Quantcast
Channel: Model Aviation Online Features
Viewing all 1312 articles
Browse latest View live

Tower Kaos 60 GP/EP ARF

$
0
0



Written by Tom Sullivan
A classic aircraft revisited.
Abridged review
Read the full review in the January 2015 issue of
Model Aviation.


Mention the name Kaos to any old-school modeler, and it will be immediately recognized as one of the cornerstones of early sport or Pattern designs. The Kaos family was designed by Joe Bridi and was first featured in the February 1970 issue of R/C Modeler. Many variations of the original Kaos came afterward, and I’m very excited to review the Tower Hobbies Kaos, which the company refers to as the Kaos 60 GP/EP ARF.

One constant throughout the Kaos series was the airfoil and basic wing design. These are credited with making the Kaos a gentle, easy flier at low speeds and an all-out aerobat when pushed. True to the original Kaos, this new ARF is sized for a .60-size glow engine, but has roughly 15% more wing area.

When taking the parts out of the box, I like to take some time to examine what makes up a review model. In the case of the Kaos, I found that the entire airframe is made from balsa and plywood. This construction is very light and rigid.

If you choose glow power, you can use the 420cc plastic fuel tank, which is preplumbed for a three-line system. If you want to try electric power, lightweight, laser-cut plywood parts are included to construct the motor mounting box. Regardless of the powerplant you use, you can streamline the looks with the included fiberglass cowl.


With the exception of the wooden electric motor box parts, everything you see here bolts together. If you build the Kaos as glow-powered airplane, you won’t need a drop of glue.


Flying

Because of the timing of this review, I didn’t have the luxury of waiting for a nice, sunny day for the maiden flight with the electric power system. It was windy—15 mph with a lot of gusts—but it was off to the field to see what would happen.

Bringing the Kaos in for the required photo passes, you can use whatever age-old catch phrases you’d like: it flew as if on rails, it grooves like a Pattern aircraft, or it flies like a dream. They’re all true. Even in the gusty winds, there was no problem placing the Kaos exactly where I wanted.

After the photos were complete, I took it up a bit to see if it flew the way I remember my original Kaos flying, and it does. The RimFire and 6S LiPo provide more than enough power to take the Kaos vertical and keep going until you decide to bring it back down to earth.

Comparing the glow experience is interesting. Although they don’t fly with the same propeller, both powerplants used the same size APC propeller—the 13 x 8E with the RimFire and 13 x 8 on the O.S. 65AX.

After I had had done some bench running on the O.S. 65AX to set the needles and get a decent idle, it was up in the air again. The flight characteristics are the same, with the exception of the vertical performance. The RimFire setup will easily outpull the 65AX, because the glow version will give plenty of vertical, but not unlimited vertical. Besides that, the two power systems don’t “feel” that much different.

Of course, there are the obvious differences, such as bringing the extra support equipment for the glow version (starters, fuel, pumps, etc.) and the cleanup afterward. Then there are the things that you really do miss such as the smell of burning glow fuel, which always brings back memories, and that thin trail of exhaust when the engine’s running slightly rich.


Conclusion

Regardless of what’s powering the Kaos, this model is exactly what it should be—a Kaos. It’s a great-flying machine that will fly hands off when properly trimmed. It’s just as at home flying Pattern maneuvers, everyday sport flying, or just cruising around the field. Tower Hobbies has done a great job of not only bringing back this legend, but also updating it in a few key areas.
—Tom Sullivan
tmsullivan@roadrunner.com


Video


Manufacturer/Distributor:

Tower Hobbies
(800) 637-6050
www.towerhobbies.com


Sources:

Tactic
(800) 637-7660
www.tacticrc.com

Castle Creations
(913) 390-6939
www.castlecreations.com

Kaos manual and addendum
www.towerhobbies.com/manuals/tow/towa2058_manual.pdf

www.towerhobbies.com/manuals/tow/towa2058_manual_add.pdf








E-flite P-47D Thunderbolt BNF Basic

$
0
0



Written by Greg Gimlick
Horizon Hobby's popular foam fighter includes flaps and retracts
Product review with video.
As seen in the January 2015 issue of
Model Aviation.


Video Review

Check back soon and watch a video review of the E-flite P-47D Thunderbolt BNF Basic.


Specifications

Model type: Semiscale foam warbird
Skill level: Intermediate
Wingspan: 42.2 inches
Wing area: 326 square inches
Airfoil: Semisymmetrical
Length: 39.5 inches
Ready-to-fly weight: 44.7 ounces advertised; 44.5 actual
Power system: 15-size 950 Kv BL outrunner; E-flite 30-amp Pro brushless ESC; E-flite four-blade 9.8 x 6 propeller (all included)
Radio: Spektrum six-channel AR636A DSMX receiver with servos (installed)
Construction: Z-foam
Needed to complete: Six-channel Spektrum transmitter; E-flite 3S 11.1-volt 2,200 mAh 30C LiPo battery pack
Price: $249.99 BNF Basic
Flight duration: Approximately 6 minutes


Pluses

• Easy-access top hatch.
• Sturdy Z-foam construction.
• Electric retracts installed.
• Flaps installed.
• Ready to fly in less than an hour.
• No glue required to assemble.
• AS3X rock-solid stability.
• Four-blade propeller and scale spinner hub.
• Factory-applied graphics
• Dummy engine, gear doors, machine gun, and panel lines.


Minus

• Some control horn screws protrude through top of surfaces.


Product Review

It’s a P-47D “bubble top,” so I knew I’d be in love when I opened it, and I was right! The E-flite P-47D Thunderbolt BNF Basic arrived in a big foam box that protected it from the abuse that the shipping company put it through. A hole was punched through the side of the shipping carton, but nothing inside was damaged.

This is a foam airplane, so I expected to see some beads in the finish, but it’s not distracting, and it certainly looks good in the air. I wish it was a smoother surface, but that’s a matter of personal taste and has no adverse effect on how it flies—which is great!



The parts count is extremely low because everything is installed.


Construction

The P-47 BNF Basic doesn’t require much assembly time; in fact, it takes less than an hour. As always, you should begin by thoroughly reading the instruction manual and studying each photograph. Before beginning assembly, go online and check for any updates. When I assembled mine, there weren’t any. I put the battery on my charger so it would be ready when I finished the assembly.

Begin by aligning the tail surfaces and sliding them into place. There is no glue required. They slide onto a carbon-fiber wing joiner, and each half has a plastic piece that will mate with the other side. When everything is in place, secure the stabilizer halves with the provided clear tape. Connect the elevator control rod and that’s pretty much it.

The main wing can be left attached to the fuselage and the airplane transported in one piece, or you can easily remove the three bolts and carry the parts separately. Because it’s small enough to fit fully assembled into my Smart Car, I carry it that way.

A number of wires from the wing servos must be fed through a small hole in the bottom of the fuselage before securing the bolts. These mate with preinstalled Y cords and extensions for the ailerons, gear, and flaps. This is easy enough, but I prefer not to have to do it every time I want to fly, so for me, it’s a one-piece airplane.

Most of the assembly time will be spent binding your radio to the receiver and setting the controls. Remember, it’s extremely important that you do not use subtrims to correct any control surface alignment! Make all adjustments at the control horn clevises. This is a requirement of the AS3X system.

Do not set up exponential on your transmitter; that is taken care of in the AS3X system. After the first few flights, you can adjust your transmitter to add some exponential or you can do so with AS3X system programming. After you’ve set up your radio and everything looks good, remember to rebind your transmitter a final time.

There is a pair of clear belly pans you can affix to the bottom of the fuselage if you’re going to do belly landings instead of deploying the gear. I suggest that you use the included two-blade propeller if you decide to make belly landings regularly.



The stabilizer halves slide into the fuselage brackets and lock together.



It’s slightly crowded, but there is plenty of room to secure all of the wiring.



The P-47 now comes with preinstalled retracts and flaps. This release also has a new paint scheme.


Control Throws and CG

I used the recommended throws and center of gravity (CG), which worked well. After successful test flights, I set up a three-position switch for each dual rate and slightly increased the throw on my ailerons. The recommended throws work well and I would keep them at that until you’ve flown the P-47D Thunderbolt several times.

I set my CG at the recommended setting of 60mm. I don’t recommend moving it back until you’re comfortable with it. I like the way it handles at the 60mm point and will leave it there.


Flying

The moment of truth finally arrived and the P-47 rolled down my grass field with authority. I was able to keep the tail planted with full elevator until I was ready to take off, but be careful if your grass is long. The wheels are only 25/8 inches and don’t like tall grass.

Easing off the elevator had the tail up and ready to leap into the air. The retracts came up nicely and I knew that I was going to enjoy watching this airplane fly almost as much as I was going to like flying it.

I wish I could tell you how challenging the test flight was, but there just weren’t any surprises or problems, and that was a very good thing! It was relatively gusty, but the little Thunderbolt handled it perfectly thanks to the AS3X system. With AS3X stabilization, it doesn’t feel as though you’re fighting the system. It dampens out some of the bumps from the wind and makes the flight look much smoother.

Within seconds of leaving the ground, I determined that the CG was right, and seeing that there was plenty of power, I went into aerobatics. This model flew much bigger than its diminutive size would suggest. I attribute that to the AS3X system. Loops, rolls, inverted, stall turns, and Split S maneuvers are all within the normal flight capabilities with the given power setup and settings.

