick McCaskill for providing logistical assistance and helping out with the District IX meeting.




AMA News: District 10 - September 2016

$
0
0


Written by Jim Mohan / Lawrence Tougas
12th Annual Arizona Electric Festival
As seen in the September 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Bonus Photos

Model Aviation Magazine - September 2016 AMA News District X Bonus Photos



Superstition Airpark sits in the shadow of the Superstition Mountains of Lost Dutchman Gold Mine fame. Although no one found lost gold, more than 90 registered pilots and hundreds of spectators struck RC gold at the 12th Annual 2016 Arizona Electric Festival (AEF). Contest Director (CD) Shannon Gallagher, assistant CD Pat Gagnon, and their team executed an outstanding event.

The Arizona Model Aviators’ field includes an 800-foot asphalt runway with plenty of paved tarmac for airplane parking. A 250-foot long ramada provides plenty of space for airplane setup and congregating to examine others’ model configurations, new airplanes, and gadgets. With food service and generator-provided electricity to the wired ramada, the site is perfect for this event.




CD Shannon Gallagher and assistant CD Pat Gagnon conduct the morning pilots’ briefing.


Each morning, the tarmac filled with hundreds of electric-powered models of almost every shape, size, and description. After the daily pilots’ briefing, the flightline was full. While busy, lines for the flight stations were short. All who wanted to fly had ample opportunity.

The Saturday noontime show included a warbird gaggle, a 70mm or smaller jet gaggle, a helicopter speed demo, and demo flights from several of the vendors that had set up displays in the vendor area. A couple of models drew plenty of attention.

Clark Hans had several large scratch-built foam models. His Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow stood taller than he does!

It is powered by a pair of 90-millimeter ducted fans, each powered by a 10-cell battery pack. It was built from a combination of both pink and blue foam. It turned a lot of heads as it streaked by. Clark also had a large Concorde model powered by a pair of pusher propeller setups.




Clark Hans and his giant scratch-built Avro Arrow.


The owner-pilot team of Dale McCawley and George Kreyling flew a massive B-17 scratch-built from Bob Holman plans. The fully sheeted model is powered by four Power 46 electric motors from Horizon Hobby. The presence of this model, both on the ground and in the air, is impressive. With full-scale B-17s occasionally flying over the Phoenix area, it would be easy to do a double-take, mixing up this fine model with its full-scale counterpart.




Owner Dale McCawley and pilot George Kreyling prepare Dale’s Giant B-17 for flight.


Chris Picknally flew a couple of nice models. His foam Grob G 120TP trainer was a nice representation of the full-scale version. Powered by a four-cell battery and an FMS 4250 motor, the Grob 120 was a great-looking, snappy performer. Chris also flew a beautiful 90mm ducted-fan version of a Hawker Hunter. Done in Swiss yellow and brown tiger stripes, the large 1950s-era jet turned more than a few heads as it flew by.




Chris Picknally returns his Hawker Hunter to the pits after a successful flight.


Jerry Festa had a couple of models he’d recently reviewed online. He had a blast with the Tower Hobbies Wilga 2000 from Origin Hobby and the new Flyzone Seawind EP. One of his Wilga 2000 flights was done almost entirely with the flaps down. He demonstrated the excellent slow flight characteristics and the outstanding short field takeoff and landing capabilities of the little blue high-wing airplane. This captures just a few of the aircraft on the tarmac.




Jerry Festa and his crewman ready the Wilga 2000 for flight.


The Arizona Electric Festival is primarily a fun-fly. This year, as in years past, it has drawn people from across the Southwest. If you’re looking for fun, flying, and fellowship with lots of great models and an excellent site, you need to put the 2017 AEF on your calendar.



My thanks to Jim Mohan for this month’s column. Until next time, I wish you nothing but happy landings.




Joe Nall 2016

$
0
0


Written by Mike Hurley
A people meet with airplanes
Event coverage
Photos by the author
As seen in the September 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Bonus photos

Model Aviation Magazine - Joe Nall Week 2016


Bonus video


The entire week, while visiting the Triple Tree Aerodrome near Woodruff, South Carolina, I kept asking myself, “How would I describe the Joe Nall experience?” It nearly defies description. It can be laid out in a few words and stats, but does that adequately describe the event? One thing is certain, Joe Nall Week has evolved into a unique RC gathering that crosses boundaries as no other event does.

Not only do enthusiasts from nearly every segment of flying participate, but other RC disciplines such as cars and boats show up in certain areas of the more than 400-acre site. While I was there I saw sailplanes, warbirds, helicopters, scale helis, sport jets, scale jets, military jets, corporate jets, commercial jets, scale airplanes, sport airplanes, turboprops, aerobatic aircraft, 3-D airplanes, float airplanes, Control Line (CL) models, electric, gas, glow, and turbine engines—engines of so many configurations that I couldn’t possibly name them all.

The event started, as most do, in a very humble way. It was a local Giant Scale fly-in, put on by two friends who shared their love for model aviation. The first meet was in 1983. Pat Hartness hosted the event at his personal flying site and Joe Nall ran the event. Joe continued to emcee the event until he died in a tragic airplane accident in 1989. In 1990, the event was renamed the Joe Nall Fly-In. Today it’s known as Joe Nall Week.

The event has grown exponentially since its inception in 1983. Each year, Pat adds to or improves the flying site. There are now at least five separate flightlines, including the main flightline, the pond for float flying, an electric-only field and a 3-D electric field, along with the wild and crazy Giant Scale 3-D line. There’s also an area with three CL circles and a helicopter and multirotor flightline. This year there was a special FPV obstacle course.

Camping, RV spaces, and facilities also seem to expand every year. A few years ago, showers and a gazebo were added at the 3-D line, and then later a charging station was constructed near the electric line. This year, the crew built small pilot stations that jut out into the pond for better access to float airplanes.




With more than 400 acres of space, there are five RC flightlines to choose from at the Triple Tree venue, including a huge pond for float flying. This year, small separate pilot station jetties were added to aid in launching and retrieving watercraft.


A new building is going up that will house a learning center with full-scale and RC flight simulators and other educational facilities. This year, the vendor row was unified in a central location, making RC shopping much more convenient for those who come to the event just for that.

I love coming here to buy airplanes and equipment because this is the one place where you can see, and even test, equipment firsthand from a number of manufacturers, including Giant Scale airplanes that most local stores can’t have in stock. I got to test-fly a 35% Extreme Flight Yak 54 on the 3-D flightline.

I’m not sure if anybody has researched large RC flying events, but I’d guess it’s safe to say that Joe Nall Week has become the world’s largest RC event. According to the staff at Triple Tree, there were more than 1,700 registered pilots at this year’s event, held May 7-14. Along with spectators, friends, and not counting the crew and workers, more than 13,300 people came through the gates.

I don’t know how many aircraft were there, but because every pilot seemed to bring two or more, I’d estimate the number is well into the thousands. Pilots came from 42 states and nine countries, and at any one time there could be as many as 40 aircraft in the air. I’ll bet that no one saw that coming back in 1983!

These statistics are interesting, but they don’t begin to give you the feel of attending the Joe Nall Week. As I walk from flightline to flightline, I continue to wonder how to describe the event. There are hundreds of people here from disciplines that would not normally be seen flying together, yet everybody is getting along famously and enjoying each other’s company.




Austrian champion Gernot Bruckmann flew an aerotow-launched scale sailplane during the noon demonstrations. Gernot has a retail RC dealership based in Austria.




In addition to the RC flightlines, there were three CL circles at Triple Tree. There is where we met 8-year-old Layla Barry from Grovetown GA, flying with her dad. Layla has been flying CL since she was 3 years old. Anyone could take a demo flight on a CL airplane, and both the author and his wife gave it a go.


The main flightline is crowded with canopies packed together leg to leg, and everybody’s happy to have you set up beside him or her. I wasn’t there early in the week so I had to set up my space behind another pilot. When I arrived, I asked if he would mind if we joined them and by the end of the week I was good friends with all of those around us; this starts to hint at what the Joe Nall event is.

There are so many people here. All of them have a story, and all of them have a gift—some of them have the gift of piloting skills, others are builders, and all are modelers and enthusiasts. That itself is a gift.

Some of the more notable pilots or aircraft owners were asked to put on a show at the main flightline each day at noon. I was able to watch parts of the shows on three of the days. The performances were surprising and many were downright astounding. The noon demos at Joe Nall Week will remind you that even in a hobby you’ve been involved in for years, you still haven’t seen it all.




Each day at noon, the main flightline is closed for demonstration flights and huge crowds gather behind the pit area. Top pilots from around the world come to Joe Nall Week to be a part of the noon demos. Many of these pilots represent manufacturers and are here to show their products, some come to debut new innovations, and others demonstrate extraordinary skill levels.




The Jeti USA Girl Flight Team showcased two young women, Aneta Bouskova and Ashleigh Heath, flying 3-D aerobatics. Each day crowds gathered around the main flightline at noon to watch professional teams, pilots, and manufacturers demonstrate their skills and their products.


Every year, those on the cutting edge of our hobby continue to push boundaries and defy what we previously thought were limits of flight and performance, and it’s all here to see firsthand at Joe Nall Week.

One of those pioneering people is RC Aerobatics World Champion, TOC Champion, aircraft designer, and innovator, Quique Somenzini. Quique is part of a new company called Flex Innovations that brings new aircraft, electronics, and flight systems to the RC hobby. Quique demonstrated Flex’s new F-16QQ 3-D turbine jet that has been highly specialized with extreme light weight, a high-angle, thrust-vectoring nozzle, extreme control throws, and more design features to create a jet that performs precision, high-alpha, and post-stall maneuvers as never before. Quique’s performance was nothing short of pushing the known flight envelope into new territory. What would you expect from the man who many credit with inventing 3-D flight?




On the left is the man responsible for creating the Triple Tree Aerodrome and the Joe Nall event, Pat Hartness. Pat congratulates world-renowned pilot and aircraft designer Quique Somenzini after another cutting-edge demonstration flight.


During the past eight years, the Joe Nall event has hosted a public building project called the Valkyrie, based on the 1937 Carl Goldberg model of the same name. The build was set up in Pat Hartness’ personal hangar and only took place during Joe Nall Week. Anyone attending the event was invited to sit down and work on the airplane. More than 1,000 people helped in the build. In fact, I helped build a couple of wing ribs two years ago and I’m sure that a good many of you reading this have also pitched in on the project.

The giant Valkyrie flew in Thursday’s noon demo in graceful style and has been a complete success. Next year, Pat wants to fly the Valkyrie for 48 hours during the Joe Nall event with the idea of soaring during the day and using gasoline at night. He is looking for engineering help to design the needed propulsion system. If you think you can help make this happen, contact the staff at the Triple Tree Aerodrome.




This year saw a flight of the public-built scaled-up giant Valkyrie, based on a 1937 Carl Goldberg design. This aircraft was built during an eight-year span by attendees of the Joe Nall event and completed in 2015. The electric-powered Valkyrie has a 20-foot wingspan.


Two other demos that helped me define Joe Nall Week were a turbine-powered, 5-meter sailplane that could reach 200 mph and perform amazing precision aerobatic maneuvers, and the Legendary Fighters, a nine-member team of warbird enthusiasts that traveled from Germany to perform a precision choreographed team flight with World War II aircraft from many of the war’s combatants.




This year, it seemed that many of the noon demonstrations featured team formation flying or coordinated performances. These two giant 42% Extras were flown by Gernot Bruckmann and Markus Rummer. One aircraft is gas powered and the other electric.





Giant Scale takes on another dimension with this 14-foot-long Airworld Models F-104 Starfighter flown by Ali Machinchy. Ali works for Horizon Hobby and is one of the premier demonstration pilots at Joe Nall Week. The aircraft was built by Trond Hammerstad from Norway and uses a single BF-Turbines B300F turbine.


Aside from the talent invited to perform the demos were untold numbers of brilliant attendees, from the man pitting next to me with mind-boggling, complex, cutting-edge computer systems designed to automatically trim his airplane under every circumstance, to 14-year-old Kobe Cantin on the 3-D flightline, who flew with grace, skill, and maturity well beyond his years, to designer/builder Chuck Gratner who designed and scratch-built his own vision of the quintessential 1930s-era Golden Age air racer that he named the Riley Model B.




This is one of two stunning, hand-built aircraft that came from the mind and skilled hands of Chuck Gratner. The design is a mixture of Chuck’s favorite Golden Age aircraft that he dubbed the Riley Model B.


Joe Nall Week is, as you might gather, a huge event with something amazing happening along the flightlines all day and night. I certainly couldn’t see it all, or even report a small fraction of it, but I can tell you that as my wife and I sat on the lawn outside of the hangar during the barbecue dinner, listening to a live jazz concert and watching the sun set while surrounded by 1,000 or so of our fellow modelers, we both looked at each other and said, “We must be livin’ right because this is just about as good as it gets.”

Even with all of these stories, and the stats, and the enormity of it all, the Joe Nall event is hard to describe. But on Friday, the event’s emcee and rambling “Mouth of the South,” Bob Sadler, wrapped it up nicely in his description of Joe Nall Week. He said, “It’s not an airplane meet. It’s a people meet that just happens to have airplanes.”

—Mike Hurley
mhurley222@twc.com


Support the vision

In 2011, Pat Hartness placed the Triple Tree Aerodrome in Woodruff, South Carolina, in a 501(c)(3) trust to ensure that it will be enjoyed by aviators for decades to come. It is now controlled by a board of trustees, and Pat’s vision to “Ignite and Expand the Passion for Aviation” will endure. The Triple Tree Aerodrome will forever be a versatile, diverse, and beautiful aviation site for model and full-scale aircraft alike.

You don’t have to be a pilot to appreciate the Triple Tree Aerodrome. It now supports youth programs and a learning center complete with simulators (both full-scale and RC) where people of all ages can learn more about aviation.

However, with all of these amenities comes some responsibility. Nearly all of the efforts to maintain Triple Tree are on a volunteer basis. The facility has
only one paid employee. Funds for the operating expense and improvements come from donations and proceeds from events held at Triple Tree.

To meet the site’s financial obligations and improvements is an ongoing responsibility. How much do you think it costs annually to maintain the fantastic 450-acre site? It is approximately $300,000 a year. Utilities average $24,000, insurance is another $16,000, the fuel bill is roughly $13,000, and seed, fertilizer, and sod are approximately $37,000.

These figures don’t include equipment maintenance, equipment replacement, upgrades, and myriad miscellaneous expenses that add up to roughly
$200,000 per year. Extraordinary expenditures such as the new Education Center are an additional expenditure.

The Triple Tree Aerodrome has been fortunate to have generous, wealthy donors, but everyone who enjoys and appreciates
this first-class aviation facility is
urged to help and we have strength in our numbers. If each of us donates something—anything—it would be a huge boost to Triple Tree’s continued development and longevity.

Donations can be made online at http://www.tripletreeaerodrome.com/support-the-vision.php, or you can send a tax-deductible donation directly to Gene Strozier, the treasurer of the 501(c)(3), at Triple Tree Aerodrome, 330 Mary
Hanna Rd., Woodruff SC 29388.

—Jim Hullhorst
oldrcflier@aol.com


Sources

Joe Nall
www.tripletreeaerodrome.com

Riley Model B
www.gratnerbrothers.com

GB-Models
www.gb-models.com

Flex Innovations
(866) 310-3538
www.flexinnovations.com




MA Construction Series - Build a Messerschmitt Bf 109

$
0
0


Written by Paul Kohlmann
Photos by the author
As seen in the September 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.




Download the free plans!

Full-size plans
Click here for page 1 of the full-size plans (44" x 34")
Click here for page 2 of the full-size plans (44" x 34")

Tiled plans (8.5 x 11" pages)
Click here for page 1 of the tiled plans (24 sheets at 8.5x11")
Click here for page 2 of the tiled plans (24 sheets at 8.5x11")


Construction Article

When introduced in 1935, Willy Messerschmitt’s Bf 109 was nothing short of revolutionary. Luftwaffe pilots were initially wary of the high wing loading, the side-hinged canopy, and the narrow track of the
landing gear.

Some of their fears were well founded. For instance, the landing gear arrangement that greatly simplified manufacturing and maintenance also contributed to thousands of accidents. But after pilots such as Ernst Udet embraced the little hot rod, the Bf 109 began shattering speed and agility records at the great prewar air meets of Europe.

By 1945, the Bf 109 was the preferred mount of many of the Luftwaffe’s top aces, including the highest-scoring ace of all time—Erich Hartmann, with 352 victories. Repeatedly upgraded, the 109 was in continuous production throughout the war. Nearly 34,000 were completed, including license-built models in Spain and Czechoslovakia—more than any other fighter in history. Incredibly, the last operational mission for the Bf 109 was in 1967 in the same Spanish skies where it first saw combat in the 1930s.