I was curious about the four-blade propeller, but it carried the airplane beautifully through all of the maneuvers and it adds to the aesthetics. Horizon Hobby did a great job of matching this propeller to the motor/battery combo.

Stalls were a pleasant surprise. The wings are nicely proportioned and they don’t abruptly stall. The P-47D dropped its nose without any indication that it might snap. Recovery was easy and I knew landings wouldn’t be scary—especially knowing it would slow down well with flaps.

I flew out my timer set for 5 minutes and had plenty of power if a go-around might be needed. On landing, the only challenge is keeping the airplane from tipping up on its nose in the grass during rollout. It’s not a problem if the grass is short.



The author poses with the P-47. Other than occasionally ending up on its nose, the P-47 has no trouble flying from a grass field.


Conclusion

I love flying this airplane; it’s as simple as that! My buddy, Wayne Parrish, flew it for my photo runs and he said, “It just doesn’t have any bad habits.” I agree completely!

The suggested settings are more than adequate, although I’ve increased my mid-flap setting and added a slight amount of additional aileron throw. Anyone comfortable with a low-wing sport airplane would easily be able to fly this. It looks great in the air and feels bigger than it is.

Having a small-scale airplane arrive with BNF capability and AS3X-integrated stabilization for this price is a find. I’ve extended my timer to 6 minutes and the cells on the 3S LiPo battery pack usually measure about 3.8 volts at landing.

I have one last tip. If you do add any trim during the flight, be sure to center the sticks and allow the AS3X system to learn the new settings before making any control movements. That means allowing it to go without your input for roughly 3 seconds.
—Greg Gimlick
maelectrics@gimlick.com


Manufacturer/Distributor:

Horizon Hobby
(800) 338-4639
www.horizonhobby.com


Sources:

Spektrum
(800) 338-4639
www.spektrumrc.com







Horizon Hobby AeroTow 2015

$
0
0


Written by Andrew Griffith
Illinois might be the best place to get a tow
Coverage of the 2015 Horizon Hobby AeroTow event
Photos by the author
As published in the February 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.



Ask the average modeler, “If you could go to one of the big events that you’ve never been to but have read about in the modeling media, what event would it be?” Joe Nall Week? Top Gun? The AMA Nats? Scale Masters? Maybe the International Radio Controlled Helicopter Association (IRCHA) Jamboree?

Some combination of these would probably top most people’s lists. Ask someone who owns a Scale glider though, and the answer will almost always be the Horizon Hobby AeroTow (formerly the JR AeroTow).

It has been at the top of my event bucket list for a few years and things came together this year to allow me to attend. The dates were two weeks later this year so it wasn’t as close to Joe Nall Week, and Model Aviation’s Editor-in-Chief Jay Smith decided the time was ripe to feature this premier event.

Horizon Hobby, with Peter Goldsmith onboard, has really done its part to promote the aerotowing segment of our hobby. With ParkZone offering products such as the UMX Carbon Cub, ASK-21, the foam K-8 glider, and Carbon-Z Cub, all the way up to the Hangar 9 33% Pawnee and the new ASW 20 Giant Scale glider, Horizon Hobby has gliders and towplanes to fit nearly any budget or size range.

Marking its 13th year, the 2015 Horizon Hobby AeroTow took place June 18-21. The locale is the quaint town of Monticello, Illinois, a 20-minute drive from Champaign, Illinois, which is the location of Horizon Hobby’s corporate headquarters.

Located 21/2 hours south of Chicago by car, Monticello might well be the dictionary entry for “Small Town USA.” Small shops, large houses, and long, straight roads lined with acres of corn set the stage for RC and full-scale thermal gliding. The event takes place on the outskirts of town at the Piatt County Airport, which is the home base of the full-scale Illini Glider Club.

Large farm fields are crisscrossed with paved roads and barns that, when heated, combine to set off thermals. This was evident with several extremely long flights, including one by my E-flite Blanik, which was on its way to an hour when I got tired of standing in the sun and traded 1,200 feet of altitude for 2 minutes of high-energy aerobatics to get back down to land.



The full-scale Illini Glider Club graciously makes its hangar and runway available to the Horizon Hobby AeroTow each year.



John Diniz flew this prototype electric glider before the towing got started. The long focal-length lens gives the illusion that it was right over the hangar from which we were operating.



Attendance this year was just short of 50 pilots, but many brought several airplanes and there appeared to be more than 100 gliders on site. Had it not been for a less-than-favorable weather forecast, the attendance would likely have been even higher. This was discussed with Horizon team pilot and founder of the ScaleSoaring.com forum, Len Buffinton, who said that skipping events because of weather forecasts means that it’s likely you won’t bother going to any events and will miss a great time.

Despite the forecast, several good days of flying were enjoyed by those of us who chose to buck the odds and make the trip. A unique service that Horizon Hobby provides is sailplane transportation for pilots on the West Coast. You can take your airplane to the Horizon warehouse and the company will ship your glider on its warehouse truck and you can fly to the AeroTow and not have to worry about transporting a large model. When the event is over, Horizon ships it back and you pick it up at the company’s warehouse.

After a long drive the day before, I headed out to the airfield first thing in the morning on Thursday to be greeted by clouds and a low ceiling. Undeterred, several fliers spent an hour or so demonstrating how Discus Launch Gliders are really flown. A couple of these pilots were throwing the airplanes higher than I often get on a hi-start launch!

The weather cleared and as soon as the sound of the first gas-fired Hangar 9 Pawnee filled the air, a line quickly formed in the staging area and a long day was enjoyed until it was too dark to fly. After returning to the hotel, it was off to Champaign where a large group of attendees gathered for dinner and spent another couple of hours getting to know each other better and talking about Scale Soaring.



ScaleSoaring.com forum founder Len Buffinton made the trip from New England. Len always seems to have a smile on his face whether he is flying a glider, towplane, or just hanging around and socializing.



Kevin Kavaney, from Minneapolis, preps his huge KA-6CR in the staging line. Pilots needed to be ready to hook up and fly when the towplane landed to keep the line moving.



Some of the best parts of a trip are often those you don’t plan for. On Friday, the weather guessers were right and it rained most of the morning. Making the best of the situation, employees Missie Anderson and Kim Payne entertained a large group of pilots with a tour of the Horizon Hobby facilities in Champaign.

I had visions of sharing pictures with our readers of the service department or the warehouse that seemed to go on forever and was stocked several stories tall. It covers several acres with hobby goodies of every shape and size. My vison was dashed when my camera was confiscated at the front desk to preserve the integrity of yet-to-be-released products.

What the camera probably wouldn’t have captured was the friendly attitude of everyone I met. The entire group was made to feel at home!

Back at the field after lunch, the sun made an appearance and heated things up, and the flying became even better. The front that moved through brought a wind change and instead of approaching over the short beans, landing approaches were made over the head-high corn. Without power to go around (in all but a few of the gliders), landing approaches had to be planned carefully.

Most of my life has been spent as a city dweller, so I never fully appreciated the ability of corn stalks to reach up and snatch a sailplane out of midair, but apparently it can happen. Horizon Hobby pilot Dustin Buescher had to retrieve his E-flite Blanik from the corn and earned the cornfield award in the process. Another glider took nearly three hours and a camera-equipped quadcopter to locate and retrieve.

After watching this action, I made sure I landed with plenty of room to spare, because after the aforementioned rain, folks returning from rescue missions were covered with mud that appeared to be the consistency of drying concrete.

After another early overcast cleared out on Saturday, the line formed quickly. Late that morning, the line was such that a second towplane was pressed into service. Most of the towing was done with 100cc- and 120cc-powered 1/3-scale Piper Pawnees from Hangar 9.

Peter Goldsmith had a 3W 1/3-scale Super Cub covered in a Spektrum scheme that was used to tow some of the largest gliders, but the Pawnees and the Horizon tow pilots did a spectacular job of keeping things moving smoothly. Former Tournament of Champions winner, Steve Stricker, took several long shifts towing and won the Best Tow Pilot plaque for his effort, but all of the tow pilots did a marvelous job in the often challenging conditions.



Hangar 9 Pawnees did most of the towing, with Peter Goldsmith’s 3W Super Cub doing the heavy hauling. Tow pilots included (L-R) David Payne, Steve Stricker, John Diniz, Peter Goldsmith, Rick Shelby, and Craig Greening.



Peter Goldsmith took time out to relax and enjoy some glider flying with his wife, Caroline.



As flying wrapped up Saturday evening, the smell of barbecue wafting across the field had stomachs rumbling. After dinner, a large number of raffle prizes, including several foam models, an E-flite Allusive, and even a DX9 radio, were raffled off to a lot of smiles from the winners.

Whenever I go to an event, I look for a project that stands out and this trip was no exception. There were several of the popular E-flite Blaniks at the event—at one point I counted eight within sight while waiting for a towplane. Several were repainted or decorated with different graphics, but Peter George, from St. Louis, took his a step further.

In addition to a full cockpit, Peter repainted his Blanik and added custom graphics. Using sign vinyl that was a slightly different shade than the paint, Pete created squares to simulate aluminum panels, then used a fine point marker to draw panel lines and rivets over the entire airframe.