The early variants of the 109, from the “V” prototypes through the Bf 109E or Emil, can be distinguished from the later marks by their square wingtips. The earlier variants also tended to be aerodynamically cleaner, as various bumps and bulges were added from the Gustav onward to accommodate the heavier weapons that they carried. Many builders prefer the battle-hardened Gustav, but I find the earlier variants sleeker and more appealing.

If the clean lines and historical significance of the Bf 109 aren’t enough of an attraction, there are also myriad paint schemes for consideration. These range from the aircraft of the Condor Legion in Spain, to those that battled over France and Britain, and to the aircraft stationed in North Africa. If front-line schemes don’t turn your crank, there were several colorful, polished, prewar racers that are bound to turn heads at the field.


The Plans

Several years ago, I designed a park flyer model of the early Bf 109 with a 30-inch wingspan. The design was in the Free Flight style—stick-and-tissue-type construction with lightweight electronics. To keep things simple and lightweight, this little Messerschmitt was a belly lander without any landing gear.

This 30-inch 109 flew so well that I scaled up the design to a 45-inch wingspan. The enlarged version retains the same structure, but with some upgrades. Because the heavier 45-inch model would be more prone to damage on a belly landing (that big chin scoop is dying to eat up some dirt), the wing was redesigned to include accommodations for servoless retracts.

The bigger plans are introduced here as a free download from Model Aviation’s website. Like the 30-inch Bf 109, the 45-inch version is available as a short kit with a plastic canopy and front cowl. The kit includes parts to build the larger chin scoop of the A through D models.

The 45-inch plans also include outlines for the chin and underwing scoops of the Emil, should the builder choose to model this variant. For builders who prefer to cut by hand, the parts’ outlines are included as a second sheet to the plans.

The construction of the 45-inch Bf 109 will be the subject of this three-part series. We’ll get through most of the framework in this article and move on to the internals in the next installment.


Construction

The design of this model and the techniques used to build it are very similar to the Miles M.20 that was covered in detail in last year’s “Construction Series.” This series will continue in the same fashion. I’ll spend more time on general balsa-building techniques than the traditional step-by-step build instruction format.

For techniques already discussed in detail, I’ll refer the reader to a “Construction Series” article when appropriate. These articles can be found on the Model Aviation website.


Tail Group

The tail of the Messerschmitt builds up exactly the same as the Miles M.20. The process begins by soaking 1/16 x 3/16 balsa strips in water overnight. After the balsa is flexible, the strips are stretched around a form to create the outlines of the tail parts.




Tail group outlines were created by laminating softened balsa strips around a foam-board form.


Complete the lamination by gluing three layers, one against the other. After the outlines have completely cured, they can be removed from the forms. Although they appear fragile, these laminations are strong and lightweight.

Assemble the tail parts from the kit over the plans and then fit the cured outlines into place. Cut strips of 3/32 balsa for the bracing that goes between the short kit parts and the laminated outlines.

The rudder and elevators are built-up from 3/16 balsa, while the fin and stabilizer are built from 1/8 balsa. Sheeting the thinner stock on the fin and stabilizer with 1/32 balsa will build these parts up to 3/16. The rudder and elevators will be left as open structures. This procedure does a good job of replicating the construction of the full-scale 109, which used fabric-covered control surfaces on an otherwise aluminum-sheeted structure.




Strip stock for bracing the framework was cut from the kit’s sheet wood with a balsa stripping tool.


For hinging models of this size, I’ve become a fan of Robart hinge points. One reason for this is that the hinge pivot point can be moved back into the leading edge of the control surface. This allows a builder to minimize the gap between the fixed and movable surfaces in the same way that is typically done on full-scale aircraft.




The offset hinge point and a little extra sheeting on the fin hide the rudder gap.




Now that the tail group is shaped and hinged, it can be set aside until it is time for covering.


These processes are explained in more detail at http://ModelAviation.com/m20tail.


Fuselage

The fuselage construction begins by building the left side over the plans. Get started by preassembling formers F6 through F8, and the two side keels K5 and K6 over the plans.

Now pin the vertical keel parts K1 through K4 to the plans. Join these parts together by gluing in the left half of each of the formers F2 through F9. Note that the top half of F3 is tilted backward. This will make it easier to remove the battery hatch later.




There are a few parts that need preassembly before the real fuselage construction can begin.


Tie all of the formers together with the preassembled side keel K5/6. Now install the wing saddle. Dampen the outer side of the saddle with a little water and it will begin to curl. Glue it to formers F3, F4, and F6. Add a few stringers to stiffen the fuselage assembly and then let it cure completely before removing it from the board.




Now that the keels, formers, and saddle are in place, it’s time to add a few stringers.


The right side of the fuselage is built free of the building board. Begin by gluing the battery tray, wing pin plate (WP), and wing bolt pad (WB) to the left side assembly. Now glue the right half of each former to its left-side counterpart. Small spring clamps are handy for pinching the former halves together so that they are parallel to one another.

Add the side keel K5/6, the wing saddle, and a couple of stringers. Now it’s time to move on to the battery hatch.




Clamps hold the right side formers parallel to the left halves.


Battery Hatch

Construction to this point has been simple. Building a removable battery hatch isn’t any more difficult, but it is important enough to deserve a section of its own. The following process applies to access hatches in many different models.

The parting line for the hatch is formed between doubled formers at each end of the hatch, and a pair of horizontal rails. The order in which the hatch parts are assembled is important. If the rails that form the lower parting face of the hatch are installed first, it will be almost impossible to get the hatch formers into their notches.

Glue the three hatch formers into their notches in the upper keel. Be careful not to glue the front and back hatch formers to their adjacent fuselage formers. Inserting pins between these parts as shown will prevent the formers from sticking and maintain an even parting line.




The rails that frame the edges of the hatch go in after the formers. Slide the bottoms in first, and then the top.




Hatch formers are glued only to the upper keel. Pins maintain a gap between the hatch and the fuselage formers.


Now the hatch rails can go in. Slide the lower rails into place first and glue them to the notches in the fuselage formers. Now fit the upper rails, but glue them only to the hatch formers. Use a few pins in the former parting lines to create an even gap, and to keep the corners of the hatch from sticking to the fuselage opening. If done in this order, this should be a hassle-free operation. Strengthen the hatch by adding a fillet of glue to the corners of the hatch rails and formers.

Now the time has come to get to stringing! Remove the pins between the hatch formers and add the stringers, working from side to side. Keep a close eye out for warps as you go. Installing the stringers and using balsa infill to strengthen key areas are covered in depth in the “Construction Series” fuselage article (http://ModelAviation.com/m20fuselage).

After all of the stringers are in place, sand the entire fuselage. Most of the stringers can stand slightly higher than their formers. This helps to minimize wrinkles later when the covering is pushed up by the formers. The stringers at the ends of the hatch must be sanded flush with the formers. If not, wrinkles will form when the covering is stretched at each of the high spots.

Now it’s time to cut the hatch free. By now, the completed and sanded fuselage should be a thing of beauty. Many builders are intimidated to take a knife or saw to their handiwork, but it must be done.

Carefully cut the upper keel and each stringer between the doubled formers at the front and back of the hatch. Take your time and be careful to cut only the stringers and not into the formers. If care was taken with the glue, the hatch should pop free without much trouble. If not, carefully cut through any excess glue and pry gently with a wide blade until the hatch can be removed.




Free the hatch by cutting between the doubled formers with a sharp blade or razor saw.


A combination of a pin in the front and magnets in the back is a nice way to hold the hatch in place. The pin will keep the front from lifting in flight while two pairs of rare-earth magnets, available from K&J Magnetics, allow the hatch to be snapped on and off. The pin can be a bit of wire or dowel. Strong, but tiny, rare-earth magnets are available in many shapes and sizes at your hobby shop or online. Two pairs of 1/16 x 1/8-inch diameter magnets were used on the Bf 109 prototype.

With the hatch framework in place, drill a hole through the plywood front former and into the front of the hatch for the pin. Now drill holes through the hatch and fuselage rails for the magnets. Drilling guide holes in the rails before the stringers go in makes it easier to align the magnet holes later.

Use your choice of glue to hold the pin into place in the front of the hatch. I use epoxy on the magnets. A neat trick for this is to put a small piece of waxed paper between each pair of magnets. Coat the holes in the rails with epoxy. Now drop the magnets into place in the lower rails.




The front pin is in place and the rear magnets are ready for epoxy.


The waxed paper will keep the magnets from falling through and prevent the rails from sticking to one another. This method will also ensure that the polarity of the magnets is correct. Getting that backward is not cause for celebration.

Carefully fit the hatch into position. The upper magnets should slip into their holes in the hatch rails. Clamp the hatch into position and brush a little epoxy over the exposed faces of the magnets and the surrounding areas in the rails. After the epoxy is cured, the hatch should easily pop on and off.




Here’s the fuselage with all of the stringers in place and the tail loosely fitted. Next on the punch list are wings and retracts.


In Closing

It’s been great to hear from builders who downloaded the free Miles M.20 plans last year. So far, the only complaint has been from a few builders who found that the short kit parts didn’t quite fit the plans because they had printed them at the wrong scale.

If you decide to download and print either of these plans, please make sure to print at 100% scale. You can double-check the scaling of the print by measuring the 4-inch rulers in the lower left corner of the plans.

See you next month when we frame up the Bf 109’s wing and install the retracts.

—Paul Kohlmann
ptkohlmann@aol.com


Sources

RetroRC (45-inch Bf-109 short kit)
(248) 212-9666
www.retrorc.us.com

Manzano Laser Works (30-inch Bf-109 short kit)
(505) 250-1540
www.manzanolaser.com

Robart Manufacturing, Inc.
(630) 584-7616
www.robart.com

K&J Magnetics, Inc.
(8880 746-7556
www.kjmagnetics.com


Previous installments (Building the Miles M.20)



Installment #1
(Toolbox basics)


Installment #5
(Building the tail group)


Installment #9
Casting detail parts


Installment #2
(Balsa builders' parlance


Installment #6
(Building the fuselage)


Installment #10
(Waterslide decals)


Installment #3
Reading plans


Installment #7
Building the wing


Installment #11
(Wrapping it up)


Installment #4
Workflow planning


Installment #8
Polyspan and paint


Download all installments
(.zip format - 46MB)





Profile B-29 and X-1

$
0
0


Written by Dick Sarpolus
Relive the race to break the sound barrier
Construction article with free plans
Photos by the author except as noted
As seen in the October 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.




Download free plans!

B-29 plans
Click here for full plans 52.53" x 33.31"
Click here for tiled plans 8.5" x 11"



X-1 plans
Click here for full plans 28.15" x 17.14"
Click here for tiled plans 8.5" x 11"



Construction article

During World War II, our B-17s and B-24s were responsible for heavy bombing in Europe. When the B-29s came along late in the war, they did the heavy bombing in the Pacific. The B-29 bomber served again during the Korean conflict.

At that time, there was a demand for airplanes to fly faster, and Bell Aircraft built the X-1 as a supersonic research aircraft. A B-29 carried the X-1 up to altitude and dropped/launched it. Its pilot would then start the rocket motor and set about breaking the sound barrier. In 1947, Chuck Yeager piloted the X-1 and became the first person to fly faster than sound. Supersonic flight had arrived.

Most people know that aviation history, and many RC modelers are aware of the large B-29 model that Mac Hodges, from Georgia, flew for many years. He flew his B-29, including dropping a rocket-powered X-1, at RC aircraft gatherings, including Joe Nall Week and Warbirds Over Delaware.

Aeromodeling magazines have documented Mac’s exploits with the large model, and many videos of his exciting demonstrations have circulated. His last B-29 spanned 20 feet, weighed nearly 100 pounds, was powered by four 80cc gasoline engines, and was fully aerobatic.

The airplane had retracts and a smoke system, and in addition to carrying aloft and launching the rocket-powered X-1, it could drop parachutists. This airplane flew with seven receivers, 20 servos, and 16 batteries. Now that is some RC model airplane!

As I’ve gotten older, my airplane projects have become smaller and lighter. I enjoy building and flying compact, electric-powered foamie warbirds—no more large gas-powered airplanes for me.

Thinking about a new design effort, I knew I could do a four-engine bomber, and to make it more interesting, so why not try a B-29/X-1 project such as Mac’s, in a smaller, less-impressive size?

I’ve had a lot of fun with profile electric warbirds, all built around a “standard” hot-wire-cut foam wing core I’ve used for dozens of fun-fly airplanes. The wing core has a fairly thick, full, symmetrical airfoil, a slightly tapered planform, and a 48-inch wingspan. I cut down foam core to suit whatever design I’m working on at the time.

I laid out a profile B-29 with a 48-inch wingspan, 40-inch length, and roughly 400 square inches of wing area. I planned to use four motors with approximately 120 watts each, for plenty of power.

I also laid out a 21-inch wingspan sheet-foam Bell X-1 airplane that I’d carry up to altitude with the B-29, release it, and another pilot would fly it back to the ground as a glider. If I could figure out a way to power the X-1 with a small rocket motor, it would be even better.

The project turned out fine. With four powerplants, the B-29 is slightly heavy, but it flies well and is quite aerobatic—rolls, loops, and inverted passes are no problem. It is fun to take that X-1 aloft, drop it, and have it glide down to the ground.




The rocket-powered X-1 (L) and the profile glider X-1 are both made of sheet foam. The rocket-powered version has a fatter fuselage, and the wing and fuselage are reinforced with carbon-fiber rods.


With the aileron and elevator control, its pilot said the X-1 was easy to control in the glide down to the ground. Unfortunately, it didn’t glide so well—but hey, it was easy to fly. My friend, Rich Border, built an X-1 from balsa and plywood, and powered it with a small rocket motor, which had an ignitor circuit on the airplane. The plan was to take the X-1 up with the B-29, drop it, and its pilot would ignite the rocket motor and climb the X-1 under rocket power, before a long glide down.

On the B-29’s first try with the rocket-powered X-1, when the X-1 was dropped, the rocket motor didn’t ignite and the X-1 was lost somewhere in the high grass and tough shrubbery surrounding our field, so no more rocket-powered X-1 flying for a while.

Then Matt Hamilton made a foam X-1 with carbon-fiber rod reinforcements. It was quite lightweight, even with the receiver, servos, batteries, ignition circuit, and rocket motor. We performed three test drops of the new X-1 so Matt could trim it out, adjust the throws, etc. He tried the ignition circuit on the ground, and the rocket motor happily came to life.

The first full test drop worked great. The X-1 was stable, the rocket fired, and the airplane flew rapidly straight ahead with an easily visible smoke trail. We have since made a half dozen successful drops. The rocket motor ignited on demand each time, and the X-1 was easily controllable. Those smoke trails were great to see! The burn time of the motors was one second. Now under consideration is a more powerful rocket motor with a longer burn time.




The B-29 has just released the X-1. It’s fun to recreate the flight of the X-1 to break the sound barrier, with Chuck Yeager at the controls.


We had one near disaster. After the drop, the X-1 became tangled in the B-29’s tail surfaces, and the airplanes went into a spiral dive. I cut the power on the B-29 and the aircraft separated. Both were easily controlled, and no damage was done.

The B-29 flies well, so consider this four-engine project. You don’t have to carry along an X-1 to launch; you could have your B-29 launch your own Little Boy and/or Fat Man replicas.

The B-29’s thick, airfoiled wing works well and certainly helps with the weight. The sheet-foam portions of the airframe are strengthened with thin plywood doublers and wood stringers, making the model rugged enough for active, practical flying. Things will likely break in rough landings, but this material is easily repaired with 5-minute epoxy.

Any commercially available 5mm or 1/4-inch foam is suitable for the airframe parts, even low-cost house insulation foam. For the hot-wire-cut foam wing panels, if you don’t have access to a cutter, The Core House in Pennsylvania has a computer-driven cutting setup that does a good job. The company sells a box of cores at a good price.

I set the cores up for a 24-inch length and you trim them for the proper planform, tip shape, etc. I’ve made approximately two dozen profile warbirds, all using the same basic wing panels.

I cut the sheet foam parts out with a metal straightedge and a sharp, scalpel-type modeling knife. The 1/32-inch plywood doublers on the fuselage and the hardwood stiffener down the middle of the fuselage add the strength for the profile to work. Plywood doublers are also used on both sides of the sheet-foam engine nacelles, and 1/8-inch plywood firewalls/motor mounts are epoxied onto the nacelles with plywood gussets.

There are more parts to cut out for this four-engine project, but it is easy. I’m usually in a hurry and I often build with 5-minute epoxy. The type of sheet foam with thin plastic on both sides needs holes punched in it where the epoxy will go.




All of the parts are laid out for the B-29. The profile fuselage pieces, nacelles, tail surface parts, and ailerons are cut from 1/4-inch or 5mm sheet foam. The wing panels are hot-wire-cut foam, and are commercially available at low cost.


Cut slots into the wing cores for the strong, 1/8-inch plywood wing joiner. The wing spars are made from 1/8 x 3/8-inch basswood purchased at an arts and crafts store. They are epoxied into the foam cores. The two wing panels butt up against the fuselage sides. The joiner goes through a slot in the fuselage and into the wing cores between the upper and lower spars.

Done this way, there is not a large hole cut through the fuselage for the wing section. Slots are cut into the wing’s leading edges (LEs) and back to the spar locations for the four engine nacelles.

The wingtips are sanded to a rounded shape and vinyl spackling putty is used to fill in the gouges and rough spots in the foam, which doesn’t sand well.

The foam wing panels don’t have to be covered for strength, but iron-on plastic covering keeps them clean and smooth, and makes it easy to achieve a good-looking paint job. I like SLC Covering sold by The Core House.

Hinging the control surfaces is done with 2-inch plastic packaging tape on both sides of all of the surfaces, as is customary on foamies. The LEs of the ailerons, elevator, and rudder are sanded at an angle, and the tape is first applied to the upper surfaces. Then, with the control surfaces folded upward, the tape is applied to the bottom, pushed into the hinge cap, and sealed to both edges. This allows free movement and provides a strong, completely sealed hinge gap.




The completed airframes fully assembled before paint and equipment installation.


The servos are mounted by cutting holes into the foam for a push fit, and securing them in place with dabs from a hot-glue gun. You can also epoxy plywood mounting pads to the foam and mount the servos with small screws. Slots are cut into the control surfaces and the plywood control horns are epoxied in place.

I used .047 music wire pushrods with a Z-bend on one end and a Du-Bro Mini-EZ link on the other end. Several plywood standoff supports for the pushrod along its length keep it from flexing.

Four brushless outrunner motors, capable of approximately 120 watts or so, are used. I like the BP Hobbies Cheetah A2208-14 motors with three-blade 7 x 4 propellers (I couldn’t find any four-blade propellers). You will need an ESC for each motor, rated at roughly 20 amps. I made up Y harnesses to couple the four ESC control leads together to plug into the receiver, and a heavy Y harness to couple the four ESC power leads together to plug into the three-cell 2,200 mAh LiPo battery pack.

The ESCs, receiver, and battery pack are mounted to the wing surface and fuselage with hook-and-loop tape. I cut slots through the fuselage above and below the battery pack for a hook-and-loop strap to hold it in place. The four ESCs and all of the wiring on the bottom surface of the wing make a mess, and you’ll need to put some holes through the engine nacelles and the fuselage for the wiring to connect.

I suppose you could bury much of the wiring in the wing foam core, but that seemed like too much trouble. With the wiring below the wing, the top of the airplane looks good and when it’s flying, you don’t see that mess of wiring. It doesn’t seem to bother the airplane’s flying ability, so I can ignore it. Hey, this is “fun-scale” stuff. Put on some scale detailing and have fun!

Four small servos and a small Y harness for the two aileron servos are needed.

I paint my foamie warbirds with water-based acrylic craft paint, available in most arts and crafts stores. It is inexpensive and comes in many colors. I couldn’t find any silver/aluminum metallic paint that I liked, so I painted the B-29 light gray. An inexpensive airbrush or small spray gun works fine. It’s easy to thin the paint with water.

I use a 1-inch wide foam brush to apply the paint by hand. It works fine, provides a decent finish with not too much work, and cleans up easily. A black Sharpie marker pen works well for drawing the panel lines and other scale details that add so much to the overall scale military appearance.




The author paints his foamie warbirds with low-cost, water-based acrylic craft paint, available in the arts and crafts stores in many colors. A black Sharpie marker was used for the panel lines.


Military insignia is available through hobby outlets, but I’ve had plenty of insignia copied at local digital copy shops, enlarged or reduced, and printed onto peel-and-stick paper. The copier ink isn’t waterproof, so I spray the insignia with flat, clear polyurethane before sticking them onto the airframe.

If you don’t want to stop with the B-29, but want to build the X-1 for even more fun, it’s easy to make it from the same sheet foam with some thin plywood and wood stiffeners. Only aileron and elevator control is needed to fly it back to the ground after it’s launched from the B-29.




The X-1 is simply a small, sheet-foam glider with aileron and elevator control and doesn’t require many parts.



The X-1 fits well under the B-29 and is ready to be carried aloft and released.


To carry and launch the X-1, I made up a plywood-and-balsa wooden carrier with a slot in it for the X-1 fuselage. It bolts onto the side of the B-29’s fuselage below the wing. A small servo moves a wire pin in and out through the carrier and the X-1 fuselage to retain and then drop it.




The release mechanism on the bottom of the B-29 retains the X-1 until it is released by the pilot.


You can add rocket power to your X-1, or another suggestion that might work out well would be to use a small, high-speed brushless motor in the rear fuselage of the X-1 with a small pusher propeller.

The easiest way for me to launch the B-29 is with an underhand, swinging-arm launch (I can’t do overhand javelin-throw launches anymore). This bomber has plenty of power to climb up and out of a hand launch. Because of its weight, when landing it’s best to carry a good bit of power down to the ground, cutting power just before a smooth touchdown.

This is not a 20-foot wingspan, 100-pound gas burning, noisy B-29. It’s small, lightweight enough, quiet, neat and clean, and can be flown nearly anywhere for plenty of fun. This B-29 looks good making a low-level inverted pass, a spin, and other good moves.

Hey this stuff is fun!

—Dick Sarpolus
rsarpolus2@comcast.net


Sources:

The Core House
(717) 566-3810
http://home.earthlink.net/~philcartier/webcat/catalog.html

Du-Bro
(800) 848-9411
www.dubro.com

Spektrum
(800) 338-4639
www.spektrumrc.com

BP Hobbies
support@bphobbies.com
www.bphobbies.com




Prair-E-Duster Biplane

$
0
0


Written by Larry Kruse
Build a FF-inspired foam electric model
Construction article
Photos by the author
As seen in the October 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.




Download free plans!

Click here for full plans 27.13" x 19.65"
Click here for tiled plans 8.5" x 11"



Specifications

Skill level: Beginner to intermediate
Construction: 2mm Depron foam
Wingspan: 16.75 inches
Length: 14 inches
Weight: 34 grams without battery
Needed to complete: Flyzone “brick,” motor, gearbox, propeller, and battery


Construction article

This design originated more than 30 years ago with a little sheet-balsa CO2-powered Free Flight (FF) biplane called the Prairie Duster that was published as a construction article in the May 1984 issue of Flying Models.

The impetus for that little airplane was a small park directly across the street from my home. I wanted something that could be tossed into the air when the wind was sufficiently calm, and would provide the satisfying sight of two wings circling overhead.

Throughout several years, the little airplane provided many hours of pleasure. Flights typically consisted of shallow climbing circles to roughly 75 feet, followed by a slow descent to a wheel landing when the propeller made its last few rotations as the CO2 ran out.

Today’s wonderfully adaptable micro RC systems, LiPo batteries, and Depron foam all came together to suggest that it might be time to resurrect the little biplane as an RC sport flier for indoor flying or a calm morning or evening outdoors.

To provide continuity and bridge three decades, while recognizing today’s technology, the airplane was rechristened the Prair-E Duster in deference to its power source. It has proven to be as satisfying as the original—and you don’t have to walk after it when it lands!


General Construction Notes

The Prair-E Duster is constructed primarily from 2mm Depron foam. A single 15 x 39 sheet from RC Foam will yield parts for two airplanes. Controls and power are provided by a Flyzone brick, motor, gearbox, propeller, and a 140 mAh battery. Other control and power options would work, but you will need more power than salvaged Ember, Vapor, or similar motor and gearbox combinations will provide.

Other materials include a piece of .030-diameter music wire for the landing gear, a 10-inch length of .030 carbon-fiber rod for the two wing strut stiffeners, and a scrap of 16-inch medium balsa for the laminated landing gear mount.
Du-Bro micro control horns were used on both the rudder and elevator. Pushrod wires were formed from .025-diameter music wire. One-inch lightweight plastic wheels were salvaged from another project and painted with flat black enamel. They were held in place with the time-honored FF technique of Duco cement on the ends of the axles.

Most of the airplane was constructed with Bob Smith Industries Super Gold foam-safe CA glue. I used a hot glue gun to mount the Flyzone brick, motor, and gearbox.

I prepare for a project by cutting out all of the pieces before actual construction begins. I am able to move smoothly from one part of the model to another without having to stop and cut out a few more parts. In this case, I recommend copying the plans and then gluing the copy to lightweight poster board. Each piece can be cut out to make a template for tracing onto the Depron sheet. A sharp, soft lead pencil will work better for tracing than a pen. A pen leaves residue that can be hard to remove.

The 2mm Depron requires a word or two to ensure satisfactory results. It has a grain to it and two distinct sides that need to be recognized, particularly when bending or molding it to curved surfaces such as the top decking. The grain will usually run lengthwise on a stock rectangular sheet.

There will be one shiny side and a side that is duller in appearance. The shiny side will need to be placed on the bottom in any bending or molding efforts. Experimenting with scraps will serve you well. The objective is to come up with a curved top surface essentially free of creases. Keith Sparks wrote an excellent foam primer in the October 2015 issue of Model Aviation titled “Building With Foam.” It will serve you well in developing techniques to work with the material.

Several pieces of the Prair-E Duster, including the first five formers and the cabane pylon, require lamination. The easiest method for cutting out the laminated parts is to glue slightly oversize blanks for each part, trace the pieces onto the foam, and then cut through both thicknesses using a sharp hobby knife or scalpel. A disposable scalpel with a #11 blade has become my standard cutting tool.




Basic fuselage components are ready for assembly. The front five formers, including the motor mount, are laminations of 2mm Depron joined by foam-safe CA glue. Formers F-6 through F-8 are not laminated.


Wing Assembly

The top and bottom wings can each be cut out as one blank and then separated at the centerline. Make sure the Depron grain direction runs spanwise. To get the required undercamber, select approximately a 3/4- to 1-inch diameter mandrel as a cambering tool. I used a 3/4-inch diameter aluminum wing joiner tube for this project.

Place the shiny side of each wing blank facing down and roll the foam blank back and forth over the mandrel using the palms and flat of your hands. Be sure and remove all of your rings from your fingers before you begin, to avoid denting the material on the top side!

After the camber appears acceptable, glue one wing rib to the center joint of each panel. To get the correct dihedral for each panel, position the center of each wing panel at the edge of your workbench, prop up the wingtip 1 inch, and sand the center rib as you would a Hand-Launch Glider wing blank.

Go at it gently because you’re only working with a 2mm thickness. When angles have been sanded in each of the four panels, glue them together, maintaining the 1-inch-per-panel dihedral by blocking up the wingtips.

When the panels cure, glue the 1/8-inch doubler to each of the leading edges (LEs), then glue the outboard camber ribs to all four panels. At this point, you can cut slots in the bottom wing to accept the carbon-fiber rod reinforced struts. Note that only the bottom wings require the slots and that they are cut to the inboard side of the ribs. Rounding and tapering the wing’s LE and slightly rounding all of the other edges will let you lay the wings aside until the fuselage is framed up.




After the wings are joined at the center, the LE doubler strips are added. Note the small black dots (circled in the photo) on both wings that mark the placement of the camber ribs.


Fuselage Assembly

As noted, the first five formers, including the motor mount, require lamination. After they’ve been cut out, it’s worthwhile to stack formers F-2 through F-4 together and dress them down by carefully sanding them to exactly the same width. Being a uniform width will help ensure that the fuselage stays straight as it is formed up. Lightly mark the inside of both fuselage sides to show where the formers go.

Draw a straight reference line on your building board and assemble the fuselage over it, constantly checking to make sure it isn’t developing a bow when viewed from the top. For those used to working with balsa and pinning it in place to keep it straight, you’re about to embark upon a new learning curve.

Small scrap balsa blocks pinned down against the fuselage sides will help keep them straight. Work slowly as you install formers F-2 through F-4 and glue them to both of the fuselage sides, holding them in place and checking their respective alignments as they cure.

After formers F-2 through F-8 are in place, the laminated mounting rails for the Flyzone brick can be installed. The receiver unit is glued in place with hot glue at its four corners, using the tabs that stick out.

I found that I did a neater job by setting my glue gun to its “hot” position, squeezing out a small puddle of glue, then using a toothpick to put the glue in place over the tabs and let it set up. Sticking the glue gun nozzle into the fuselage cavity was entirely too messy and nearly impossible to control.

Likewise, hot glue is the medium to use for mounting the motor into the motor mount. Because of the motor and gearbox profile, I was able to cut and file a hole in the motor mount to accommodate the unit, and then cut anchoring slots into the mount to accept the flanges on the side of the gearbox.

After the motor unit is seated to your satisfaction in the motor mount, remove it and glue the motor mount into position, drawing the fuselage sides together squarely during the process to eliminate any bowing of the front. After it cures, reinsert the motor into its cavity, making sure there is clearance between the propeller and the front of the nose.

Now it should be angled 5° down and 3° to the right of the centerline. Using the hot glue and a toothpick, glue it in place and hold it until the hot glue sets up. You can finish the nose area by adding the nose doublers and an additional bead of CA on the backside of the motor mount.

Laminate the 1/16-inch scrap balsa landing gear sandwich and glue it in place as shown on the plans. Now is the time to form and add the Z-bend pushrods for the elevator and the rudder, connecting them to the servos in the Flyzone control unit.




The scrap balsa landing gear sandwich is installed at an angle with the top of it butting against F-3. Be sure that no glue runs down onto the receiver circuit board during the installation process.


Note that they cross within the fuselage. You will need to fire up your radio to find out which servo controls what. Keep the ends of the pushrods generously long and unformed at this point. The required Z-bends at the aft end will be formed as the stabilizer and rudder are installed. Test-fit the laminated cabane pylon to make sure it is seated in F-3 and F-4 and the top of it is at 0° relative to the model’s centerline.

With the bottom of the fuselage remaining open, it’s time to put the curved top decking in place. Following the guidelines for the grain of the foam outlined in the construction notes, create two curved blanks for the front and rear of the fuselage by wrapping them around the mandrel previously used for the wing camber, and taping them in place using blue painter’s tape. I kept the foam blanks taped around the mandrel overnight to let them set.

After removing them from the mandrel, cut one straight side on each blank and begin the process of cutting and fitting the decking a little at a time before gluing. Taping the straight side of either the front or rear decking to the top edge of the fuselage will allow it to bend over the formers.

Trim a little at a time until you have a straight seam on both sides. A narrow bead of CA glue on one side will allow you to attach the other side and hold it in place as it is glued. Gluing the decking to the formers can be done from inside the fuselage and doesn’t require much adhesive. Be sure to keep the adhesive out of the radio unit and the motor!

The slot for the cabane pylon can now be carefully cut in the front deck sheeting using a straightedge to keep the slot in a friction fit. After you are satisfied with the fit, you can glue the pylon in place. A thin bead of glue applied to the pylon/decking joint on the top side will ensure a neat installation. The joint at F-3 and F-4 should be glued from the inside.


Tail Surfaces

Both the rudder and the stabilizer can be cut out as single units. The stabilizer requires an elevator joiner. In this case, a round toothpick cut to length serves well. Glue the toothpick joiner into its slot, and after it is dry, carefully cut the elevator free. Sand the rear of the stabilizer to a chisel-shaped 45° angle so that the unit can be hinged on the top side with no joint showing. I found 1/2-inch Blenderm tape to be perfect for the job.

The rudder is treated in the same way. Separate it from the fin with a 45° flex angle sanded into the joint line and reattach both pieces with Blenderm tape.




The wing and tail group are cut out of 2mm Depron. Preparing all parts before beginning construction makes the building process more efficient and lets things move along smoothly.


Final Assembly

Test-fit and glue the bottom wing to the fuselage and tack-glue the top wing to the cabane pylon. Check everything to make sure it is straight from the front and from the top view. If it is to your satisfaction, finish gluing the top wing rib/pylon joint and add the pylon doublers to each side.

The reinforced struts can be fitted into position with the carbon-fiber rods to the inside. The struts are overly long on purpose and will need to be trimmed at the bottom when the assembly is complete. Check the strut angle and the wing alignment before gluing them into position. After they are dry, cut the remaining rib blanks to fit as caps on the inside of the camber ribs, butted up against the struts on the front and back.




The wing struts slip into a slot in the bottom wing with the .030 carbon-fiber rod stiffeners to the inside of the wing. They are not glued in place until both wings are installed.


If you haven’t done so, bend an adjustment kink into the elevator and the rudder pushrods aft of where they exit the fuselage. Neutralize the servos to make sure you will have equal movement in all directions, and then put a Z-bend in both pushrods precisely parallel to the end of the fuselage. You will need a horizontal Z-bend for the stabilizer horn and a vertical bend for the rudder horn. Clip off any excess and make sure the control horns can be threaded onto the Z-bends.




Both pushrods require an adjustment kink, as shown here, to fine-tune the elevator and rudder to make sure they are neutral and have equal movement in both directions.


Test-fit the stabilizer and lightly sand either side of the mounting slot to make sure the stabilizer is square with the wings when viewed from the front and the rear. If it is, glue it in place and then glue the control horn with the pushrod attached in position.