The Blanik has a 4.2-meter wingspan and a bulky fuselage, so covering this entire model in rivets and panel lines is no small task. I suppose this is what you do when you can’t fly year round. Pete took home the well-deserved Blanik Achievement Award for his efforts.

Bashing an ARF is one thing, but Michael Kelly, from Taylorsville, Kentucky, brought two scratch-built gliders that he can only be described as stunning. The Pilots’ Choice award went to his 1/4-scale Vampyr, based on a German glider designed in the early 1920s. Spanning slightly more than 3 meters, Michael built a version with wing warping, but to get more roll control, he converted to the 1921 version of the Vampyr that featured regular ailerons. Neither the Vampyr nor his 1/6-scale Balestruccio would look out of place on the judging table at Top Gun.



Peter George, from St. Louis, has the spoilers out as he brings in his Hempel 1/2-scale KA-6. Pete did plenty of work on this glider, making the spoilers scale accurate and adding a cockpit.



Mike Kelly, from Kentucky, held back no secrets when discussing how he scratch-built and detailed this beautiful 1/4-scale Vampyr, a 1920s German design.



Caroline Goldsmith presents a well-deserved Best Model/Pilots’ Choice Award to Mike Kelly for his scratch-built 1/4-scale Vampyr.



With a long drive back to Florida ahead, I packed up and hit the road early Sunday morning. I had plenty of time to reflect on my experience and started putting my thoughts together for this article. I enjoyed myself immensely and the weather didn’t hamper my enthusiasm one bit—in fact, it made taking time away from the field for the tour a decision I didn’t have to make. The Horizon Hobby staff worked hard to make everyone feel not only welcome, but like family.

The flying was awesome. I made more tow flights in three days than I usually do in three months, but spending three days hanging out with people whom I only get to see a few times a year was—as the commercial says—priceless.

I’m sure I’ll miss a few people who deserve personal mention, but Pete Goldsmith kept the flightline moving smoothly and the tow pilots organized, and Missie and her crew kept pilot registration, the raffle, and food concessions running without a hitch. Spektrum guru Andy Kunz spent Friday afternoon at the field helping anyone with Spektrum questions or issues. Len performed maiden flights on several people’s new gliders and helped anyone who asked.

If you’re interested in aerotowing, make plans to attend next year’s Horizon Hobby AeroTow. Some people shy away from events because they feel they aren’t expert pilots or for other reasons, when in fact, you won’t find more expertise, better help, or nicer people who will do anything to make sure you have a positive experience and get whatever assistance you need. Who knows, you might even make a whole new group of friends!
—Andrew Griffith
andy@customcutgraphix.com

Additional photos


Sources

Horizon Hobby AeroTow
www.facebook.com/events/395495777277711

Great Planes F-1 Rocket Evo GP/EP ARF

$
0
0


Written by Tom Sullivan
A sport scale model designed to go fast
Abridged product review
Photos by the author
Read the full product review in the February 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Specifications

Model type: Semiscale ARF
Skill level: Intermediate to advanced
Wingspan: 52 inches
Wing area: 448 square inches
Airfoil: Semisymmetrical
Length: 44 inches
Weight: 6 to 7 pounds
Power system: .46-.55 two-stroke; .70 four-stroke; equivalent electric motor
Radio: Recommended: four channels; five servos
Street price: $179.99


Test-model Details

Radio system: Futaba 8FG radio; R617FS Futaba receiver; four S9001 Futaba servos; a Futaba Y harness; and two 9-inch servo extensions
Power system: O.S. GGT10 gas engine
Propeller: Falcon 12 x 8
Ready-to-fly weight: 5.5 pounds
Flight duration: Up to 30 minutes


Pluses

• Laser-cut balsa and plywood for fuselage construction; balsa sheeted foam cores for the wings.
• Includes all control hardware, wheels, fiberglass wheel pants, and cowl.
• All control surfaces come prehinged and glued from the factory.
• The firewall comes predrilled and includes preinstalled T-nuts.


Minus

• The engine-mounting location is described as being in two different locations in the manual.


Product Review

I like to think of myself as somewhat knowledgeable about nearly any airplane that’s ever been flown—that was until I was asked about reviewing the F-1 Rocket Evo. Having just reviewed a Radial Rocket, I first thought it was a similar design; however, this kit from Great Planes is quite different.

This kit is a semiscale model of the full-scale homebuilt aircraft manufactured by the Team Rocket Aircraft Co. Its all-metal airframe was designed to deliver extremely high performance with a 3,500-feet-per-minute climb rate and a 230-plus-mph cruising speed. Obviously, the review kit won't quite hit these speeds.




Nothing but balsa, plywood, and fiberglass is used in the F-1 Rocket Evo’s airframe. It comes with a complete hardware package, including a spinner.


This is a well-constructed model. The entire airframe is assembled from laser-cut balsa and plywood, making it quite lightweight. The MonoKote covering over the airframe and the matching paint of the cowl and wheelpants are eye-catching. The amount of work that was done at the factory should make the airframe assembly a breeze.

You need to decide how you’ll power your Rocket. Parts are included for either electric or fuel powerplants. If you go the electric route, laser-cut wood parts are included to build up the motor box that holds the motor in place, basically extending the firewall forward. On the bottom of the fuselage, behind the wing saddle, is a series of cooling exits beneath the covering. Cutting away the covering will open up the vent holes needed to cool the battery and ESC.


Flying

When it was time for the maiden flight, and with the GGT10 engine singing along, the Rocket tracked down the runway with a minimal amount of steering input and took off with authority. It took a few passes to get the trim dialed in, and with the photo passes out of the way, it was time to push the F-1 Rocket Evo’s limits.

It flies as though it’s on rails, especially when pushing it at high speeds. Goose-bump-raising low passes are rock solid, even when flying inverted.

But there’s more to flying than high-speed passes, and the F-1 Rocket Evo delivers. It is an aerobatic model and is as happy with simple rolls and loops as it is with violent snaps and spins. Throw anything you want at it and it delivers predictably.

When you’re done tearing up the sky, the Rocket will settle down and cruise with no bad habits or risks of stalling. The controls remain responsive all the way down to landing speed, and that’s reassuring regardless of your skill level.




The Great Planes F-1 Rocket Evo is a great design and fun to fly. Coupling it with the O.S. GGT10 gas engine, you can fly all day for only a few bucks.


In Conclusion

I’ve fallen in love with this little Great Planes F-1 Rocket Evo. It looks great with its white, yellow, purple, and teal color scheme. It’s not a big model, so it will easily fit into my car’s trunk for a quick run to the field, but it flies bigger than it is.

I love opening it up for low inverted passes, then pushing full down so it races skyward while I add in a series of rolls. There’s not enough power to hover, or go vertically ballistic, nor should there be.

The F-1 Rocket Evo is a great design and just plain fun to fly. Coupling it with the GGT10 gas engine, I can have fun all day for only a few bucks. What a deal!
—Tom Sullivan
tmsullivan@roadrunner.com


Video


Manufacturer/Distributor

Great Planes
(800) 637-7660
www.greatplanes.com


Sources

O.S. Engines
(217) 398-8970
www.osengines.com

Futaba
(217) 398-8970
www.futabarc.com

F-1 Rocket Evo manual and addendum
www.manuals.hobbico.com/gpm/gpma1030-manual.pdf
www.manuals.hobbico.com/gpm/gpma1030-addendum.pdf



Maxford USA Curtiss Pusher ARF

$
0
0


Written by Jon Barnes
Experience the thrill of early aviation
Abridged product review
Photos by the author
Read the full product review in the February 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Specifications

Model type: 1/9-scale sport electric ARF
Skill level: Intermediate
Wingspan: 50 inches
Wing area: 788 square inches
Length: 48.5 inches
Weight: 5.5 to 6 pounds
Power system: NTM 35-42-1,000 Kv brushless outrunner with 50-amp speed controller; 11 x 7 APC E propeller
Radio: Tactic TTX850 eight-channel 2.4 GHz SLT transmitter; Tactic TR624 six-channel 2.4 GHz SLT receiver
Construction: Balsa, plywood, and composite
Covering: Two colors of Mylar covering
Street price: $229.99


Test-model Details

Motor used: NTM 35-42 1,000 Kv brushless outrunner
Battery: Turnigy Nano-tech 4S 3,300 mAh 65C LiPo
Propeller: APC E 11 x 7
Radio system: Tactic TTX850 eight-channel 2.4 GHz SLT transmitter; Tactic TR624 six-channel 2.4 GHz SLT receiver; two Futaba S3156 servos; three Hextronics HXT-900 9-gram servos
Ready-to-fly weight: 5 pounds, 8 ounces
Flight duration: 5 minutes


Pluses

• A unique model that allows pilots to recreate the early days of aviation.
• Factory-prepared slots and boxes allow all airframe components to key together nicely.
• In-flight performance enhances the scale realism of the model.
• The model can be completed and flown using economical electronic components.


Minuses

• Difficult to source an appropriate pilot figure.
• Model requires a substantial amount of ballast in the nose to achieve the recommended CG.
• Exposed servo leads detract from overall scale realism.


Product Review

What do the Rumpler Taube, the Blériot XI, and the Curtiss Model D all have in common? All three airplanes harken to the infancy of fixed-wing aviation. They each made their first flights shortly after the start of the 20th century (1909-1911). This, however, is not the only thing that united these three vintage aircraft. More relevant to the readers of this magazine is that all are available as RC models from Maxford USA.

Although many mainstream model manufacturers focus on creating new versions of commonly modeled airplanes, Maxford USA has earned a reputation for offering a stimulating variety of ARF kits based on infrequently modeled and vintage airplanes. I was interested to see Maxford announce the release of its 1/9-scale 1911 Curtiss Model D and I eagerly agreed to review the kit.

The prebuilt airframe components are covered in a two-tone Mylar covering scheme. The upper side of the airplane is covered in a cream color, while the bottom side has a translucent yellow covering that shows off the airframe’s wooden skeleton and attempts to replicate the look of the full-scale airplane’s undercambered wings.

Maxford offers an appropriate size electric power system, along with several optional components that can enhance the aircraft’s scalelike appearance.




Many of the kit’s components come partially assembled. This helps to speed the build along.


Flying

I wanted to verify that the selected power system would possess ample power to propel the model up and into the sky. An Eagle Tree Systems eLogger revealed that the NTM outrunner motor and 11 x 7 propeller were good for slightly more than 800 watts static.

I was pleased to discover that although the nose gear is fixed, the small rudder exerts enough authority to induce gradual turns. Quick bursts of throttle, with the ensuing airflow across the rudder, allow a pilot to make modest steering corrections.

I slowly eased the throttle forward and let the Model D accelerate down the runway. It did not take much runway or elevator input to coax the biplane into the air. The sight of the Curtiss breaking ground and climbing out was exhilarating! With a half dozen clicks of down-elevator applied, the model felt trimmed out.

I noticed a slight tendency for the nose to slowly rise while flying around the pattern. With the flight taking place shortly after dawn and nothing more than a faint whisper of wind present, this tendency could not be attributed to flying upwind or downwind. I theorize that the foreplane, a control surface typically lacking in the models that we fly, could be responsible for generating extra lift, but the effect was subtle and easily remedied with a slight bump of down-elevator.

With the throttle slightly below 50%, I made a wide, sweeping turn through base and onto final approach. With the throttle pulled back to roughly a third, the Curtiss Pusher adopted a shallow rate of descent. Once across the numbers, I slowly rolled the throttle back. The model responded by reconnecting with, and sticking to, the runway surface with no sign of a bounce.




Maxford USA did a nice job of capturing the essence of this historically significant pusher-configuration airplane. The model’s lone graphic comes preapplied on the square-shaped rudder.


Conclusion

In an era where few modelers know what building an airplane out of a box of sticks is and most ARFs can be assembled in less than an hour, without even so much as a drop of adhesive required, the Maxford Curtiss Model D offers a refreshing respite.

Although not a full-blown kit, assembling this ARF will require modelers to invest more than a mere evening or two of time. Many of Maxford USA’s models, such as the Curtiss Model D Pusher, are uniquely based on seldom-modeled aircraft.

When the build is complete, a pilot will have an old-timey airplane that honestly does look as fantastic as it flies!
—Jon Barnes
barnesjonr@yahoo.com


Video


Manufacturer/Distributor

Maxford USA
(562) 529-3988
www.maxfordusa.com


Sources

Tactic
(217) 398-0007
www.tacticrc.com

HobbyKing
www.hobbyking.com



Horizon Hobby E-flite Pulse 15E BNF Basic

$
0
0


Written by John Kauk
The popular sport model now comes in a foam version
Abridged product review
Photos by the author
Read the full product review in the February 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Specifications

Model type: Sport
Skill level: Intermediate
Wingspan: 55 inches
Wing area: 551 square inches
Airfoil: Semisymmetrical
Length: 45 inches
Weight: 3.7 pounds
Power system: BL 15-size 880 Kv outrunner motor (installed); 40-amp ESC (installed); 3S 2,500 to 4,000 mAh LiPo battery (required)
Radio: Spektrum four-channel minimum (required)
Construction: Molded Z-Foam
Covering/finish: Paint, decals
Price: $ 239.99


Test-model Details

Power system: E-flite BL 15 motor (included); 12 x 8 propeller (included); 40-amp ESC (included); 3S 3,200 mAh LiPo battery (required)
Radio: Spektrum DX9 Black Edition transmitter; AR636A receiver (included)
Ready-to-fly weight: 3.6 pounds
Flight duration: 7 minutes


Pluses

• Super fast and easy assembly.
• Choice of two landing gear styles.
• Large hatch for easy battery access.
• AS3X receiver for stable, locked-in feel.


Minus

• No pilot figure in the cockpit.


Product review

Horizon Hobby’s series of Pulse sport models, originally designed by Mike McConville, has been around for a while. One of my club members has owned several of them, and they’ve all been well built and fun for him to fly. When I was given the opportunity to take a look at the new Pulse 15e BNF model, I knew it was an airplane that I would enjoy.

Delivered to my house double-boxed, with all parts sealed in plastic bags and securely fastened inside of a Styrofoam inner container, the Pulse arrived in perfect shape. A quick glance through the box contents revealed a nicely painted, molded Z-Foam airframe with all of the power and radio components installed, blue anodized main gear with wheels and wheel pants installed, and a bag with the rest of the parts required for completion.




Here are the parts as they come out of the box. Included are nicely molded Z-Foam airframe parts, blue anodized landing gear, and a bag of smaller parts that are ready for quick assembly.


Flying

I got together with my friend, Vernon Nelson, on a beautiful morning for test flights and photos. After a short briefing about the airplane’s setup, I set the throttle-activated timer for 6 minutes, carried the model out, and lined it up on the runway. When Vernon advanced the throttle, the Pulse tracked straight as it gained speed, and lifted off after a short run.

After a couple of circuits around the field and a bit of up-trim, Vernon was comfortable enough with the Pulse to begin making low-level passes and Figure Eights for photos. He commented on the airplane’s smooth handling and easy flight, and did a few rolls and loops to investigate its aerobatic capabilities.

When the DX9 radio’s voice alarm announced, “One minute remaining,” Vernon set up for the landing. Despite a slight crosswind, the final approach was steady and easy to keep in line thanks to the AS3X system smoothing the wind buffeting. Vernon made a picture-perfect landing.

Since that first day, I’ve flown the Pulse 15e quite a bit. The landing gear handles a grass runway with ease, and the wheel pants look great and don’t cause any problems.

In the air, the Pulse 15e is stable and easy to fly. It can be fast and responsive, and is capable of a full repertoire of standard aerobatic maneuvers. Slow flight is also stable and smooth. When the Pulse stalls, it usually drops its nose a little and keeps flying.

I’ve had a lot of fun pointing it into the wind, cutting the throttle back to a slow idle, and trying to keep it on the edge of stalling for as long as possible. Recovery is simple: apply some power and the airplane flies on.

Conclusion

The E-flite Pulse 15e BNF is a winner. Assembly is fast and easy with good parts’ fit and quality. It’s big enough to present well in the air and is a lot of fun to fly.

The AS3X receiver gives the model a locked-in feel in a wide range of conditions, which allows the pilot to focus more on flying the airplane and less on correcting for the wind. I think it would be a great model for an intermediate pilot moving from a trainer to something more challenging.
—John Kauk
john@kauk.net


Video


Manufacturer/Distriutor

Horizon Hobby
(800) 338-4639
www.e-fliterc.com


Sources

Spektrum
(800) 338-4639
www.spektrumrc.com

Tower Hobbies Piper J-3 40 Cub ARF

$
0
0


Written by Andrew Griffith
Get back to basics with this Giant Scale model
Abridged product review
Photos by Adam Strong and the author
Read the full product review in the February 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Specifications

Model type: Semiscale ARF
Skill level: Intermediate
Wingspan: 81 inches
Wing area: 984 square inches
Wing loading: 16.9 ounces per square foot
Airfoil: Flat bottom
Length: 49 inches
Weight: 7 pounds, 4 ounces
Engine: .40 to .46 two-stroke or .52 to .72 four-stroke
Radio: Four-channel minimum
Construction: Laser-cut balsa and light plywood
Covering/finish: Film covered in the classic Lock Haven Yellow Cub scheme with black trim
Street price: $179.97


Test-model Details

Engine used: O.S. 56FS-A four-stroke glow
Receiver battery: Hobbico LiFeSource 1,900 mAh
Propeller: 12 x 6 APC
Radio system: Tactic TTX610 2.4 GHz; TR624 six-channel receiver; HydriMax four-cell 2,000 mAh receiver battery; five TSX47 servos
Ready-to-fly weight: 7 pounds, 4 ounces
Flight duration: 15-plus minutes


Pluses

• Classic Cub looks.
• O.S. 56FS-A four-stroke engine has plenty of power and sounds great.
• One-piece wing makes for quick field assembly.
• Requires only a simple four-channel radio system with standard servos.
• Flying weight was less than specified.


Minuses

• One-piece 81-inch wing can be difficult to transport.
• No provisions for mounting floats.