Do the same with the rudder and then check to see that both the elevator and rudder are neutral when the radio is switched on. Make any required adjustments using the adjustment kinks of the respective pushrods.

If everything looks good, you can close up the bottom of the fuselage with 2mm sheeting. Note that the sheeting between the motor mount and former F-2 is a laminate, with one piece fitting inside the opening and the other on the outside. That was done because over time, the need to mount and remount the battery on its hook-and-loop strip creates stress on that area.

The last pieces to be added in the construction process are the tapered headrest, the tapered fill pieces between the fin and the fuselage, and the tail skid. All are laminations of two pieces of scrap foam sanded to shape. Depron sheet is amenable to sanding, so if there are rough spots, joints that are not quite right, or other anomalies that could be helped with some judicious sanding, now would be the time to do it.




The cockpit area shows the sheet fill on the fuselage sides sanded to arrive at a rounded cockpit entry, and the laminated headrest sanded to a taper and mounted on the turtledeck sheeting.


This model’s trim scheme was done with MonoKote trim sheet and lettering from Callie Graphics. The Prair-E Duster offers limitless possibilities as an all-white canvas for decorating.


Flight Notes

Shifting the battery on the hook-and-loop strip on the bottom of the fuselage should balance the model on the center of gravity noted on the plans. If you need to add some weight to get it to balance, use a small piece of modeling clay.

For hand launches, apply approximately half power and launch the airplane level with a reasonable forward motion. It will fly straight ahead and give you time to find the sticks to put it under your control. My first flight required only a click of down-elevator and two clicks of left rudder.

Rise-off-ground takeoffs--either outdoors or indoors--required only an incremental increase of power to get it smoothly off the surface and into a comfortable flight mode. The model, principally because of its FF heritage and light wing loading (34 grams without the battery), is a stable platform.




Because of its FF heritage and light wing loading (34 grams without the battery), the Prair-E Duster is a stable platform.


Landings are fun by simply reducing the throttle and flaring the airplane out approximately 6 inches above the landing surface. The large wheels and forward placement of the landing gear make it resistant to tipping over.

The model is intended for indoor and outdoor flight in permissible conditions, and has met that goal well. Just as the original sheet balsa Prairie Duster FF model had hundreds of satisfactory flights, I hope this updated version provides the same sense of satisfaction for you--all without requiring a single jaunt to retrieve it!

—Larry Kruse
aircats@att.net


Sources:

Flyzone
(800) 637-7660
www.flyzoneplanes.com

RC Foam
www.rcfoam.com

Du-Bro
(800) 848-9411
www.dubro.com

Bob Smith Industries
(805) 466-1717
www.bsi-inc.com

Callie Graphics
info@callie-graphics.com
www.callie-graphics.com

AMA Plans Service
(800) 435-9262
www.modelaircraft.org/plans.aspx




Retro RC The Saucerus RC

$
0
0


Written by Joe Hass
A CL-inspired flying saucer
Product review
Photos by the author
Read the full product review in the October issue of
Model Aviation.


Specifications:

Model type: Laser-cut kit
Skill level: Intermediate
Wingspan: 19 inches
Wing area: 283 square inches
Length: 21 inches
Weight: 17 ounces
Construction: Balsa and light plywood
Street price: $89.98


Test-model details:

Motor used: Turnigy 2822/14 1,450 Kv brushless electric outrunner
Speed controller: Turnigy 20-amp
Servos: Three Hitec HS-55
Battery: Glacier three-cell 800 mAh LiPo
Propeller: APC 7 x 4
Radio system: Tactic TA624 receiver; Tactic transmitter
Ready-to-fly weight: 17 ounces
Flight duration: 5 to 10 minutes


Pluses:

• Interlocking laser-cut parts make building easy.
• Unusual configuration.
• Incredibly strong.
• Can be hand launched similar to a Frisbee.


Minus:

• Requires significant nose weight.


Bonus video:



Product review

Retro RC has an enviable history of reincarnating vintage designs into practical, enjoyable, easily built aircraft. The company has done it again with The Saucerus RC. The original design dates back to a 1953 George Harris Control Line (CL) model called the Sassy Saucer. Modern laser cutting and a great updated design make this an easy project.

This review is slightly unusual in that it is based on a production prototype kit. I didn’t have formal instructions. I did have plans, some build pictures, and most importantly, access to designer Mark Freeland, who lives nearby.

Start by reviewing the parts layout on the laser-cut wood and the plans. I found it helpful to either leave the pieces until they are needed or mark them for later identification. A couple of things can be done early and allowed to dry. The lower cowl is formed by wetting the piece and wrapping it around something that has roughly a 1-inch diameter. Form the pieces while keeping in mind the built-in right thrust.

The wheels are built up on a drill bit. I prefer to use a slower-drying adhesive to make sure that every surface is wetted. Avoid getting adhesive on the outer surface of the balsa disk because it will be difficult to sand to shape.

After the wheel assembly is thoroughly dry, simply chuck the drill bit into your drill or drill press and sand a smooth contour to the balsa disk. I used 220-grit sandpaper to avoid removing too much material.




Nine pieces of plywood and balsa form the wheels. Use a drill as a guide to hold everything in alignment. The drill then becomes the spindle to shape the balsa end caps.


Assembly

The saucer is composed of interlocking ribs running front to back and spars running left to right. Follow the plans and begin interlocking the ribs and spars. The ESC tray interlocks between two ribs and two spars on the right side.

Don’t glue anything yet. Pay special attention to the orientation of each piece of the outer ring. You should have five separate sections. H1 and H8 stay separate, H2 and H3 are glued together, H4 and H5 are glued together, and H6 and H7 are glued together. These subassemblies slide into the perimeter slots in the ribs and spars. The sub ribs associated with the elevons should be installed when you are sliding in the outer ring pieces.

The most important part of the process is properly aligning all of these pieces. Prop up the outer ring. I used some scrap strip balsa that was cut to 1-inch lengths. Whatever you have handy will work, but support the entire perimeter and add weights to hold everything in place.

Now sight down each rib and spar to make sure they are perfectly straight. Using a straightedge is preferred, especially on S5 and S6 because they serve as the hinge line for the elevons.

Sand, trim, and adjust to make sure everything is perfectly straight. Use the control horns to adjust the spacing of the EVR sub ribs and to create a slot for the elevons. Use the vertical fin F3 to confirm that CR1 and CR2 are truly vertical and spaced correctly.

All of this alignment will pay off later, so take your time. There are laser-cut slots for the CA hinges on the elevons. I positioned the CA hinges in the slots (without gluing them) to maintain alignment. You can also use a #11 X-Acto blade to hold them.

When you are satisfied that everything is straight and vertical, begin at the center with a few drops of thin CA glue at each joint. Work your way around the airframe, rechecking alignment as you go. Add S5a and S6a to the top and bottom.

Add the precut sheeting WS8 for the fin area. After seeing some of the prototype aircraft, I decided to add sheeting between EVR and CR2 to create more contact area for the covering. You can also add additional ribs.

The motor mount, landing gear mount, battery box, and receiver mount are lightweight plywood assemblies. Pay special attention to the left and right markings on each piece. I decided to not laminate the landing gear in place to make covering easier. This assembly slides between R4 and R5.

The leading edge (LE) sheeting is precut and assembled before attaching it to the wing. Carefully check the fit. Because of the complex curve, I found that it was helpful to wet the outer surface with ammonia to help bend the sheeting.

Start at the center section and work outward, gluing only a small section at a time. You will have to trim each rib for the best fit. Work slowly. I used thin CA glue to attach the sheeting.


Servo, Receiver Hatch, and Fin

The servo tray is designed for Hitec HS-55 servos. Unlike everything else in the kit, there is no laser-cut interlocking location for the servo tray. This is deliberate to take into account a variety of servos.

There is also no hard point for the servo splines to pass through the covering. This is also by design. Position the servo tray with the servo splines slightly above the expected location of the covering. I’ll have more specifics about handling this when we detail the covering.

The receiver hatch is composed of seven balsa pieces, plus the magnet. The matching hatch support is installed on top of the floor in the receiver bay. The receiver can be suspended with rubber bands, on a scrap balsa floor, or allowed to float in the opening as I did with it.

The lower fin is assembled with a balsa core, plywood stiffeners, and plywood doublers for the plywood tail wheel location. An eyelet is used for the wheel axle.

The canopy is made up of multiple balsa pieces that are sanded to shape. Make sure the plywood floor and magnets are correctly oriented to take into account the built-in right thrust and magnet polarity.

Next, finely sand everything before separating the elevons from the wing. A razor blade or #11 blade works best. After the elevons are separated, carefully sand in the bevel in the LE of each elevon. Be careful at the pointed end because it will sand quickly.

You should now have a group of completed assemblies. I painted the wheels and the canopy. A few coats of primer and some sanding will make them ready for your finish colors.




The canopy is made from multiple pieces of laser-cut balsa and sanded to shape. Attach the balsa to the plywood floor before sanding.




This shows the completed assemblies before covering. The wheels have been primed.


Servos and Covering

Let’s get back to the servos and covering. Although you can add some wood to create a hard point for covering, Mark suggested a simple solution. Cut your covering larger than the diameter so you have plenty to hold on to. Center the covering and then push firmly over the exposed splines, slightly denting the covering.

Take a soldering pencil and carefully burn a hole at the location of each spline. Now position the covering over the servos with the splines in the three holes. Use a covering iron to attach the covering around the servo bay. Gently tighten the covering in the servo bay.

Proceed to cover the rest of the bottom of the wing, wrapping the covering completely over the edge of the outer ring. Cover the top, allowing roughly 1/8 inch of covering to fold around the bottom of the outer ring.

Attach the upper and lower fins with thin CA glue. Hinge the rudder and elevons with thin strips of CA hinge material. The landing gear and final motor mount were attached with 5-minute epoxy.

The ESC slides into the compartment in the wing. The motor is attached with four screws. The wheels are held in place with four laser-cut plywood disks. Use gap-filling CA adhesive to glue the disks to the wire. Decorate your The Saucerus RC with an eye toward easy visual recognition. You need to be able to see it!

Bend a little bit of tow-in on the landing gear to aid in tracking on the ground. Make absolutely sure that the elevons move exactly the same amount in each direction for both the aileron and elevator. I set the exponential at 30% for high rate and at 20% for the low rate. So far I have not switched to low rates.




Control horns and pushrods have been installed. The kit includes a complete hardware package.




This depicts the battery compartment and motor mount. The front of the canopy attaches to the pins and is held in place with magnets.


Balancing

Balance is hypercritical. The center of gravity (CG) should start out at the rear edge of the LE sheeting and no farther back. For the first flights, I added 2.25 ounces of lead directly behind the motor mount. If I were to do it again, I would not attach the lower cowl sheeting before checking the balance because this area is a great place to put any needed lead.


Flying

My first flights were emotional. The machine was unpredictable. Its worst characteristic was a tendency to tuck under from level flight.

The second landing was more of an arrival that bent the landing gear and broke the wheels. I added another 1/2 ounce to the nose, bringing the added weight to 2.75 ounces.

The third and fourth flights were simply amazing! I experienced no bad tendencies. After talking with Mark, I added some aileron-to-rudder mix. It made turning easier, but rolls were more like corkscrews. I have moved the aileron-to-rudder mix to a switch to be able to turn it off in flight.

So what should you expect on your first flights? If possible, find a smooth area for your first takeoff. Advance the throttle with a touch of down-elevator to get the tail up. That will get the rudder working (remember there is no steerable tail wheel). It will accelerate quickly and with only a little up-elevator, you will have The Saucerus RC airborne.

At full throttle, The Saucerus RC is extremely fast, so expect to quickly get the throttle to midrange as you check the trims. With a 1:1 aspect ratio, you will be working and coordinating the controls, yet at slow speed and high angle-of-attack, flight is easy and stable. Expect to work the throttle to get maximum flight performance and enjoyment.

It will turn well with only the rudder. Rolls with the mix turned off are axial. Loops, Immelmanns, Cuban 8s, and Spilt S maneuvers are all easy. Inverted flight needs virtually no down-elevator. It is plenty fast, so keep the throttle at midrange for most of your flying.

Landings are easy. Simply keep adding up-elevator until touchdown. The Saucerus RC can be flown in small areas, including indoor soccer fields.

The Saucerus RC will draw attention wherever you go. It is small enough to fit in a subcompact car.

Make sure that you have your model decorated in such a way to be able to maintain orientation. The CG is critical, so make sure it is correct before your first flight. A gyro stabilization system could be considered, but is not required.

This is a fun project and it is extremely durable. Building is easy with all of the laser-cut parts. You can get quite creative with the color scheme. You should enjoy building and flying The Saucerus RC from Retro RC.

—Joe Hass
joehass@gmail.com


Manufacturer/Distributor:

Retro RC
(248) 212-9666
www.retrorc.us.com


Sources:

Tactic
(800) 637-7660
www.tacticrc.com

Hitec/Multiplex
(858) 748-6948
www.hitecrcd.com

Buddy RC
(614) 824-7250
www.buddyrc.com

Turnigy
www.turnigy.com



The Keystone Bomber

$
0
0


Written by Donald R. Kling
The last of the Army Air Corps bombers
Construction article
Photos by the author
As seen in the October 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.




Download free plans!




Click here for full-size plans of various sizes (8 PDFs in .zip fomat)
Click here for tiled plans 8.5" x 11" (8 sets in .zip format)


Keystone I: 1/12 scale specifications

Wingspan: 74.75 inches
Length: 48.75 inches
Weight: 12 pounds
Motors: Two E-flite Power 32 brushless outrunners
Batteries: Two 4,000 mAh 4S LiPos
Controllers: Two E-flite 60-amp ESCs
Covering: Sig Coverall
Paint: Latex


Keystone II: 1/8 scale specifications

Wingspan: 112 inches
Wing chord: 12 inches
Length: 72.5 inches
Weight: 24 pounds
Motors: Two ElectriFly RimFire .80s
Batteries: Two Turnigy 5,000 mAh 5S LiPos
Dihedral: 3.25°
Sweep back: 4°
Receiver battery: Six-volt 2,000 mAh NiMH


About the Keystone Bomber

When my father passed away, he left behind a panoramic photograph taken in 1932 at Langley Field, Virginia, of the U.S. Army Air Corps (USAAC) 2nd Bombardment Group 59th Service Squadron, in which he served as a mechanic. Behind the group are three aircraft: a Keystone B-4, a Martin XB-907, and a Keystone B-6.

Close inspection with a magnifying glass revealed that the airplane on the left is a B-4 named “Columbia” (serial number 141). The Martin XB-907 was identifiable by its twin-engine monowing design, the engine cowlings, and its lack of a nose turret. The aircraft on the far right, the B-6, was easy to identify because it had “Pittsburgher” (serial number 167) painted on its nose.

The B-4 and B-6 differed only in their engine types. The fabric-covered aircraft had twin nine-cylinder radial engines, were built in Bristol, Pennsylvania, and were the last bi-wing bombers ordered by the USAAC. The aircraft were used for only six years until they were rendered obsolete by the Martin B-10 monowing.

In 2003, I acted on a latent interest in model airplanes, began flying, and the seeds of building were sown. The internet proved a valuable resource for information. I also found publications with Keystone articles that included a listing of all of the Keystones built, by model and serial number. This proved the data on the nose, where the aircraft were assigned, and their disposition (wrecked, surveyed, etc.).

There were also scale drawings of the side, top, and bottom views with engine and strut detail—enough to make one think about attempting to build the airplane. In the course of researching the aircraft, I found no evidence that there had been a flying model built, nor
were there any of the original aircraft
in existence.

At Barksdale Global Power Museum in Louisiana, I learned that there was an original section of a Keystone found in 1984 by airmen hiking in the woods at the base. They came across a metal framework that was later identified as the tail section of a Keystone Bomber, probably from the late 1930s when Keystones were flown there and used as bombing targets. The wreckage was donated to Shreveport, Louisiana, to help support a war reclamation effort; however, one tail section was missed and remained undiscovered for nearly 50 years.

The section now occupies a prominent diorama area in the museum—the last remnant anywhere in the world. The fabric is gone, but the framework remains in good condition. The aircraft’s serial number is known and has been promised to me. At the time of this writing, I had not yet received that information from the museum curator.

An excellent plastic model of a Keystone B-4, built by George Lee, resides in the U.S. Air Force Museum at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, in Dayton, Ohio, in a glass case underneath the nose of a Martin B-10! The detail on George’s model is superb and served as a guide for my project.

I took diagrams from a magazine to a blueprint shop to have them enlarged to 1/12 scale. That would equate to a 74-inch wingspan, which would be ideal for an RC model. In measuring the magazine pages, I erroneously assigned them 1/96 scale. The enlarged prints were deemed inaccurate, too fuzzy, and unusable, so I began the task of hand drawing the plans.

It took several years to create usable drawings that I could build on because I was still in the workforce and often traveled. The time I spent on the project was limited. The first fuselage was constructed in left and right halves, but I found a flaw that I couldn’t correct or live with, so fuselage number two made its way to the board.