Product Review

Perhaps no other aircraft defines “nostalgic” better than the Piper Cub. Much like the large number of full-scale Cubs produced, RC modelers simply love Cubs. The Cub might not be the most-frequently modeled full-scale airplane of all time, but if it’s behind the P-51 Mustang, it sure can’t be by much.

The Tower Hobbies Cub, with its 81-inch wingspan, is legal for Giant Scale events that retain the now-defunct International Miniature Aircraft Association (IMAA) 60/80 minimum wingspan rules. The Cub is completely built-up using laser-cut balsa and light plywood and covered in Cub yellow heat-shrink film with the classic black lightning bolt trim scheme.

A quick peek inside the fuselage made me think of it as more of an old-school kit-built model rather than a jig-built ARF because it looks pretty stout.




The parts were unpacked and organized before starting. Other than sealing the edges on the various cutouts where required, the covering required little work to remove wrinkles or sags and held up well in the Florida summer sun.


Flying

The day of the test flight arrived with a light breeze directly across the runway. The sound of a four-stroke engine is hard to beat, and it really sounds at home on a Cub. With a tank of fuel run through the engine for some adjustments, it was time to see how the Cub flew.

With the aircraft lined up on centerline, I held in a bit of right rudder and slowly advanced the throttle. The tail came up quickly and before I was past half throttle, the Cub was airborne in less than 50 feet. Several clicks of left aileron and a couple of clicks of up-elevator, and the airplane was flying hands off at half throttle.

After a few laps to get the feel of things, I took the Cub up high and did the requisite stall test. With the nose pointed into the mild wind, I decreased the power and progressively added elevator to keep the nose level until it stalled.

The Cub slowed and I thought it was just going to mush forward until, with little warning, it dropped a wing and entered a spin from which it took a few turns to recover. I repeated the test and got the same result.

Relaxing the controls stopped the spin, and letting the Cub fly out as power is added made recovery easy. Although this might sound a little dramatic, by the time the airplane stalled the airspeed was very slow and the controls were completely ineffective.

Back under power, it was time to put the Cub through its paces. The O.S. 56FS-A has plenty of power without being heavy and overpowered. Most of my flying was done at half throttle. I only needed full power to pull the Cub over the top for big loops. The rudder is effective and the Cub does great-looking stall turns and respectable knife-edge flight.

Wheel landings and touch-and-gos look great, but the wire gear can be a little bouncy. If you set it down too hard, the Cub will bounce. I tried some hot-dogging by running the Cub down the runway on one wheel, but the wire landing gear wasn’t stiff enough.

I’m not sure what the total flight time was, but after flying for more than 15 minutes, there was still plenty of fuel visible in the tank. You could probably do touch-and-gos for 30 minutes.


Conclusion

The Tower Hobbies J-3 Cub is a pleasure to fly and the O.S. four-stroke engine provides plenty of power and has the perfect sound for this airplane. Assembly takes roughly 15 hours, so a few evenings in the shop or a rainy weekend will have you ready to head to the field.

If you’re a fan of Cubs—and let’s face it, most of us are—the Tower Hobbies J-3 Cub is a good, solid performer. The only potential drawback I found was that transporting an 81-inch, one-piece wing might pose a problem for people with smaller vehicles, but for an afternoon of touch-and-gos, the Cub is hard to beat.
—Andrew Griffith
andy@customcutgraphix.com


Video


Manufacturer/Distributor

Tower Hobbies
(800) 637-6050
www.towerhobbies.com


Sources

Tactic
(800) 637-7660
www.tacticrc.com

O.S. Engines
(800) 637-7660
www.osengines.com

APC Propellers
(530) 661-0399
www.apcprop.com

RTL Fasteners
(800) 239-6010
www.rtlfasteners.com

Great Planes
(800) 637-7660
www.greatplanes.com

Frank Tiano Enterprises
(863) 607-6611
www.franktiano.com



Tucscon Aerobatic Shootout 2015

$
0
0


Written by Mike Hurley
Competition brings out the best
Event coverage
Photos by the author
As seen in the Februrary 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Sponsors

Desert Aircraft
JR
Dalton
RC Depot
Performance Aircraft Unlimited
MKS Servos USA
Classic Awards
Flying Giants
AeroGraphix
PowerBox Systems
Falcon Propeller
Horizon Hobby


Event coverage

It has been three years since Desert Aircraft (DA) has hosted the Tucson Aerobatic Shootout. Giant Scale Aerobatics enthusiasts feared that we might have seen our last Tucson Aerobatic Shootout, but this year, Dave Johnson and his team at DA went all out and made this event one of the best ever. Tony Russo, from DA USA, and Steve Richardson, from DA Australia, comanaged the contest.

This prestigious event is an AMA-sanctioned Scale Aerobatics contest based on International Miniature Aerobatic Club (IMAC) rules and guidelines, but with a bit of customization to fit the, ahem, “scale” of the competition. The Tucson Aerobatic Shootout differs from standard IMAC pilot categories in that there is no Basic class. In IMAC, Basic is a place to start and learn the ropes; it should be inviting and fun without the pressure of strong competition.

Pilots in the Shootout are well beyond entry level and believe me, the pressure and competition is intense in all classes. In the tradition of the venerable Tournament of Champions, there is a class for what I would call the professional-level pilots. The Invitational class is for the elite few—those who have competed on a world level and won. These pilots are the Arnold Palmers or Michael Jordans of our sport—dominant on a world level.

The classes are as follows: Sportsman, Intermediate, Advanced, Unlimited, Invitational, and Freestyle. Each is a separate competition.

This year, for the first time, Freestyle pilots were allowed entry into the Tucson Aerobatic Shootout without being required to compete in the Precision portion of the contest. For some Scale Aerobatics enthusiasts, this new change will be controversial. In the last five years or so, a rift has grown between those who prefer Freestyle flying and those who prefer Precision. Some believe that you must be able to do both to be a well-rounded pilot, but the world is changing, and as Dave Johnson explained to me, there are more “specialists” in each category.

The creators of the Tucson Aerobatic Shootout want the best Freestyle and the best Precision pilots, and they want the event to be a show not to miss. Precision flying is arguably not a spectator sport. Freestyle is where the excitement lies, and the Tucson Aerobatic Shootout is an exciting spectator event because of the Freestyle competition.

Most of the pilots fly only in their own Precision class. To make it slightly harder on these fliers, each class has three separate sequences to fly each day: an Unknown sequence that changes each day of the competition, a Known sequence created especially for the Tucson Aerobatic Shootout, and the 2015 IMAC Known sequences. A pilot flies one sequence per flight (as opposed to two sequences per flight in IMAC) of each of the separate patterns, and each day a new Unknown pattern will be given to the pilot to fly unpracticed.

Mornings in the pit area are intense, with pilots studying and straining to stay focused on the day’s first Unknown sequences. Each pilot watches previous fliers to see how they do and where they miss an element, making sure to understand the sequence and avoid the same mistake. The flying at this level in all of the classes is outstanding, but pilots do miss a point roll or overrotate a snap here and there, and mistakes like that are costly. How costly?



Veteran international Scale Aerobatics competitor and past champion, Frazier Briggs, visualizes by “dry flying” his Unknown sequence. Frazier, from New Zealand, has been flying in the large US competitions for many years.



The Tucson Aerobatic Shootout is one of only a couple of what I consider professional-level competitions. I infer professional level, not only because these pilots are the best of their class, but also because the purse is more than $100,000 in cash and prizes. Of course, the money isn’t really the attraction for most of these fliers—just to say you’ve competed at the Tucson Aerobatic Shootout brings a high level of prestige, so pilots come from around the world. This year, the Shootout saw pilots from Austria, Australia, New Zealand, France, Canada, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Japan, and across the US.



This young man is learning early and helping his dad, advanced pilot Jorge Berra. The family came from Mexico to fly in the shootout.



I spent most of Thursday and Friday taking pictures in the pits, talking with pilots, and watching the Precision rounds. The wind had been high both days, making the Precision flights that much more difficult, but late Friday evening, as the first Freestyle round approached, the weather began to look more ominous. Spectators and pilots alike were anxious to see the Freestyle, but the wind was relentless and dark clouds headed our way.

In the pilots’ meeting, there was a vote to see if they would fly. If all of the pilots were unable to complete their rounds, all of the flights would have to be scratched. They voted to fly. And the rain started. And we waited.



Freestyle competitor, Matt Stringer, checks for rain as the pilots take a vote on whether to fly in possible rain and thunderstorms.



People on the flightline huddled under the judges’ canopies for approximately 30 minutes, waiting for the rain to subside. It was getting late and the weather drove most of the spectators out of the stands, but soon the rain slowed enough to allow competition to start.

The first several pilots endured wind as much as 30 mph and light sprinkling rain. They flew well despite the wind, but the storm that had moved past turned, the wind shifted direction, and the black cloud again headed our way, moving fast.

Bryant Mack, from Phoenix, had begun his Freestyle flight as the storm approached. Bryant was flying a 35% PAU Extra 300 with a DA-120. He was roughly 2 minutes into his 4-minute flight when the wind picked up and the rain hit hard. Undaunted, Bryant continued his flight, thunder clapping, rain pouring down, and lyrics to Flux Pavilion’s “I Can’t Stop” somehow guiding his routine.