Deciding how to power the airplane and engineer the wing arrangement became a priority, because it directly influenced the fuselage construction. I decided to make the wings in three sections, with a permanent center and detachable outer sections for ease of transport. The wings had a slight sweepback and dihedral that began at the same point—perfect for the outer section attachment point.

At 1/12 scale, the flat-bottom airfoil was 1 inch. The engine nacelles were suspended between the upper and lower wings, so I decided that glow power was out of the question. There wasn’t room for fuel tanks in the wings, and I felt that the fuel lines from the fuselage would be too long, so electric power was my best option.

The outer wing sections attach to the center section using mating brass tubing. They are secured with a spring-loaded plywood hook that snaps into a slot on the mating wing section. A paper clip through a tiny hole in the center section end rib depresses the hook and releases the wing for disassembly.




The author detailed the dummy engines to give the model a more finished look.




The outer wing sections attach to the center section using mating brass tubing that is secured with a spring-loaded plywood hook that snaps into a slot on the mating wing section. A paper clip inserted through a tiny hole in the center section end rib depresses the hook and releases the wing
for disassembly.


I mounted hardwood blocks with 2-56 or 4-40 blind nuts in areas where the airfoil-shaped aluminum struts and the cabane struts attached to the fuselage. Fourteen-gauge wire located between the ESCs and the motors is encased by struts. Three wires were required. Two fit in the main strut to the engine nacelle and the third in one of the thinner struts to the lower part of the fuselage at the wing’s trailing edge.

The fit is tight because the struts are reinforced with flat carbon-fiber stock. The nose section, also a gun turret, is removable—exposing slide rails for battery tray installation and removal.

This model flew on Memorial Day 2012 at the Arizona Model Aviators’ field in Mesa, Arizona, and was piloted by Phil Todd. Although it flew and landed without incident, it was slightly underpowered.

The Power 32 E-flite motors and Zippy 5,000 mAh 4S LiPo batteries performed well, but were outmatched by the additional weight needed to balance the airplane—roughly 12 pounds. The construction of
the nacelles didn’t allow for larger motors, so I retired what would become known as Keystone I.


1/8-Scale Keystone B-4

Approximately 18 months later, I completed the 1/8-scale Keystone B-4 (Keystone II) with several internal modifications. The construction techniques were generally the same and that saved time. I reinforced the spars with carbon-fiber tape and made the flying wires functional, giving greater strength to the wings that are joined and supported by a 3/4-inch dowel-filled PVC pipe.

Larger ElectriFly RimFire .80 motors, Turnigy 5,000 mAh 5S LiPo batteries, and three-blade 15 x 7 Master Airscrew propellers for each motor provided sufficient power for the 24-pound airplane. It drew roughly 50 amps at full throttle.

Pull-pull control linkages were used for the elevator and rudder, and the aileron servos are mounted in the wings. All servos are JR analog with the exception of the rudder servo, which is a Hitec HS-5485HB digital.




The larger of the two Keystone models under construction.




The author with the 1/8- and 1/12-scale versions of the Keystone.


The 1/8-scale model made its maiden flight on December 30, 2014, at the flying field in Mesa. This was my first experience with a biplane and multiengine. My thanks go to Charles Nelson, from Massachusetts, for lending his expertise in locating flight-threatening imperfections and his invaluable advice on biplane flight characteristics.

Both airplanes are entirely scratch-built, although I did have 120 ribs laser cut for the larger model. The aircraft are covered with Sig Koverall, primed, painted with ordinary latex house paint, and finished with a clear coat.

I doubted that there would be any color photos of the original airplane, but I was able to locate a color drawing that served as a second guide for my model. The Keystone’s original olive drab and yellow colors are documented, so they were easy to reproduce. Surprisingly, in the 13 years since I began the project, I have never heard of another flight-capable Keystone model.




Both models were painted with ordinary latex house paint and finished in clear coat. This is the 74.75-inch wingspan Keystone.


Keystone bombers began life in the pioneer days of flying, had no combat history, and were relegated into obscurity by the aircraft of World War II. Kits were not available for this model and I wanted to build it, so my only option was to scratch-build.

My hope is that this model will kindle enthusiasm so that others can experience the thrill of bringing a forgotten airplane back to life!

—Donald Kling
don.2650@gmail.com


Sources

Maiden flight video
www.youtube.com/watch?v=h94sTB_n014



Meet longtime Nats competitor and AMA scholarship recipient Bob Hanford

$
0
0


Written by Rachelle Haughn
Meet longtime Nats competitor and AMA scholarship recipient Bob Hanford
Written by Rachelle Haughn
Photos by the author
An extended interview from the October 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


AMA is celebrating a huge milestone. This year, it reached $1 million in total scholarship money awarded. In honor of this achievement, Model Aviation is highlighting some of the recipients of these funds.

AMA awarded its first scholarship in 1970. To learn who else received a scholarship in the early years of the program, read the list of scholarship winners from 1970 to 1995.

Robert “Bob” Hanford was one of three modelers who received scholarship money in 1971. He was awarded $500, which he used to earn a bachelor of science in civil engineering from Oklahoma State University.

“It paid most of my first year’s tuition—how times have changed!” Bob said of the scholarship. He applied for an AMA scholarship when he was a senior in high school. “It was a tremendous help. My parents divorced about that time, and weren’t able to help with college expenses.”

After participating in the 2016 Free Flight Nats, Bob said that he competed in his first Nats in 1964 when he was 11 years old. His father, a member of the 1949 US Wakefield Team, taught him how to build and fly at the age of eight.

Bob’s aeromodeling experience has aided him in his career as a licensed professional engineer, and in his current position as a manager of a civil/structural engineering company. “The aeromodeling background definitely helped—knowing how to read and prepare drawings, spatial relations, strength of materials, and direct structural applications as I had experienced in modeling,” he commented.

Nearly a half-dozen years before he was named as one of the first recipients of an AMA scholarship, Robert “Bob” Hanford was testing his flying skills at the Nats.

Bob’s father, also named Bob Hanford, taught him how to fly model aircraft and he entered his first contest at the age of eight. His dad also was a member of the 1949 US Wakefield Team.

The younger Bob continued to build and fly and competed in his first Nats, known back then as the Navy Nats, at age 11. That contest was held in 1964 at the Dallas Naval Air Station. Bob has many fond memories of that competition, and enjoyed reminiscing after participating in the 2016 Free Flight (FF) Nats, held at AMA Headquarters in Muncie, Indiana.

“I got my picture in our local paper for towing an A-1 glider into the runway. I was pictured holding the broken airplane with the caption, ‘Tulsan’s Glider Crashes.’ Infamous,” he commented about the 1964 Nats.

“In addition to the 1964 Nats, I was fortunate enough to attend three other Navy Nats—Olathe, Kansas in 1968, and Chicago in 1970 and 1971. Due to college, career, and family, I didn’t attend another one until Lincoln Nebraska in 1987.

“The unified Nats ended in 1988 when the Free Flight site owner changed his mind at Tidewater, so the makeup Nats for the Free Flight events was held in Lawrenceville, Illinois, which I was able to attend.

“The next two Free Flight Nats were also held there, referred to as the United States Outdoor Championships. When the AMA moved HQ to Muncie [Indiana] and held the first Nats there in 1991, I was there and have been there every year since.

“One year, the official Nats was held out in Washington state, which I did not make, and in 1994, they were in Lubbock, Texas, which I did attend. So 33 [Nats] in all, but the most memorable were the Navy Nats. It’s a shame that all modelers haven’t had the opportunity to experience them—not just for the flying, but for the central focus of each of those.

“[I remember] the hangar … rows and rows of tables, where everyone would bring everything out of their cars, spread it all out on and under the tables, and leave it there all week without a second thought. It would take an hour or two just to walk up and down all the rows, admiring and examining everything.

“There would be people up all night working on stuff for the next day, running engines, test-flying in the parking lot. I left a couple of Indoor gliders stuck in the rafters of the Chicago hangar.

“You could also stay in the barracks and eat in the mess hall. [It was] truly memorable, and I hope my recollections have sparked memories for others who attended.”

Bob’s interest and experience in aviation and involvement in AMA helped him be selected as one of the 1971 recipients of an AMA scholarship. The scholarship money assisted in paying for his education at Oklahoma State University, where he earned a degree in civil engineering.

Although many years have passed since Bob graduated from college, his passion for model aviation has not faded.

“There are so many ways to serve the hobby—from volunteering as a contest organizer, publishing articles and plans, photographing events, working at AMA, to running a cottage industry, which we’ve become so dependent upon with the demise of hobby shops,” Bob said.

“The camaraderie cannot be compared. I have friends all across the country, many of whom I’ve known for more than 50 years. I think model airplanes is the greatest hobby I could have had—a lifelong endeavor that has so many of life’s lessons. It teaches how to work with your hands, analytical thinking, problem solving, trial-and-error applications, and dealing with adversity, because things aren’t always going to go your way.

“There’s also an aspect of teamwork that can be learned, as well as being gracious in both victory and defeat. Many in this hobby will do whatever they can to help you beat them—rarely seen in other types of competition. Personally, I enjoy competing, but it’s not the same for everyone. You can also find it rewarding to keep improving your personal bests, particularly when flying indoors, or just the simple joy of seeing something you’ve created actually fly by itself.

“Thank you for the opportunity to reminisce on so many fond memories.”



AMA News: District VI - October 2016

$
0
0


Written by Randy Cameron
Jets Over Kentucky 2016 and AMA government relations
As seen in the October 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Jets Over Kentucky 2016

This past month, I was honored to attend Jets Over Kentucky, held at the Lebanon-Springfield Airport in Lebanon, Kentucky. I met up with Bob Gautreaux, the Sedalia RC Flyers club president, who showed me around and introduced me to Lewis Patton, the event contest director.

Lewis has done a great job of managing and building this event into the premier jet event. I believe there were more than 150 registered pilots, including the youngest RC jet pilot, Jayleigh, there with her Frozen-themed jet and her father, Jose Melendez, an AMA District V associate vice president and sales manager for Jet Central USA.




Lewis Patton (R) and I at the Jets Over Kentucky event.



Jayleigh with her Frozen-themed jet.


Throughout Wednesday, I kept hearing about an SR-71 Blackbird that would make an appearance on Thursday. I have only seen one other RC SR-71 fly in the past—a twin ducted-fan model—at an event called the Show Me R/C Extravaganza, held in Jefferson City, Missouri, approximately 16 or 17 years ago. It was flown by Lance Campbell.

Much to my surprise, on Thursday, Lance appeared with his current SR-71 Blackbird, with twin turbines. It is so impressive that last year Lance was invited to an SR-71 pilots’ reunion. While there, with his Blackbird, many of the SR-71 pilots signed the bottom of the hatch.




Lance Campbell’s SR-71 Blackbird.



Bonus photos

You can also go to my Flickr account to see the good with the bad pictures in the shared album of Jets Over Kentucky at https://flic.kr/s/aHskEhXjzp.


Model Aviation Magazine - October 2016 AMA News District VI Bonus Photos


AMA government relations

Recently, many of you may have seen that Earl Lawrence, FAA’s Director of UAS Integration, provided Dave Mathewson and the AMA with a letter explaining that, when following the guidelines and rules of the AMA, an FAA-recognized community-based organization, we are allowed to fly our aircraft more than 400 feet above ground level.

He also stressed that the 400-foot limit is a recommendation, not a regulation, and that the FAA has responsibility for the safety of the airspace for manned aircraft and the FAA may pursue enforcement action against model operators who endanger the safety of the national airspace. The letter can be seen at http://amablog.modelaircraft.org/amagov/files/2016/07/FAA-400feet.pdf.

This is good news for modelers, however, we must police ourselves to ensure that we don’t interfere with manned aircraft.

Happy flying!



AMA News: District VII - October 2016

$
0
0


Written by Bob Kane / Tim Jesky
National Model Aviation Day, club visits, and the 8th Annual Toledo Weak Signals Precision Aerobatics Contest
As seen in the October 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Club visits and National Model Aviation Day

Here we meet again. I’m writing this fresh off a road trip that took me to Iowa for a National Model Aviation Day event hosted by the Ottumwa RC Flyers, and a visit to the Madison Area Radio Control Society (MARCS) of Madison, Wisconsin.

I can tell you that a 1,500-mile ride will put you back in touch with all the stuff that you knew ached on your body, plus a few new ones that you didn’t. I’m glad my good buddy and Wisconsin associate vice president, Marc “Doc” Shelstrom, traveled along to keep me company.

It’s always a good time for me to visit clubs, reconnect with old friends, and make a few new ones. Before I forget, a big thanks to Mike Anderson of the MARCS for letting (and trusting) me to wiggle the sticks on his airplane. I’m happy to report that the model was in the same number of pieces when I gave him back the transmitter as it was when he handed it over to me.

Getting back to the National Model Aviation Day event in Ottumwa, all I can say is thank you to the club, pilots, and the entire town for coming out and supporting the event. There will be plenty more to share with you in a future column.

Just for a quick teaser, here’s a photo of Navy Lt. Kevin Schaeffer (Ret.) and Army SFC Steve Workman (Ret.) speaking at the Ottumwa convention center as part of the celebration. They were both at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, when American Airlines flight 77 was flown into it.





Rather than running from the danger, SFC Workman ran back into the flames and carried critically injured Kevin to safety, saving his life. It’s really not possible for me to fully describe what an inspiring and emotional moment their talk was.

As I noted earlier, there’s more about this event to come. Take a look your event calendars and consider holding a National Model Aviation Day event at your local club. It’s a great way to celebrate a day of flying with your friends and family.


The 8th Annual Toledo Weak Signals Precision Aerobatics Contest

Moving on, my longtime friend Bob Kane put together a Precision Aerobatics contest this summer and reports on it:



The 8th Annual Toledo Weak Signals Precision Aerobatics Contest was held August 6-7, 2016, at the club’s field in LaSalle, Michigan. We had 26 pilots at this year’s event from several states and Canada. The events flown were AMA classes Sportsman, Intermediate, Advanced, Masters, and also FAI, the international class flown at world competitions.

We used the Peter Vogel Pattern Scoring System for the first time at this contest. Peter’s system uses WiFi-connected iPad Touch devices, which the judges use to track deductions during a pilot’s flight. The scores are recorded on the iPad and transmitted at the conclusion of a flight to a scoring laptop running Scott Smith’s Master Scoring software.





Mother Nature served two beautiful days for the contest. There were blue skies, temperatures in the mid-80s, and a light crosswind just strong enough to make wind correction important for a good flight. We were able to get four rounds in on Saturday and two rounds in on Sunday, making it a full six-round contest.







We also had three father-son combinations this weekend: Bill and Greyson Pritchett; Bryan and Matt Finley; and Mark and Sean Atwood. It is always great to see aircraft activities spanning generations.

I want to thank the Toledo Weak Signals club members for graciously hosting the contest and Tim and Linda Jesky for their support and for opening up their home for a Friday evening reception. Thanks also to Joe and Robert Jesky for assisting during the weekend.



Take a kid flying.









Intermediate

1)Jay T Snider 4000.00
2) Lucky Macy 3908.00
3)Bryan Finley 3809.42
4)Valentin Kieriechenko 3590.74
5)George Gordon 0486.42


Advanced

1)William Pritchett 4000.00
2)Mike Gaishin 3955.74
3)W. Anthony Abdullah 3880.04
4)Mike Murphy 3848.59
5)Lewis McNickle 3788.78
6)Ronald Hansen 3781.66
7)Lynn Morgan 3669.39
8)Steve Stricker 3587.28


Masters

1)Daniel Landis 3992.85
2)Verne Koester 3980.40
3)Greyson Pritchett 3943.42
4)Brenner Sharp 3889.02
5)Sean Atwood 3787.14
6)Matt Finley 3760.62
7)David Johnstone 3755.25
8)Charles Edwards 3700.72
9)William Kutchell 3503.09
10)Robert Kane 3415.16


FAI

1)Mark Atwood 2000.00
2)Ken Velez 1990.87
3)Harry Ells 1921.84





Stevens AeroModel 4 Charlie

$
0
0


Written by Tom Sullivan
An enjoyable small-field RC model
Abridged product review
Photos by the author
Read the full product review in the October 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.



Bonus video


Specifications

Model type: Short kit sport model
Wingspan: 42 inches
Airfoil: Flat bottom
Length: 30 inches
Weight: 16 ounces
Power system: Park BL400 brushless motor; 25-amp ESC; Kinexsis 2S 1,100 mAh LiPo
Radio: Four-channel; four submicro servos
Flight time: 8 to 10 minutes (aerobatics); 12 to 14 minutes (cruising)
Price: Laser-cut parts $60; upgrades (windscreen, landing gear, decals, plans) $25


Pluses

Laser-cut parts that fit together extremely well.
Well-thought-out construction aligns parts properly and easily.
Can be framed up in a couple of evenings.
Cockpit floor and pilot double as a battery hatch.


Minus

Ground handling could be improved by using a tail wheel.


Abridged product review

Because all of us are in a building frame of mind for this issue, my contribution is different from a traditional kit. It’s a short kit from Stevens AeroModel called the 4Charlie. If you’re not familiar with a short kit, it simply means that all of the parts that would be tricky to cut out are supplied. A builder supplies his or her own balsa sheeting, strips, hardware, etc.

Doing things this way doesn’t necessarily keep the cost down, but it does allow a builder to use the quality of wood and hardware that he or she prefers, rather than trying to make do with what might come with the kit.

What comes in this short kit? It contains several balsa sheets of varying thicknesses, which have laser-cut ribs, formers, supports, and blocking pieces. Also included is a piece of laser-cut cardboard.




If you read the instructions and plans carefully, your Stevens AeroModel 4Charlie should look similar to what is shown here. From opening the box to completely framing the model will take only a few hours or a few nights of relaxing building.


The instructions and plans were supplied as part of this review, but must be purchased separately as part of Stevens AeroModel’s balsabuilder publication, volume 1, issue 2. Ten pages of the 60-page publication are devoted to the 4Charlie.

Other topics covered in this issue are several building features, a couple of other construction articles, and some flight tips. Instead of being a step-by-step description of where each piece is glued, it is more of a general guide of how the construction should progress. It is up to the builder to be able to read and interpret plans to properly complete the kit.

Learn more about building with the 2015 MA Construction Series


The Model Aviation Construction Series, first published in 2015, is collection of eleven installments taking a new builder through every step of the building process, from setting up a workspace to covering a newly-constructed model!

Download the entire series in PDF format!

On the subject of plans, the 4Charlie plans are fantastic. Actually, the only way they would be better is if they were rolled rather than folded, but that’s a minor detail. The plans are well drawn and extremely detailed. The parts fit exactly over the drawings and everything clearly showed how the aircraft fit together.

By the way, please spend the extra few bucks and purchase the decal pack. It includes the instrument panel, but more importantly, it has decals for that cool-looking double-sided pilot. The pilot figure acts as a handle to easily install and remove the magnetic battery hatch.

Even more than that, the cartoon pilot figure really brings the 4Charlie together, as the cockpit would look bland without it.

If you’re wondering why this kit is called 4Charlie, I was too, until I read the story that’s printed alongside the construction article. I won’t spoil it here, but it also gives a bit of insight into the spark behind the design.




The author recommends paying a few extra dollars for the decal kit. That pilot not only adds some fun and whimsy to the 4Charlie, but it doubles as a battery hatch handle.


Before building the 4Charlie, I made sure that I had the materials I needed. These consisted of several sizes of 36-inch balsa strips, landing gear hardware, micro control hardware, a hardwood dowel and, of course, the radio and power system.

One thing I found missing from the instructions and plans was any reference to making an exit for airflow over the battery. If you use the battery hatch, it completely covers the cockpit area, blocking any chance for the air to escape.

I cut out a bit of the covering on the underside of the fuselage, toward the back. Granted, this power setup won’t be pulling a lot of amps, potentially causing overheating problems, but some airflow over the ESC and battery is needed.


Construction

Read more in Model Aviation.

Author Tom Sullivan gives you more information on his experiences building the 4 Charlie. Subscribe to Model Aviation or join AMA and read his full product review in the October 2016 issue!


Flying

With the exception of some ground looping during the first takeoff, the 4Charlie’s maiden flight was about as uneventful as you could hope. (I mention the ground loops because there is a tail skid rather than a tail wheel, slightly limiting steering on the ground.)

After a few clicks of trim, the model was flying level and hands off at half power. The best way I could describe the speed and how 4Charlie flies would be a cruiser. It’s certainly not overpowered and doesn’t fly particularly fast, which made it easy to grab the necessary flight shots.

One area where I differed from the plans was not limiting the amount of servo travel for the control surfaces. I left them all at full throw, but dialed in a fair amount of exponential: 30% elevator, 25% ailerons, and 10% rudder. It turned out to be perfect for my taste, allowing me to maneuver the 4Charlie in some tight spaces with no problems.

Basic aerobatics are possible, but you have to work at them to keep your speed up. Because of the flat-bottom airfoil, rolls and inverted passes require a touch of down-elevator and throttle to keep the 4Charlie level when upside down. From level flight, loops are slightly egg-shaped, as are half or full Cuban 8s. I feel that the 4Charlie is best suited for cruising.

Whether a few mistakes high or on a low-level pass, the model looks great simply putting along at 1/2 to 5/8 throttle. The wind will bump it around some because it only weighs 16 ounces, but buzzing the runway on low-level passes during the late evening hours is a real treat.

Because the 4Charlie displays no bad stall tendencies when properly balanced, touch-and-gos and landings are a breeze. Simply line up on the runway, slowly lower the throttle, and fly it down to an easy, main gear landing every time. Be ready for a ground loop after the tail skid touches down on a paved surface, but it’s a quick, harmless spin.




The tail skid is an inexpensive and lightweight way to keep the rear of the fuselage off the ground. Be mindful that crosswind landings and takeoffs can be quite eventful. Choose to go straight into the wind for the best results.


Flight time on a 1,200 mAh LiPo battery pack is roughly 10 minutes, depending on how much you push the throttle. For simply cruising, I think it’s possible to extend it upward of 13 to 15 minutes, although I haven’t tried that yet.


In Conclusion

Stevens AeroModel’s 4Charlie is a great build. I wouldn’t suggest it as your first build, but maybe a second or third. Its small size gives you a chance to fly at a variety of parks, schools, fields, and even at your local RC club. Rise-off-the-ground takeoffs or hand launching are both options, depending on your field.

As I mentioned, the 4Charlie certainly isn’t overpowered, but it has enough power to have a ball. So, if you’re thinking about building a small electric-powered model with a good deal of character, or maybe you’re merely looking for a model you can build in a few evenings, I encourage you to give the Stevens AeroModel 4Charlie a look.

—Tom Sullivan
tmsullivan80@gmail.com


Manufacturer/Distributor

Stevens AeroModel
(719) 387-4187
www.stevensaero.com


Sources

Landing Products
(530) 661-0399
www.apcprop.com

Spektrum
(800) 338-4639
www.spektrumrc.com

ElectriFly
(800) 637-7660
www.electrifly.com

Du-Bro
(800) 848-9411.
www.dubro.com




AMA News: District IV - October 2016

$
0
0


Written by Scott McClurg / Jay Marsh
AMA government relations and Warbirds Over Delaware 2016
As seen in the October 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


AMA government relations

Many good things have happened for model aviation recently: AMA member exemption from the FAA’s final sUAS Rule (Part 107), FAA recognizing AMA’s role as a community-based organization, clarifying flight above 400 feet under appropriate circumstances, and both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives passing a 14-month FAA extension recognizing the importance of AMA and our strong commitment to safety.

This is all because of the persistence of our AMA Government and Regulatory Affairs Team, headed up by Rich Hanson. Let them know you appreciate their efforts on your behalf.


Warbirds Over Delaware

Scott McClurg sent in this report on the 25th anniversary of Warbirds Over Delaware.

For those who don’t know, Warbirds Over Delaware, put on by the Delaware R/C Club, is a combination Scale warbird fun-fly and air show. It attracts some of the best and most famous pilots and builders in the nation and it has a dedicated following.

The event has evolved and grown since beginning in the summer of 1992. There has to be something special to convince pilots to drive as much as 16 hours and face sweltering Delaware summers year after year. It’s the camaraderie. Everyone who goes to Warbirds Over Delaware goes to kick back, relax, have fun, see friends, and meet their idols, building friendships that last a lifetime.




A rainbow across Warbirds Over Delware.


This sense of fellowship was best exemplified this year in Roger Spoor. Roger was a member of Tidewater RC and had attended Warbirds Over Delaware 13 times. Unfortunately, in March, Roger was told by doctors that he only had a short time to live. Warbirds Over Delaware was almost four months away, but it was Roger’s last wish that he come see us all one more time, so he held strong and left hospice to attend.

Roger arrived with his wife, Jill, on Wednesday. His own club members had helped a lot by transporting his airplanes, and everyone from the Delaware R/C Club and Roger’s own club came together to look after him and arranged a canopy so he could watch the show from the flightline. Roger had the time of his life and every time I saw him, he was smiling from ear to ear.




Roger Spoor (center) with his award from Warbirds Over Delaware.


Contest directors Dave and Pete Malchione honored Roger with an award on Saturday morning. There, in front of everyone, Dave gave Roger his award and told him, “You are Warbirds Over Delaware.” With a big smile on his face, Roger addressed the crowd and told them, “This has been the greatest part of my life.” Roger passed away just a few days after arriving home from the event.

It’s also the awesomeness of Warbirds Over Delaware that makes it special, the flying of beautiful Giant Scale military aircraft—everything from World War I to modern jets—the Gaggle, the Scramble, and the raffles. Spectators could purchase a pit pass and talk with the pilots and see the airplanes up close.




From World War I ...




... to modern jets.


Everyone enjoyed the noon air show on Saturday, put on by the pilots attending Warbirds Over Delaware. Children ages 10 to 14 were given a chance to fly Andy Kane’s 50% scale clipped-wing Cub using a buddy box, while their parents and hundreds of spectators watched.

The 25th anniversary didn’t disappoint and we are looking forward to the 26th, so plan to attend.

To see more photos and videos of the event, or find out more about the Delaware R/C Club, visit www.Facebook.com/WarbirdsOverDelaware and www.delawarerc.org.


Bonus video



Go fly and have fun safely.



Award-winning aircraft finishes

$
0
0


Written by Dan Grotzinger
Tips to take your model to the next level
How-to article
Photos by Jay Smith and Matt Ruddick
An extended article from the October 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


After seeing magazine coverage of the Best of Show and Best Finish winners at The Toledo Show: R/C Model Expo, held in Toledo, Ohio, when I was a kid, I usually felt a sense of awe and respect for what they represented. Gradually, a thought germinated in my mind: maybe, someday, I could do that.

This is a good place to clarify an important issue. You don’t build and paint an award-winning model to win a prize—you do it for yourself. We all appreciate positive feedback, but if I were alone on an island, I would still do the same work. Excellence of workmanship is a craftsman’s reward.

I grew up in the hobby during the 1960s on Control Line (CL) “Stunters,” that featured silk and dope finishes. There was no CA glue, no MonoKote, and no ARFs. You did the heavy lifting or bought someone else’s airplane.

Some of the best CL Stunt (Precision Aerobatics) aircraft were hand-rubbed (sanded with fine-grit sandpaper and then rubbed with polishing compound), because Stunt has a finishing component to its scoring.

In those days, AeroGloss was the gold standard. Your airplane could have a beautiful satin finish in two or three weeks by using a brush and no buffing. Butyrate dope often required buffing because it did not flow out and shine as well. AeroGloss was excellent for brushed-in repairs that became invisible without the need to paint an entire area.

Unfortunately, AeroGloss went through a progression of formula changes that rendered it inferior. Except for clear, which I still use to attach silk and tissue, it is no longer available.

My first hand-rubbed finish was with Sig Manufacturing dope in 1987. The dope was tricky to use because freshly applied coats would soften already sanded layers, reintroducing surface imperfections that required additional coats of an already heavy product.

Using clear nitrate in the base layers’ buildup somewhat alleviated this problem. Sig dope tends to shrink and pulls up at tail fillets. Much of the paint applied to the fillets must be sanded off until the final coat to reduce paint buildup and solve shrinking.

Next, I tried K&B epoxy and was pleased. The biggest problem with it was the slow cure and resulting tendency to attract dust. Sometimes it would attain an “orange peel” (a texture that resembles the skin of an orange) or “fisheye” (small circular, crater-like openings) appearance, a trait that seems common to epoxy paints. These traits make rubbing an attractive option.

I’ve tried water and particulate filters in the spray system, as well as surface preparations suggested by professionals, with limited success. The best prevention beyond that is applying thin, wet coats. After I had used it twice, K&B went off the market.

The next product that I tried was Chevron Perfect Paint. I had excellent results on several warbirds using the military flats. That product is also no longer available. Since then, I’ve used several others, including Rust-Oleum and automotive products—all with mixed results.

Each product has a learning curve with various pros and cons. There is no perfect paint. As with all things, you must work with each product’s strengths. Imagine my surprise and delight when Klass Kote epoxy appeared at the Toledo Show and was advertised to be interchangeable with K&B and Hobbypoxy paint components. I bought some and used it on a scratch-built Senior Skylark Twin with excellent results.

Because rib structure is a prominent feature of the Skylark/Falcon family of wings (no sheeting), it is not advised to rub out the finish. A consistent rubbing procedure would cut small valleys into the finish at the edges of the ribs, risking sand-through. Not rubbing the ribs would create inconsistent areas of polish and shine.

Careful application of a thin top coat resulted in a satisfactory final finish. A couple of unsightly dirt specks were spot sanded and polished without being noticeable.

How did I end up at the Toledo Show with a Best Finish winner? Everything came together. I had been collecting, building, and painting vintage airplanes when I discovered the Vintage RC Society (VRCS). The group has a Concours competition category, which encourages building vintage models “as they were in the day.” In 2009, VRCS was awarded its own category at Toledo. Competing against the best at a national level forced me to improve.

Throughout the years, the passing of many modeling friends impressed upon me that the time we have to do the things we wish might be limited. In 2013, I had problems that led to surgery, which convinced me even more.

Although I only competed in Pattern (RC Aerobatics) for one year, I love aerobatics and practice like a competitor. I saw an old Mach 1 Pattern airplane for sale at a swap meet. I admired its lines and proportions in three dimensions, but it seemed too heavy. (I once had a kit, but hadn’t seen one built.)

Two rows later, I found an original Midwest Products Mach 1 kit for sale. I have had several foam core wing kits and let them all go because of my perceptions about weight and adhesive issues.

The seller of this kit gave me some useful information on bonding wing skins, which I will explain later. I saw the use of Klass Kote on a fully sheeted foam core wing as the ticket to the best finish I had done. I could sand and buff to my heart’s content with no ribs to worry about. Three days later, I was building. Passion, experience, urgency, and circumstance had intersected.

I am not a professional with the requisite training, information, facilities, and equipment. If I can do this, with patience and desire, so can any modeler. I’ll share with you what I’ve learned from my mistakes. Are you ready?

Let’s jump in!


Setting Up

An 8-gallon 125 psi compressor, a DeVilbiss touch-up paint gun, a Badger airbrush, and a carbon-filter breathing mask are my essential equipment. Slow-drying epoxy paint can be applied with an airbrush.

I use a stand that acts as a rotisserie by mounting it onto the model’s motor mounts. I usually have a checkerboard pattern on the bottom of the wing so that the top and bottom do not need to be sprayed at the same time.

If you need to spray both at once, standoffs can be mounted in the servo openings of the wings and in the openings for the wing bolts. You spray the bottom first, turn the wing over, setting it on the standoffs, and then spray the top. When spraying the bottom, place the wing on clean waxed paper to avoid carrying dust to the yet-to-be-sprayed top surface.


Applicable Building Tips

This is not a building article, but a few tips bear mentioning because a great finish is hard to accomplish over flaws. Use a metal straightedge and a sanding block to true-up as many joints as possible, trying to avoid putty.

Many glues can be sanded when the joint is 90° to the surface. A feathered joint, such as D-tube sheeting that wraps over the leading edge instead of butting against it, is another matter if the glue used is epoxy or CA. For this reason, I use Testors solvent-type wood cement in these situations. The glue and balsa will sand off at the same rate, leaving a clean joint instead of an unsightly hump.

The Mach 1 has 3-inch sheets that can be glued together for wing skins. If you use CA adhesive on your aircraft, you will have to sand too much to create a clean joint, leaving a valley that might not be visible until the final finishing. Use Testors cement or something similar, and then immediately wipe the excess off of the surface so you won’t have as much to sand.

I pin the sheets to force them tightly together and tape them to keep the joint flush. I do this on the building surface over waxed paper. Sand the skins before bonding them to the foam cores. Companies such as Balsa USA supply wing-width skins, eliminating this chore.

Most of the strength is in the skins, so if the grain is bad or the wood is too soft, replace it. Grain irregularities can be hard to see and judge, but can affect your finish. More paint will correct this, but it adds weight. Grain irregularities pose the biggest problem on the large surface of a wing, which will be similar to a mirror when you are done.

At night, when I think I am done sanding, I turn out the lights and leave a small television on. I sit roughly 12 feet away and hold the wing between the TV and myself so that the wing reflects light to me on a tangent. Different angles with varying amounts of light will show every variation and flaw that you missed in normal light. You can then lightly sand with 320-grit sandpaper.

This same sighting technique, sometimes referred to as candling, can be used in normal light to sand out each layer of paint. If you wait until the final coat to make these little corrections, the job will be harder and less effective.


Bonding Wing Skins

The Mach 1’s skins were bonded with Gorilla Glue. It does not debond over time or in the sun as contact cement does, and will not add weight as epoxy does. When properly done, there will be no messy excess.