It was one of the most heart-stopping, unbelievable flights I’ve ever seen. Everyone wondered if he was going to call it and land, but Bryant kept flying. I stood there, jaw hanging open in complete awe and admiration for his tenacity and skill. The flight was spectacular.

Bryant later said that the wind was at his back and his transmitter was getting little direct water, but the rain was killing the uplines, with the engine sucking in water as he throttled to full power. After Bryant landed, everyone scrambled for cover beneath the ramada.



Not every Freestyle session was flown in the rain. This is the competition-winning 35% PAU Extra flown by Gabriel Altuz of Puerto Rico. Gabriel flew only in the Freestyle competition.



The only other pilot to fly exclusively in the Freestyle portion of the contest was 16-year-old Jace Dussia, who placed third. Jace uses blinding speed and precision as the cornerstone of his style.



Saturday was finally sunny with soft white clouds, yet significant wind was still present the entire day. There were two Freestyle rounds to fly on Saturday, and I was keen to see the difference in styles.

Most 3-D fliers say that the sweet spot for a Freestyle airplane is the 35% size, but several pilots flew 40% models and a couple even flew the same airplane in both Precision and Freestyle competitions. The “throw-down-style” fliers fly fast and furious, while more traditional Freestyle routines lean toward flowing and graceful routines.

A 40% airplane won’t roll at five revolutions per second, but pilots with smaller models seem to use this as a staple in their routines. The European fliers all used 40% models in their Freestyle routines, and flew a more exacting and varied routine.

Werner Kohlberger, from Austria, flew a fully composite 41% Krill Extra 300SC, and in part of his sequence he flew to the Viennese Waltz. Very clever!



All the way from Austria, Werner Kohlberger flew this 40% Krill composite Extra 300SC in the Freestyle event. Werner had a smooth, graceful style that incorporated metaphor and choreography into his routine.



Gernot Bruckmann, also from Austria and also flying a 41% Krill, used extreme precision and original elements in his flights with great success. Some say his flights were more traditional, but he was so skillful that he made his model seem graceful—even while flying it flat out.

Only two pilots flew in Freestyle who did not fly in the Precision portion of the contest—Jase Dussia and Gabriel Altuz. Both flew throw-down style with speed and agility as their mainstay. This flying style is usually like a bull in a china shop, but not with these two. Both of these pilots had absolute mastery, and even at breakneck speed in rifle rolls, their precision was staggering.

In the end, the throw-down style impressed the judges enough to award Gabriel a first-place finish. Jase was awarded third. But who says the more traditional style and larger airplanes can’t be competitive in the Freestyle competition? Gernot placed second with his big Extra and a precise, original style.

The Freestyle competition is fun and exciting to watch, but for most of these pilots, the measure of skill is still decided in the Precision portion of a contest. Andrew Jesky took home a check for $12,000 for his win as the top invitational pilot. Gernot Bruckmann was second, and David Moser brought home a third-place finish.



Andrew Jesky won the invitational class and a check for $12,000 flying a 13-year-old Robert Godfrey-designed Extra 300 that has been refitted with a DA-200 engine.



Contests of this caliber take plenty of work and dedication by unwavering enthusiasts. We are privileged that Desert Aircraft and all of its volunteers and sponsors support this event. Dave Johnson told me that the Tucson Aerobatic Shootout will likely alternate years with the Clover Creek Invitational, held every other year in Tennessee. Next year I hope to see these pilots in Tennessee, and I look forward to coming back to the Tucson Aerobatic Shootout in 2017.
—Mike Hurley
mhurley222@comcast.net


Additional Photos


Sources

Tucson Aerobatic Shootout
www.tucsonaerobaticshootout.com

IMAC
www.mini-iac.com




EXPOsed

$
0
0



Highlights from the 2016 AMA Expo.

Each January, modelers along the West Coast travel to Ontario, California, to participate in one of AMA’s primary celebrations of the hobby of model aviation—the AMA Expo.

This year was no different. Nearly 6,000 attendees and more than 100 exhibitors gathered in the Ontario Convention Center on January 8-10, 2016, to ogle some of the newest products, reminisce over the last year’s events, and meet other hobbyists from across the country.

For those who weren’t able to attend this year’s AMA Expo, Model Aviation had the privilege of speaking with some of the vendors present at this year’s show about their latest modeling wares. Tune in to the videos below, and find out what each of these companies brought to exhibit at AMA’s annual trade show.

Guest Speaker Series

One of our favorite parts of AMA Expo is our series of featured speakers. This year’s lineup was impressive, to say the least, and the presenters shared some fascinating stories. Visit http://air.modelaircraft.org to listen to AMA Air’s one-on-one interviews with a few of these extraordinary guests, as well as interviews with AMA President Bob Brown and District Vice President Eric Williams.

Dates have already been announced for the 2017 AMA Expo. To learn more, visit www.amaexpo.com.




2106 AMA Expo Highlights



Horizon Hobby P2 Prometheus - AMA Expo 2016



Futaba CGY750 Flight Control System - AMA Expo 2016



Graupner Alpha 3Dcopter 300Q - AMA Expo 2016



Hitec Parkmaster Pro, Twinstar BL and Rockstar - AMA Expo 2016



Hobby People Space Walker Kit - AMA Expo 2016



Maxford USA Taube - AMA Expo 2016



Futaba T18MZ WC - AMA Expo 2016



Hobby People Quest Glider - AMA Expo 2016



Flex Innovations Aura - AMA Expo 2016



Flex Innovations Mamba - AMA Expo 2016



Hobbico New Multirotor Lineup - AMA Expo 2016



Hitec Multirotor ESCs - AMA Expo 2016




Great Planes Avistar GP/EP Sport Trainer

$
0
0


Written by Greg Gimlick
A Giant Scale Sport ARF
Product Review
Photos by the author
As seen in the March 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Specifications

• Model type: Giant Scale sport ARF
• Skill level: Intermediate builder/intermediate pilot
• Wingspan: 90.5 inches
• Wing area: 1,448 square inches
• Airfoil: Semisymmetrical
• Length: 77.25 inches
• Weight: 16.5 to 17.5 pounds
• Wing loading: 26 to 28 ounces per square feet
• Power system: 30 to 35cc gas engine or 63-62-250 kV brushless electric motor; 60-amp ESC; two 4S 14.8-volt 5,000 mAh or two 5S 18.5-volt • 5,000 mAh LiPo batteries
• Radio: Four-plus-channel transmitter with receiver and minimum five high-torque servos; 3,200 mAh LiFe receiver battery
• Accessories and hardware: Servo extensions and Y connectors according to your setup
• Construction: Built-up wood
• Covering: MonoKote
• Street price: $449.99


Test-model Details

• Motor used: RimFire 1.60 (63-62-250) brushless outrunner motor
• Propeller: APC 20 x 10E or APC 18 x 8E
• Battery: FlightPower FP50 5,000 mAh 5S 18.5-volt LiPos (two in series)
• Radio system: Futaba 14SG 14-channel 2.4 GHz FASST transmitter; Futaba R7008SB receiver; seven Futaba S9072SB servos, two Futaba S3001 servos (in floats), Futaba S.Bus Hub 4 Port, Futaba S.Bus SBC-1 Channel Changer; two Futaba S.Bus Servo Hub Cables
• Ready-to-fly weight: 16 pounds, 5 ounces (21 pounds on floats)
• Flight duration: 8 to 10 minutes


Pluses

• Built-up construction.
• Large, easy battery access.
• Great flight characteristics.
• Flap option is easy to add.
• Tricycle and tail-dragger landing gear options both included.
• Excellent covering job.
• Easy assembly.
• Great power.
• Fast to assemble at the field.


Minus

• Aileron and flap control horns don’t use backplates.


Product Review

When two boxes this big arrive, it’s hard not to be impressed—the UPS delivery person certainly was. When I unpacked the parts, I was even more impressed with the job someone at the warehouse did, packing so much fully covered parts into the boxes and shipping them without damage. Everything was beautifully wrapped and protected.

Close inspection of all of the parts found them to be perfect. The option of installing tricycle or conventional tail-dragger landing gear was nice, including wheel pants and gear pieces provided for both. I also got the floats, which were equally impressive and well packed.

The thorough instruction manual includes directions on setting up the S.Bus system if you choose. Because I have a Futaba 14SG, this was a no-brainer. The assembly illustrations and description make this a perfect model for someone new to Giant Scale flying. The covering scheme was so nice that I nearly didn’t apply the decals.


Assembly

Begin the assembly by thoroughly reading the instruction manual. This will alert you to a couple of areas where you need to decide how you want to do things. Determine now whether you’re going to install the S.Bus system, the type of gear you want to use, and whether you want flaps or not. The manual walks you through these decisions.

I labeled each servo for its intended use and programmed them with the S.Bus SBC-1 device. If you’ve never done this, it is clearly explained in the manual. You’ll wonder why all of your airplanes aren’t wired this way once you do it.

This is also the time to carefully inspect the covering and seal any loose areas. Surprisingly, I found none, but I did go over the main seams, especially on the floats.

Assembly begins with installing the wing servos. The holes are precut and perfectly sized for standard servos. There are strings inside the wing to easily pull your extensions through. If you’re using flaps, you’ll have to cut them loose from the ailerons at this time. I was impressed with the way Great Planes designed that option and it’s one I’ve never seen used before.