Apply the glue to the wood skins, spreading it to a thin film with a credit card. If the wood “fuzzes up” and looks dry, you took too much glue off. Spread a little more. Using a spray-mist bottle, lightly wet the foam cores and rub the moisture around with a clean hand. This creates a surface tension that you will feel.

Glue the upper and lower skins to the cores at the same time, mounting them back in their foam carriers or castoffs. Because the wet wood expands, a warp can be introduced when doing one side at a time.

I used a thick glass table for this assembly, but any flat surface will work. The top of the assembly must also have a flat surface, and it needs to be weighted. A fair amount of weight that is equally distributed won’t crush or compress the cores.

Install straight pins through the skins into the foam in a few places to prevent creeping while curing. When done, there will be little excess glue pushed out. There also will be no humps or irregularities and it will be lightweight and strong. The remainder of the wing assembly will be a breeze and you will love the result.


Fiberglassing

The Mach 1 was fiberglassed using Sig .5-ounce and .7-ounce cloth. The heavier cloth is easier to handle, fill, and sand, but adds more weight. It was applied around the nose and wing fillets for durability, and on the top of the wing for a better surface texture. The lighter cloth was used on the remainder of the airplane. I used Zap Z-Poxy finishing resin for this project.

At this point you have a controversy and a decision to make. Some modelers thin the mixed resin 50/50 with denatured alcohol and brush it on like silking a wing with silk and dope. Some feel this softens the resulting finish, so they apply the resin using a squeegee and the toilet paper-blotting method. I prefer the thinning method because it is quicker, easier, neater, and lighter. I’m careful with my airplanes, so I rarely dent them.

This method quickly produces a good, lightweight surface. If you are prone to accidents, you might prefer the other method. Sometimes I apply a coat of clear dope to the wood before fiberglassing. This seals the wood and it seems to require less epoxy.

A dry fiberglass cloth is placed over the wood with roughly an inch of overhang past the desired fiberglassing area. The resin is brushed in, starting at the center and stroking outward in all directions. This prevents the material from bunching, rolling, and sliding. After it cures, the excess will sand off easily with 220-grit sandpaper.

Edges are easy, but end on a flat area that will easily feather out with sandpaper. The next piece can slightly overlap the first area, and it will also feather easily when cured. This lets you use pieces as big or as small as you want and the seams will disappear. I use fiberglass cloth on solid wood surfaces, no matter what paint I use or the size of the airplane.

In a rebuild or refinish, the old paint can be stripped with thinner—leaving your fiberglassed surface like new. The exception is epoxy, which must be sanded off.

After everything is covered, brush on a second coat of resin. It takes approximately six hours to be sandable. Start with 220-grit and end with 320-grit sandpaper. I take off the resin down to the surface of the cloth, so only the weave is filled.

You can feel when you get to this point and the sound of the sandpaper will become scratchier. Depending on the wood grain, the weight of cloth used, the consistency of your resin, and your brushing technique, you might be done or you could have a few pinholes and open grain. You can apply a third thin coat of resin with a lint-free cloth, or depend on your primer to fill these problems. I’ve done it both ways.

If you have a sand-through in the cloth, you might want to recoat that spot unless you are using epoxy primer (in which case it makes little difference). Some patience with the fiberglassing and sanding will give you a beautiful, lightweight base for your paint. The design weight of the Mach 1 is 8 1/2 pounds, but mine topped 7 3/4 pounds.


Epoxy Paint Pros and Cons

Epoxy finishes can often be completed with only two coats of primer and two coats of color. Subsequent coats do not soften or alter previous coats. There is little shrinkage to cause the sheeting to buckle or distort and pull paint up from tail fillets.

Masking will only pull up paint if it is too thin and applied to an unclean surface. It will not fade, crack, or age, and is fuel and cleaner resistant. It is cured to sand and handle in 24 hours, and reaches “sword hardness” in four days. Epoxy is the perfect paint for buffing because it does not need to gas out.

Disadvantages to epoxy are that it is more prone to need buffing, is more expensive than some other finishes, and is messier than many products. It must be poured from container to container, and then into the paint gun to ensure complete mixing.

The overspray does not dry in the air as dope does, so it bonds wet to anything it lands on. Because of its viscosity, it picks up more dust in both the spraying and curing process than most other paints do.

There is a waiting or induction period after mixing that allows the chemical process to get up to speed. If you don’t mix enough, you are stuck and cannot complete an area. You might tend to overmix and waste epoxy. If you have excess, store it in a refrigerator for a few days and use it for the next coat.

Epoxy paint is heavier than many finishes, but applying it with a good technique helps. It tends to develop an orange peel texture, but that can be minimized with proper thinning, clean air, and clean surfaces. If you intend to sand and buff, a mild orange peel appearance becomes a nonissue.


Color and Geometry

You can apply a perfect finish and still end up with an unattractive model if you don’t plan your colors and geometry well. This does not apply to scale models.

When I first got into the hobby, I read an article in American Modeler that included some basic principles to use when planning a finish. The first is to use at least two main colors, a dark and a light, for contrast. This is important for more than appearance; it gives good in-flight visibility.

The dark color should be approximately 1/3 to 1/4 of your surface area minus trim, and the light color should be the remaining 3/4 to 2/3 of the surface area. A 1/8- to 1/4-inch wide line of either white or black to separate the two main colors, depending on the overall scheme used, can add life to your finish.

These color-separation lines can enhance the airplane’s geometry. A nearly horizontal line from the spinner to the rudder makes a great accent. A line from wingtip to wingtip, near the high point of the airfoil or on the spar, also is visually pleasing. These lines can be curved or diverted at the root or wingtip for enhancement.

Sometimes the two main colors touch and the trim line can run parallel to, but away from, their border. This was the crux of the American Modeler article and it has served me well with many variations and modifications.

The Mach 1’s finish geometry traces its lineage back to that article. I consider this the only truly unique paint scheme that I ever devised. It was first developed for a Veco Chief in 1964. The dark color was Stinson green, and the lighter color was that same green lightened roughly 1:1 with white, creating a two-tone final finish.

On this model, the separation color was black—not very original. I chose to put a yellow stripe slanted roughly 40° across the wing chord, near the wingtip. Then it seemed that two stripes of contrasting color would be even better. How about gray or a neutral? I then got a real inspiration. How about flipping the two-tone beyond the chordwise stripes? Wow, that looks good!

I’ve used this two-tone scheme on eight or nine airplanes in red, blue, green, maroon, and purple. The beauty of the yellow and gray stripes is that they work with many other colors.

There have been airplanes that used this geometry, but not as two-tones, such as red and yellow and red and lavender. I have painted airplanes with only one main color that still incorporate the wing chord and separator stripes. Sometimes the wing chord stripes became a checkered stripe or merely a silver stripe with a black and red border. I’ve almost worn this geometry out, but the variations keep working.

Please refer to the picture of my recently rebuilt Dirty Birdy for a simple, but attractive, three-color metallic finish. This started out with black as the dominant color, red as the secondary, and silver as the trim.




The Dirty Birdy was awarded first place in Vintage RC at the Toledo Show. The model was refinished after a crash.


The red is a simple wedge pointing into the fuselage on both the wing and the stabilizer. The point is located forward of the midpoint of the wing chord and the forward edge of the red does not sweep as much as the rear edge sweeps. This results in a balanced, pleasing effect on the swept wing. I planned to use a simple 1/4-inch silver trim stripe, but decided to broaden the silver to twice its width as it swept to the wingtips. This simple change brought the wing and tail to life.

The Dirty Birdy has a low fuselage profile. I decided to make the dominant color there red instead of black for visibility, and to make the secondary color at the nose silver.

Black became the trim color on the fuselage. This layout engages the eye and brings the model to life. Black, red, and silver are simple, similar-tone metallic colors, but they look good in the air. The red pops in vertical maneuvers and the silver nose stands out in level flight.

Note that on both the Mach 1 and the Dirty Birdy, the main theme is not extended to the fin. I used to do that, but I decided that it looks too busy.

Choose interesting, vibrant colors. Red, white, and blue are nice, but have been overdone on models. Some great color combinations are lemon yellow with black trim, pink and black, yellow and purple, orange and blue, dark blue and light green or the reverse, and lavender and turquoise.

Keep your eyes open and you will get ideas. I first saw powder blue, burnt orange, and Cub Yellow on a paper at a mall. Those colors stuck with me and appeared on three airplanes before being incorporated into the Mach 1.


Adapt the scheme to your airplane

There are not any hard and fast rules, such as using straight lines on constant chord wings and curved lines on elliptical wings. This is useful advice, but exceptions occur. This is art—it will be right when it looks right.

I own a Goldberg Skylark Twin and an upright engine Veco Thunderbird. The colors were changed, but the geometry featured on the kit boxes was not. How do you improve on the simple elegance of these two examples? Take things you have seen, or even the kit box art, and change it to suit your needs. There is no such thing as a totally new aircraft. They all build on past designs. The same is true of paint designs.




The author’s Veco Thunderbird got its inspiration from the kit’s box art, but the colors were changed.


It was a challenge to adapt the geometry you see to the Mach 1. I’ve mostly used this layout on nearly constant-chord wings. The leading and trailing edge angles and the aspect ratio of the Mach 1 wing to the stabilizer were different. The spinner sits low on the fuselage and the stabilizer sits high. The mean reference line of the fuselage differs greatly from the lines used to construct the airplane and set the incidences.

How do you make all of these conflicting lines come out and look well together? I found I had to move the longitudinal white line fairly far aft on the stabilizer, and the yellow and gray stripes had to be widened, with the slant reduced to approximately 28°. This was the only geometry that would look right on the stabilizer and transfer to the wing. The white line also had to be moved back on the wing and the yellow and gray stripes moved in farther from the tips. Now the wing and stabilizer were in resonance.

The fuselage’s longitudinal white stripe had to be placed high on the spinner and still needed to slope upward to a point below the stabilizer. In all of these calculations, I tried to find balance in the proportions of the colors, as well as in the presentation of lines on the shape of the airplane.

As it was, the line on the fuselage barely cleared the large wing fillets. Sometimes I lay paint schemes out on the plans. Other times, I use a simple drawing. This project was entirely laid out in tape on the assembled, primed airplane. A lot of tape was moved around before getting it right. It was that complex. It’s up to you how it’s done, depending on your project.

The same planning can be necessary with colors. How much of which shade and tone you use next to other shades and tones has a huge effect on the final appearance. Even test samples are sometimes not enough. There have been a few airplanes that I did not like when all of the masking came off.

Occasionally that can be changed with some simple, well-chosen trim, which changes the dynamic interplay of the colors. Red, white, and blue are safe, right? Don’t be afraid to mix colors. This vastly increases you creative options.

The burnt orange on the Mach 1 is orange with a few drops of blue. A few more drops would have given a true brown color. The most versatile mixing color is white because it is used to lighten all other colors. The auto industry is always creating new shades and colors to keep our interest. It works with model judges, too.


Primer

This is the simplest part of the article. Klass Kote primer is forgiving and easy to use. Mix it per the instructions on the can. It will flow on well without problems and cover most imperfections, except pinholes and deep grain that the epoxy doesn’t fill. Do not sand. An hour or two after spraying the first coat, pinholes can be filled in with a fine-tip brush. Let it dry a day and then sand it all at once, taking most of the primer off. You are only creating a smooth surface for the second coat. A little 220-grit sandpaper, followed by a more serious session with 320-grit sandpaper, should work.

The second coat should be treated like a color. You will want a thin, consistent coat that will provide a base for colors. Do not leave serious “sand-through” area at this juncture—it will show through the color. You might want to touch it up a little, but you should not have to apply a third coat. This aircraft has to fly!


Color Application

Standard procedure dictates that light colors, such as the white separation line, be applied first; however, in the case of the Mach 1, the chord-wise stripes cross and cut off the white line. The masking sequence works out much better by painting the chord stripes first.

Place light pencil marks on the primed airframe for location of the yellow stripes. Fully “wet-coat” a layer of yellow paint approximately an inch beyond the marks. Don’t overdo it. Going too far beyond the marks equates to extra weight.

When I sprayed these, the paint was a little too thick and I ended up with a mild orange peel texture. At this point, I sanded it to prepare for the second coat with 320-grit sandpaper, which I would have done even if there was no orange peel effect. I determined that if I dipped a 1/8-inch dowel into the paint cup and the paint mixture dripped with the consistency of water, the orange peel texture was very minimal.

Because I was going to sand and buff, it didn’t matter. If you are going to sand and buff, the second (final) coat of yellow should be sanded with 1,000- or 1,500-grit sandpaper before masking for the next color. This does a much better job at the color borders when final buffing. The finer-grit sanding can be done after the spraying is completed.

Tape off the final boundaries of the yellow stripes. I use Scotch 3M automotive 1/4-inch Fine Line Tape #06301. It does not need to be clear to seal the edge if it is properly applied—firmly with no dirt or oil on the surface. It will produce a very clean, sharp line. Cover the inside area with a wider automotive masking tape of good quality.

This is important because the tape over these colors will remain on until all of the others are done. Do not use tape made for latex house paint. The solvent in stronger paints will bleed through and you will not like the result.

Next, mark off the gray stripe with pencil and again spray past the border. It’s good to protect the border of the yellow from being oversprayed with gray. Overspray will complicate the border when you get to the appropriate colors. In all respects, the gray stripe is done in exactly the same manner as the yellow. When you are finished applying the second coat, mask this off. It too will remain until all the painting is done.

My original plan was to use metallic silver rather than gray, but metallic cannot be buffed out. (It would have been stunning!)

Next, lay out and spray the long, narrow, white stripes. Again, use two coats and sand to at least a 1,000-grit finish if you’re planning to buff the finish. Here’s the catch! Do not spray the white up against the tape that establishes the edge of the yellow and gray stripes. I did and it led to a lot of extra work.

Epoxy paint is very dense and does not “gas out” like other paints such as dope. It lies up against the masking and leaves a high, sharp ridge I call a levee. If you are only applying one color over your bottom color, you remove the tape and sand off the levee at your buffing stage.

The geometry of the Mach 1 scheme brings blue and burnt orange up to a corner created by the white line that butts up to the yellow or gray. If there is a white levee against the tape and you put another color over the white, when you sand the top levee off, you will leave an unattractive white reveal from the underlying white levee. I ended up having to sand down into that white reveal with the tape that protected the yellow or gray removed and masking it again. I then sprayed the blue and orange again. In some spots this was necessary more than once.

One solution to this problem is to lay out a Cessna-type scheme. Paint the airplane all white and then paint the trim colors so that there are no multiple overlaps. In the future, the solution for a situation like the white stripe on the Mach 1 would be to not spray the white right up to the yellow and gray borders. Stay just short enough so that no paint ends up on the tape.

Tape off the white to prepare for the blue and orange. When the blue and orange are completed and the tape that is covering the white is removed, the blue and orange can be taped off for a short distance and the short section of missing white is airbrushed in. This eliminates overlapping levees because the white stripe is now butting the other colors rather than having overlaps.

After the white is sprayed, sanded to 1,000-grit finish, and taped off, either blue or orange can be applied. If spraying blue, protect the future orange area from overspray, and vice versa. On large areas I use waxed paper or plastic grocery bags to avoid using masking tape. This is important not just because of weight, but also because of the same levee and reveal issues that I discussed. Reverse the procedure for the other major color by removing the tape from the area and covering the just-completed major color after a 24-hour cure.

After the final color and curing is complete, you can remove all of the masking unless you have an unfinished white line to complete. If you have avoided the levee problem, you have created a complex, beautiful paint job in a reasonable amount of time.

If you chose a simpler scheme, such as that of the three-color Dirty Birdy, you finished rather quickly. If the level of orange peel and dust is satisfactory, you can be done. Otherwise, I will finish with a discussion about final sanding, buffing, waxing, markings, and decals.


Final Finishing

I have been using the Mach 1 that is pictured in the article for a procedural example, which brings us to the final step. If you have done good work under favorable conditions, with just a little luck, you should have negligible dust and surface blemishes. If you just want to go fly, you might choose to be done at this point.

A few scattered larger specks of dust can, with care, be individually sanded off and polished, saving time and effort. If you want a standout show finish, it would be best to buff out the finish. Before you decide, let me share this: This is the easiest part of the whole process. You have already done the hard part!

In the early days, the finest grit I had access to was wet or dry 600-grit sandpaper. Buffing that out was hard work! For the Mach 1, grits were available up to 5,000. I was told that higher grit is available, but I was unable to obtain any. It is also possible to stop at a given grit and accept that as your final finish with no buffing. The Mach 1 looked very good in the matte shine produced at 5,000.

A word of caution is in order. If you have used Rust-Oleum metallic spray as I did on the Dirty Birdy, do not sand it. The metal flakes form a matrix when they flow to the surface immediately after spraying. Sanding destroys this effect.

There are many clear coats available, such as Klass Kote’s two-part system in either epoxy or urethane, and Minwax’s single-component spray can. Clear-coat the metallics and then sand or buff if needed. A well-applied clear coat is usually better left alone.

If you have followed my protocol so far, you have already taken the colors that are overlapped by later colors—such as the yellow, gray, and white stripes in my example—down to either 1,000 or 2,000 grit. Between coats, when painting the successive layers, sand between them with 320- or 400-grit sandpaper.

On the final coat, which is where you are now, it is inadvisable to go below 600-grit sandpaper. It is too easy to sand through the finish. Use 600-grit sandpaper wet with a balsa or rubber block to clean up all but the most minor surface flaws and variations. The block will show you if there are any high or low points.

Use the reflected light techniques previously discussed to locate and remove subtle flaws. Carefully level out the raised edges at the taped color borders that I referred to as levees. This is the most likely place for a sand-through.

After 600-grit sandpaper has removed all but the finest of flaws, follow with 1,000-grit, 2,000-grit, 3,000-grit, and 5,000-grit sandpaper in that order. All are removing very little paint and serving mostly to remove any scratches from the previous grit.

The reason I left a few mild flaws is because the finer grits will still get them with less risk of a sand-through. Always keep the sandpaper wet. Following my example, I will take the blue and burnt orange to either 1,000 or 2,000 grit, depending upon what was previously done. Take care not to scratch previously sanded areas with a rougher grit.

After everything is at a 2,000-grit smoothness, you can start sanding the entire airframe without regard to crossing over color borders. There is almost no possibility of a sand-through at these levels. This will also clean up your taped borders. This sounds like a lot of work, but it isn’t. It goes fast after the surface flaws have been removed.

If at any point you do have a sand-through, you will have to tape off the nearest borders and feather-in a repair with a Badger airbrush. Brushed repairs do not work very well with epoxy paint. Wait 24 hours and go through your grits again. Try not to use 600 this time because it might remove too much.

If you leave your finish at 5,000 with no buffing, these repairs cannot be seen. If you buff, the repairs may become visible, but only to the discerning eye that is looking for them with reflected light. The Mach 1 had a lot of airbrushed repairs and hardly anyone could see them, even when I pointed them out. The builder always knows—until even he forgets!

For buffing, I used 3M Rubbing Compound #03900, found at Advance Auto Parts. Use a damp, soft cotton cloth such as an old T-shirt. Buff each color separately because the compound can work residue from one color into the pores of a neighboring color. I did this all by hand. It goes fast and is easy if you sand to 5,000.

A power buffer is unnecessary and could cause damage. The buffing leaves a distinctive pattern of ultrafine scratches on its own. These can be hidden with a good, hard wax such as Turtle Wax.

For The Toledo Show: R/C Model Expo, I applied five coats, letting each harden before applying the next. It will wear off when the model is exposed to fuel, but by then, you won’t care.

I confess to still not wanting to risk flying the Mach 1 often. It’s my best finish ever. It has been flown a few times, though, and is a real sweetheart.




The author feels that the Mach 1 has the best finish he has done on a model aircraft. The first-place award for Best Finish went to the Mach 1 at The Toledo Show: R/C Model Expo.


I’ve since discovered Meguiar’s Ultimate Compound, which is so fine it leaves no discernible scratches that need to be waxed. There is also Meguiar’s M205 Mirror Glaze Ultra Finishing Polish, which is even finer.


Markings

I usually put the name of my airplane on the left wing (if it is vintage) per the Vintage Radio Control Society (VRCS) rulebook, and my AMA number on the right wing per AMA requirements.

Vinyl transfers in any size, color, and font can be made at almost any quick sign shop. Most can even copy a script from the plans or kit box. I don’t like an overly busy or gaudy look, but a few well-placed decals and markings can really bring a finish to life. Even the Mach 1 with its six-color scheme would look plain with no other additions to dress it up.

The flags you see mid-fuselage were intended for the fin, but there was a sand-through over a persistent glue joint that needed fixed without respraying. The Eagles that I chose were at first black, but then changed to white, which looked better with the white longitudinal stripe and Mach 1 decals. Don’t be afraid to change something to make it better.




The Mach 1, with its six-color scheme, would look plain with no other additions to dress it up. The flags on the fuselage were intended for the fin, but a sand-through on a persistent glue joint needed to be fixed without respraying.


I found the mirror-image decals online. A choice of colors could be ordered to any size. There is a top and bottom backing for the application, so after they are applied, there is no film to mar the underlying finish. I did not clear coat the decals because I wanted a clean look for Toledo. Fuel may eventually deteriorate them.

The bottom of the wing has a black and white chessboard with black and white chessmen. The board colors are painted, but the chessmen are cut from MonoKote trim material. The paint scheme on the Dirty Birdy has entirely painted stripes, but the previous finish had some stick-on stripes.




On the Mach 1, the bottom of the wing has a black and white chessboard with black and white chessmen. The board colors were painted, but the chessmen were cut from MonoKote trim material.


I usually use automotive products rather than model products. They come with a paper backing and a plastic topcoat that is removed after application. They are much easier to apply in straight lines and come in multiple stripe patterns that keep the lines perfectly parallel.

Another plus is that they are made from thinner material, which doesn’t appear as though it is standing above the surface. The checkerboard on the Dirty Birdy features a spray-on silver metallic field and MonoKote stick-on squares. Done right, this can be more professional looking than sprayed squares.

If you have followed this article through by painting your own airplane, chances are good that you will have a creation that will make you proud and happy for a long time. You can’t buy that satisfaction.

You might even win an award, whether it is for the airplane of the month at your club or an award at an event such as The Toledo Show: R/C Model Expo. The only question is whether you want to risk flying it very much …

Best of luck!


—Dan Grotzinger
spitfirefighter@hotmail.com


Sources

The Toledo Show: R/C Model Expo
www.toledoshow.com

VRCS
www.vintagercsociety.org

Klass Kote
(612) 243-1234
www.klasskote.com

3M
www.3m.com/3M/en_US/consumer-us

Rust-Oleum
www.rustoleum.com

Minwax
(800) 523-9299
www.minwax.com

Turtle Wax
www.turtlewax.com

Meguiar’s
(800) 347-5700
www.meguiars.com

Advance Auto Parts
(877) 238-2623
http://shop.advanceautoparts.com/home

MonoKote
www.monokote.com



RC Scale - October 2016

$
0
0


Written by Stan Alexander
Selecting your first plan-built model
Contributed column
As seen in the October 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


It’s that time of the year when many of us start looking for our next airplane project. Whether it is an ARF, kit, or plan-built model depends on the amount of time, tools, and skills you have to invest in an aircraft.

The quickest project is an ARF. I’ve assembled my share. Kits give you a sense of accomplishment that ARFs just don’t, plus you can choose your own color scheme and markings.

Either of these choices limits you to what I call the standard group of models: warbirds such as P-51s, P-40s, and the ever-popular P-47s, and civil aircraft such as J-3 Cubs, various Cessna aircraft, and, if you’re lucky, a few others.

When you start looking at plan-built models, your choices increase in both size and subjects. Know this—not all plans are created equal. Some are excellent, others are good, and like some three-view drawings, a few are downright poorly done.

I recently built a J-3 Cub for my grandson. I selected a 76-inch Goldberg J-3 Cub kit with an O.S. .48FS engine. A model of this size can be flown at local airfields—not just at national or regional events. It’s intended to be a fun airplane and a tool to teach skills such as using the rudder in turns, etc.

The biggest scale error in the outline of the kit is the ailerons, which are strip ailerons. Because of past experience, I added solid balsa sheet to the bottom of the wingtips for small landing errors.
It built into a nice model and we finished it with MonoKote Cub Yellow. The markings that came with the kit were tossed out because, at approximately 1/5.5 scale, there were no markings that really fit. I contacted Callie Graphics for new markings, which made the model stand out. The markings were $28 postpaid.

I used the stock cowl and other items that came with the kit. The only modification that I made was to add two servos to the ailerons instead of one. Beyond that, the cowl is pretty much stock.


Guy Forshey’s P-51D Mustang

Guy Forshey has been busy with his latest labor of love, a Dave Platt P-51D Mustang kit. He bought the kit from a local aircraft mechanic for $100, including the Platt retracts.




Guy Forshey built this Dave Platt P-51D Mustang from a 1980s kit.


The newspaper that was wrapped around the canopy was dated 1982 and the plans crumbled like the Dead Sea Scrolls when he tried to unfurl them. Guy ordered new plans sheets.

Guy said, “I like to detail to the max, so I spent all of last winter scratch-building the cockpit features. I also applied thousands of flush rivets in the primer surface using a 1/16-inch brass tube as a cutting tool. Kudos to [my] machinist friend, Keith Hall, for fabricating the offset forks for the landing gear struts.”




Some of the cockpit detail that Guy added to his Mustang.




Guy also detailed and weathered the model in other areas, including the retract gear and surfaces.


Guy covered the model with 1/2-ounce fiberglass cloth and resin, and primed and painted it with Klass Kote epoxy paints. He selected a DLE-55RA engine for power and a scale Biela four-blade propeller. A Futaba 2.4 GHz radio system was installed as well. Great job, Guy!


Cessna Airmaster Lighting System

Meanwhile, I have had other projects going on in the shop, including my Cessna Airmaster.

The G-26 engine fits snugly inside of the Airmaster’s cowling with the firewall and mounts for it. If I built another Cessna Airmaster, I might make the main landing gear one piece instead of two pieces. I also like three-piece wing construction with a wing tube.

The lighting system is pretty cool and I met the owner/operator of Dave’s R/C Electronics at The Toledo Show: R/C Model Expo, in April 2016. I placed my order there and when I returned home, I sent him all of the specifics for the 6-volt system.

The Cessna has seven lights—two navigation lights, two strobes on the top and bottom of the fuselage, and two landing lights mounted in the bottom of the wing. It also has a clear marker light on the rudder. All of this is included in the lighting kit. I merely have to place them in the model and build the brackets for the landing lights. The lights will come on when the model is turned on, and servos will activate the landing lights.




A Dave’s R/C Electronics custom lighting system for the author’s Cessna Airmaster includes everything except the lens and servos for the landing lights.


The main reason why I selected this Airmaster is because of its black, international orange, and white pinstripe scheme. I have seen an Airmaster in solid white, one in red, and a yellow one, but I had never seen this scheme until I searched the internet.

Finding the owner of a full-scale Cessna Airmaster and being able to communicate with him has also been a big help. I plan to visit the owner and take some detail shots and close-ups for the interior. I’m looking forward to going back to Oshkosh, Wisconsin, to attend EAA AirVenture and going to Green Bay, Wisconsin. Go Packers!


National Naval Aviation Museum

Pensacola, Florida, has been the cradle of naval aviation since the early 1900s. This is the home of the famed Blue Angels air show team, as well as the air training center for all branches of the service.




This F-14 Tomcat guards the front gate as you arrive at the museum.


You can feel the history before you arrive on base as you drive west on I-10 and see the bridges that are adorned with Blue Angel aircraft pointed upward. When you arrive on Blue Angels Boulevard on your way to the base, the U.S. Navy’s presence is all around. To say Pensacola has a long history with the U.S. Navy would be nothing short of an understatement—and the city is proud of it!

The National Naval Aviation Museum has many facets. You can’t see it all in a day—or two days for that matter. There is the research center, the restoration facility, the aircraft outside on ramps, the movies inside, and models of aircraft, ships, and virtually every aircraft carrier that the Navy has in its vast inventory.




Some of the cockpit mockups that allow people to experience sitting in a jet fighter.


I’ll concentrate on a brief visit to the museum because there are many aircraft there that you will see nowhere else in the world.

If you are a Scale modeler and are interested in naval aircraft, there couldn’t be a better place to obtain documentation for your next project. As with many museums, if you know which aircraft you would like to take photos of, the staff will try to help you in any way possible.

Remember to ask ahead of time and send an email or letter to the superintendent to set up a time for you. I shot the Vought Vindicator on one visit and the staff unfolded the wings, opened all of the side panels, and actually let me sit in the cockpit. Wow! This is the only one that still exists in the world. That was truly a treat.

The museum is well-lit for photos and it is very clean. If you’ve been to aviation museums, you know this isn’t the norm. You won’t find a layer of dust covering the aircraft, which changes the colors on the airframes. Be respectful of the history of the aircraft—look, but don’t touch, unless you are told otherwise. You can go right up to the aircraft—no ropes or fences to hold you back 20 feet.




One of several F6F Hellcats on display.




An F-4 Phantom is located in the newest addition to the museum.


I usually start with an eight-point walk-around of an aircraft that I’m interested in. Then I start at the nose and shoot detailed photos until I’m satisfied. Always take more than what you need and check out the history on the airframes. One example is a Douglas SBD Dauntless that took part in the Battle of Midway in 1942. It’s the only survivor, and was recovered from Lake Michigan several years ago.

My wife doesn’t mind going to the museum, either. She usually takes in some of the many videos around the museum’s perimeter or reads books and visits the gift shop. But the treat for us both on any visit is the Cubi Bar and Café. You don’t have to leave the building or the base for a good meal at lunchtime. This is a sit-down café and on the café walls is more history from different units of the Navy and Marines.




An overview of the main hangar.


This is merely an overview about the first half of the day. I could write volumes about this museum, but you really need to see it for yourself—at least a few times!

Fair skies and tailwinds.

Bonus photos

Model Aviation Magazine - October 2016 RC Scale Bonus Photos


Sources

Hobbico
(800) 637-7660
www.hobbico.com

Dave’s R/C Electronics
(423) 544-1657
www.davesrce.com

National Naval Aviation Museum
(800) 327-5002
www.navalaviationmuseum.org

Callie Graphics
info@callie-graphics.com
callie-graphics.com

National Association of Scale Aeromodelers (NASA)
www.nasascale.org



AMA News: Flying Site Assistance - First Weedwacker’s paving and grand reopening

$
0
0


Written by Tony Stillman
Flying Site Coordinator
Monthly AMA News Column
First Weedwacker's paving and grand reopening
As seen in the October 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Bonus video

Weedwackers 2016 Membership Drive from AirvidsSC on Vimeo.



Keith Miller, club president of the First Weedwacker Aerosquadron, submitted the following report.



The First Weedwacker Aerosquadron operates at the Ron Smith Memorial Flying Field in Lakeside, California. With 145 members, we’re afforded the luxury of operating atop a retired landfill, in cooperation with the San Diego County Department of Parks and Recreation. The cost and effort of maintaining the field lie solely with the club, as I’m sure is the case with most clubs.

Our runway was originally a paved pad used in the 1960s for truck access to an asphalt mixing plant. Since the club gained use of the site in 1977, we’ve maintained the runway with various layers of asphalt, slurry, and seal coats. Throughout the last five or six years, it became apparent that we were losing the battle to deep cracks that slurry coats simply can’t fill.

Rather than pouring cash into maintenance costs, we pocketed what would have been spent with the intent of saving for a complete repaving job. During those five years, the existing surface degraded significantly. Quotes in excess of $3,000 deterred us, as our club treasury was only half of that.

Finally, early this year, a sinkhole opened at one end of the runway that could swallow a small car. The county agreed to excavate and fill the hole for us. However, despite all of our efforts and pleading, the county declined to help us with fresh paving. We couldn’t even get an asphalt patch over the sinkhole. It was left as packed decomposed granite. Although that left us an operable runway, it was clear that now was the time to push hard for a fresh layer of asphalt.

Led by Butch Weiser, a few of our dedicated members started a campaign to find local pavers and gather quotes. The projected cost was daunting! Then we discovered that one of our members had a nephew in the business. He offered a generously reduced rate. Butch laid out a paving map that covered about 50% of the existing runway, which put the total cost within reach.

In May 2016, the club approved Butch’s motion and plan to fund the project through a combination of three-year dues bundles and straight donations. Our treasurer created a five-year spreadsheet projecting how much we had to bring in up front that would ensure a stable treasury over the next five years.





Within a week of approval, member contributions far exceeded our minimum trigger point, raising more than $10,000! Three weeks later we had a new runway covering more than 80% of the existing pavement. Shortly after that, a team of members gathered for a striping party to paint the new lines and circles. In August we held our grand reopening!





The lesson I learned from Butch is that the club exists for us to enjoy flying our models. And to do that, we need a runway. We can put aside our high-end raffle prizes and annual award banquets. Those niceties will come when funds permit. But we fly airplanes, helicopters, and multirotors. And those need a runway (at least the airplanes do). And the First Weedwacker club now has the finest model airport in Southern California, thanks to the hard work and generosity of our members.





Being past the 2016 AMA Flying Site Grant program deadline, we’ll submit for the 2017 program. If we’re fortunate enough to be a grant recipient, we’ll have a foot forward toward our first maintenance seal coat due in a couple of years.

Another club member, Lance Edmunson, from AirvidsSC, produced a fantastic video that presents our membership and the renewed field. The video can be viewed at https://vimeo.com/173393574. We invite fellow modelers and guests in the area to visit us at the field or on our website at www.weedwackers.org.



Viewing all 1309 articles
Browse latest View live