Each flap is attached to the aileron with two dowels glued through the ends of the control surfaces. If you don’t use flaps, the ailerons consist of the aileron and flap joined together. A simple cut with a razor saw separates them and everything is ready to connect to the servos.

My flap and servo wires connected to the S.Bus hub extension so only one wire exits each wing half. It doesn’t matter where you plug them into the fuselage hub because the servos know what they’re for from earlier programming.

I wish the control horns on the flaps and ailerons were drilled through and used backplates. Instead, they are partially drilled and secured with #4 x 5/8 screws. Hardening the holes with CA glue keeps them secure, but on a Giant Scale airplane, I prefer backplates for extra security.

All of the control rods use threaded clevises on one end and soldered clevises on the other. Silver solder works best and there is a soldering tutorial in the manual. The only problem I ran into was the plating on the inside of the clevis that required some filing before I could get the solder to adhere. Remember, the surfaces have to be extremely clean.

The tail surfaces already have the covering removed from the gluing surfaces—what a great surprise that was! I test-fitted the pieces and ensured that they would be square when glued, and then installed the wing for reference.

Measure everything carefully and then measure it again to make sure it’s properly positioned before bracing it for the epoxy to dry. Do not try to use 5-minute epoxy. You’ll need more time to get it right. I used 30-minute epoxy, braced everything after it was true, and cleaned up any excess with alcohol before it set.

Landing gear is the next step and it requires you to decide which configuration you want. I’m partial to tail-draggers, so I went with that, but pieces for both are included.

It’s simply a matter of bolting them in place and connecting the steering mechanisms. Again, each method is carefully explained in the manual. The preinstalled blind nuts on the wheel pants are perfectly aligned with the landing gear legs.




The tail wheel assembly is installed, along with the elevator and rudder horns. The tail wheel assembly fits into predrilled holes with plastic bushings.


Radio installation in the fuselage is next, along with connecting the control rods to the tail surfaces. A battery/receiver tray slides into place behind the servos. Test-fit everything and secure it with epoxy.

The tail surface control rods are installed in the same way as were the ailerons and flaps. The guide/support tubes are already glued in place. Align the control horns, drill the surfaces, and secure with bolts in the usual fashion. Everything lined up nicely with the pushrod tubes for free and easy motion.


Motor/Engine Installation

Whether you’re using electric power or a gas engine, the installation method is clearly described in the manual. Each type of power has been carefully planned and the included pieces make for easy installation with particular notes included, depending on your brand of powerplant. Someone put a lot of thought into this.

I used a RimFire 1.60 motor, ElectriFly Silver Series 80-amp ESC, and two FlightPower FP50-series 5S 5,000 mAh LiPo batteries. I had previously installed such systems using the Great Planes brushless motor mount for large motors, but because the Avistar included a plywood box assembly, I decided to go with that.

It is an ingenious design that, when glued together, won’t come apart. It’s more than strong enough to withstand anything I throw at it. I also like this method because it’s completely modular, so removing it brings the motor, mount, and ESC all off together.

Be sure to use threadlocker on the bolts that hold things to the blind nuts. The ESC bolts to the bottom of the mount and gets a nice airflow. The wires to the battery extend back through the firewall to the battery compartment.

The batteries are connected in series to provide the 10S power I chose for the Avistar. You can also use an 8S setup and larger propeller. I used the APC 20 x 10E propeller suggested for the 8S setup on my 10S version, and I’m mindful of full throttle times and spikes. Using good throttle management, I can keep within the limits of the motor and ESC according to the data logger I used for the test flights.




The motor and batteries are installed. The batteries are connected in series to provide 10S power.


The motor/engine installation is completed by attaching the cowl and drilling it for retaining screws after it is properly aligned. Again, if you’ve never had to do this job, the manual walks you through a method that ensures success and can be used on future models.


Control Throws and CG

I used the recommended throws and center of gravity (CG). With my pack approximately an inch back from the firewall, my CG fell close to the recommended 41/2-inch mark. The acceptable range is from 41/2 inches to 57/16 inches back from the leading edge, so there is plenty of room to play with. Mine is currently at the 43/4-inch mark and works well for my flying style.

There is a ton of room in the battery compartment to adjust the battery’s position to attain whatever CG you prefer. When I installed the floats, I moved the battery almost to the firewall to get the CG right for float flying.

I set the control throws to the high- and low-rate settings in the manual. I’m happy flying on the high rates, but the low rates will nicely tame the Avistar if you’re new to Giant Scale and want to ease into aerobatic flight. I used 25% exponential on all surfaces and eventually increased the rudder throw to the maximum I could get to help the aircraft’s knife-edge capability.


Float Installation

This is a beautiful set of floats and again, all of the hard work is done for you. Assembly begins with the water rudders, which is simply a matter of bolting the pieces in place. Each side is the same and each side has its own servo. This eliminates issues found with floats that connect their rudders to the airplane rudder via some sort of flexible pushrod. Even if one side were to fail, the other side still has a servo driving it.

Each servo mounts in a preinstalled tray with a hatch cover that is predrilled for its hold-down screws. You have the option of sealing the cover with tape or making a silicone gasket. I chose the gasket method detailed in the instructions.

This easy step provides clean installation and ensures that it is watertight. The pushrod to each rudder exits through a tube that is sealed on the inside of the float. I took the extra measure of putting a blob of petroleum jelly in the end of each tube to help prevent water from entering, but I doubt that it’s necessary.

The gear legs for the floats and crossmembers are attached to the floats with L brackets and everything is predrilled. Loosely assemble the structure until you bolt it to the fuselage and get everything aligned, then tighten everything down, being sure to use threadlocker on all of the screws.

Predrilled, installed blind nuts determine the placement on the fuselage. The front gear uses the same attaching points that the conventional gear used. A dorsal fin replaces the tail wheel assembly and screws into place. The only thing left is to channel the Y connector from the float servos up into the fuselage and attach them to the rudder channel. Be sure to double-check your CG after installing the floats.




Each float has its own servo and is joined with a Y connector. The completed water rudders are controlled with a pushrod through a tube to the internal servo.



Flying

Anytime I get a chance to fly the first production model in the country, it adds a touch of nerves to the test flight. This needn’t have been the case. The Avistar gracefully began its takeoff run and the tail was off the ground in no time, running on the main gear. It lifted off at half throttle and began its climb with ease.

What joy to see this big, beautiful Avistar head up and away without so much as a hint of excitement! A couple of times around the pattern to get a feel for the CG and control authority, and it was evident this was going to be fun.

Control throws on high rates were more than adequate, but not enough to startle me. Low rates are docile, but enough to ensure adequate control. I immediately thought this would make a great Giant Scale trainer too.

A quick climb to altitude for some stall tests showed that it never really stalls, and it falls off with the CG toward the front of the range. It slowly mushed along, never breaking one way or the other. It did officially stall and drop the nose on later flights with the CG moved aft, but there was never any tendency to snap. Slow-speed flight is a breeze, and flap tests showed it would land at almost a walking speed.

Now that I knew it could be a gentle flier, it was time to see if a bit of throttle would liven things up. Full throttle and vertical certainly opened it up to an array of aerobatic maneuvers. Loops, rolls, slow rolls, inverted, Cuban 8s, etc. are all easily done and graceful to perform. If you intend to do aerobatics, moving the CG toward the aft limit will make you happy.

The power available for these maneuvers is more than adequate and throttle management will serve you well. The one change I made to help the aerobatics was increasing the rudder throw to the maximum so I could perform better knife-edge maneuvers. Inverted flight takes a slight amount of down-elevator.


Float Flying

If you have never done any float flying, you’re in for a real treat. The Avistar would be a great first floatplane because it’s big and stable. The floats are designed and placed so the airplane will handle well in the water with no tendency to plow or sit back on the tail. The water rudders work exceptionally well and keep it controllable, even with a stiff breeze across the lake. I had no problem taxiing against current or waves.

Taking off from the water required slightly more power than the land-based flights, but it’s also 4 pounds, 11 ounces heavier. Slow throttle application had it up on the step in no time and its controllability was one of the best I’ve ever had in a seaplane. It lifted off gently and climbed out with ease while it shed water droplets from the floats that glimmered like crystals in the sun. Beautiful!

I did the same stall test and other tests with the float configuration and was more than satisfied with the results. Inverted flight took some effort, but it was possible. The big Avistar will do rolls with the floats, but it’s like a big pendulum when they swing back around for upright flight, so be ready.

There are no surprises on landing. I did some with and without flaps and I didn’t notice a huge difference. I suspect the floats add enough drag to slow things down anyway.

After the approach is set up, you can reduce the throttle and hold everything almost until touchdown. The airplane settled on the back half of the floats and immediately leveled to a perfect taxiing profile. The rescue boat was in the water just in case, but I never needed to use it.




The Great Planes Avistar would be a great first floatplane and the floats are designed and placed so the airplane will handle well in the water with no tendency to plow or sit back on the tail.



Conclusion

I love this airplane! Let me be clear—I really love this airplane! I love Giant Scale, but think many are better off with gas engines. This is not the case with the Great Planes Avistar! This model offers both options, but works exceptionally well as an electric-powered aircraft.

The battery pack is reasonably priced and very easy to install. This airplane is one of the easiest Giant Scale airplanes to assemble at the field. I don’t like spending 30 minutes assembling, and this one only takes approximately
7 minutes. The power system is perfectly matched to the airframe and you can set it up for training or go wild with aerobatics. It’s one airplane that covers a broad spectrum of flying styles.

Throw the floats on and you’ll instantly love the way it looks. I think it looks even better on floats than on the wheels. It would make a perfect first floatplane.

I was surprised that there was enough power to perform aerobatics with the floats installed. The crowd of fishermen that congregated at the lake to watch was testament to how impressive this airplane was. Sometimes I go out to the shop just to stare at it.


The Final Word

Great Planes just got it right with this one—it matches the name perfectly!
—Greg Gimlick
maelectrics@gimlick.com


Bonus video


Manufacturer/Distributor:

Great Planes
(800) 637-7660
www.greatplanes.com


Sources:

ElectriFly
(217) 398-8970
www.electrifly.com

Futaba
(217) 398-8970
www.futaba-rc.com

FlightPower
(888) 598-8037
www.flightpowerbatteries.com

APC Propellers
(530) 661-0399
www.apcprop.com





Multiplex ParkMaster Pro

$
0
0


Written by Josh Bernstein
This electric-powered 3-D/aerobatic model is a real performer
Product review
Photos by Jon Barnes
Read the full product review in the March 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Specifications

• Model type: Electric 3-D/aerobatic ARF
• Skill level: Intermediate to advanced
• Wingspan: 38.375 inches
• Wing area: 450 square inches
• Length: 40.5 inches
• Wing loading: 5.9 ounces per square inch
• Weight: 18.4 ounces
• Power system: Brushless electric outrunner
• Radio: Minimum four-channel 2.4 GHz transmitter
• Construction: Elapor foam
• Street price: Kit Plus $205.99; Kit $103.99


Test-model Details

• Motor used: Himax HC2816 1220 Kv brushless outrunner (included)
• ESC: Hitec Energy Sport 20-amp air ESC (included)
• Battery: Turnigy nano-tech 3S 850 mAh LiPo
• Propeller: APC 10 x 4.7 Slow Flyer (included); Xoar 10 x 6
• Radio system: Spektrum DX6 six-channel 2.4 GHz transmitter; Spektrum AR400 four-channel 2.4 GHz receiver
• Servos: Four Hitec HS-65HB+ nano-Karbonite micro servos (included)
• Ready-to-fly weight: 19 ounces
• Flight duration: 5 to 7 minutes


Pluses

• Lightweight, rigid, and durable Elapor foam.
• Low wing loading allows for slow, stable maneuverability.
• Impressive high-energy tumbling.
• Excellent performance with included power kit.


Minus

• Noticeable slop at servo horns because of use of Z-bends.


Product Review

Based in Germany, Multiplex has been an industry leader in the world of RC flight with a wide range of aircraft.

Designed by German indoor aerobatics champion, Martin Muller, the original ParkMaster 3D was released more than seven years ago to great success.

The ParkMaster quickly gained the respect and admiration of RC pilots from around the globe. Nearly eight years later, Multiplex is looking to expand on its previous success with the minimally (although expertly) redesigned ParkMaster Pro.

Although the ParkMaster Pro shares much with its predecessor, there are some important improvements. Utilizing carbon-fiber upgrades shaves precious weight while increasing strength, resulting in a lighter, more rigid airframe. In the world of foam profile 3-D airplanes, a small reduction can represent a significant drop in wing loading—that magical number that determines much of how well a 3-D airplane performs.

To increase performance, Multiplex has released an upgraded power package with a higher-rpm version of the trusted Himax 2816 brushless outrunner (1,220 Kv versus 890). With a redesigned motor mount that can accept an even larger motor (as well as allow a wide range of thrust-angle adjustments), Multiplex has invited pilots to explore the limits of the ParkMaster Pro’s extremely rigid airframe. In other words, the new ParkMaster Pro is lighter, stronger, and more powerful.




The upgraded Himax 1,220 Kv motor provides plenty of power for aggressive 3-D maneuvers and unlimited vertical performance.


It’s also better looking. With a completely redesigned graphics package, the ParkMaster Pro makes much more of a statement than its predecessor, and its design is modern and aggressive. Because maintaining visual orientation is a priority when flying 3-D, the airplane’s upgraded look is easy to see at a distance and when transitioning from one orientation to another. Slightly shy of 40 inches long, with a wingspan a little more than 38 inches, the ParkMaster Pro has an impressive wing area of 450 square inches.

A weight of less than 19 ounces results in a wing loading of approximately 5.9 ounces per square foot—that’s low. The airplane is floaty and capable of stable, post-stall flight, without giving up much in the area of tracking and precision. And when it comes to violent tumbles—forget about it!

Like many Multiplex models, the ParkMaster Pro comes in two versions: Kit and Kit-Plus. The former is only the airframe and requires the builder to supply a motor, ESC, servos, and propeller. The latter provides the airframe along with a set of exhaustively tested components.

The ParkMaster Pro shares many attributes with traditional, profile 3-D airplanes with its low wingloading and slow, floaty flight characteristics, minimal structure, and ease of repair, but there are some important differences.

Many airplanes in this category are constructed of either EPP or Depron foam. The ParkMaster Pro utilizes a single-piece fuselage made from Multiplex’s popular Elapor foam—a proprietary foam blend that is lightweight, stiff, and easy to repair.


Construction

If you’ve never built a Multiplex kit before, you are in for a treat. The quality of the parts and the clarity of the instruction manual make the build process as pain-free as possible. As is the case with most quality manufacturers, Multiplex packs its airplanes mindfully. The ParkMaster Pro arrived in a box with its parts wrapped and separated to keep pieces damage free during their journey.

After removing and identifying each piece and checking each control surface for warp, I could not find a single thing to complain about. Should you find that a piece has developed a warp, one of the benefits of Elapor foam is its ability to retain its original shape. Simply bend it gently back slightly past neutral, and it will straighten itself out.

Multiplex formats its manuals so it is easy to remove the illustrations so they can be laid out next to the text to provide visual context and guidance during assembly. The clear, straightforward text and images leave little room for confusion.

Here are a few recommendations for the building process:

To achieve the full visual effect of the ParkMaster Pro’s newly designed look, Multiplex recommends painting the faux canopy area black. When painting foam it’s important to use many thin coats because the solvent in paints can damage your airplane if applied too heavily.

Multiplex recommends Zacki Elapor glue. This medium CA glue doesn’t require the use of an accelerant or kicker. Although Zacki adhesive might be preferable, it’s only available in Europe, so any medium CA glue will work. Scuffing the foam surfaces with 300-grit sandpaper before gluing will help with adhesion, as will pilot holes made with a toothpick, allowing the glue to anchor.

Although the ParkMaster Pro uses easily adjustable quick-connects at the control surface horns, they were not utilized at the servo horns. Instead, a Z-bend is used and, with the small gauge of the control rods, there is noticeable slop present. A little slop won’t hurt, but ultimately an airframe is only as good as its control linkages, and taking the time to reduce that slop will pay off with a cleaner-flying airplane.

A common approach is to put a thin coat of oil on the Z-bend, insert it into the horn, and then apply a small drop of CA glue into the hole. When cured, you have a tighter fit with reduced slop that you can still “break” free, if needed.

Because the ParkMaster Pro is designed for aggressive 3-D tumbling, the main wing must be extremely rigid. This requires a specific process of gluing in the spars where the wing is preloaded, increasing strength and rigidity. Take care to precisely follow these steps because nothing will ruin your day faster than showing off to your friends with a full-throttle blender, only to see your airplane’s wing do the “backward clap.”

Absent from the ParkMaster Pro is a steerable tail wheel or skid. Because the ParkMaster Pro will often be flown off of grass or hand launched, the foam on the bottom of the rear fuselage and rudder should hold up. There are countless do-it-yourself approaches to protecting your shiny new ParkMaster Pro should you find yourself taxiing across a parking lot or other rough surface.

One of the simplest—and perhaps lightest—options is to cut a piece of a zip tie (the 8- to 10-inch ones are thick enough), fold it to create a nickel- or quarter-size loop, and hot glue or CA glue it in place slightly forward of the rudder. The ParkMaster Pro’s massive rudder allows for easy ground steering, with the zip-tie loop sliding frictionless along any surface.




The wheel pants are designed to allow the airplane to take off and land on grass without nosing over. The carbon-fiber landing gear has foam fairings.


Throughout the airframe, Multiplex has provided servo lead grooves that facilitate the building process, but also enhance the clean, tight look of the airplane. The rudder, elevator, ailerons, and ESC all have their own lane on the freeway of wires, making their way to the centrally located receiver slot.

Discussing ESCs, Multiplex doesn’t merely give you a strip of Velcro to slap against the side of the fuselage (like many other profile foamies). The provided slot for the ESC positions it securely within the airframe and flush with the fuselage, eliminating drag while maximizing airflow over the heatsink.




The Hitec ESC fits neatly in the slot in the fuselage and keeps it flush, providing good airflow for cooling.


The battery and servo leads exit and are guided to the receiver and battery locations, respectively. These finishing touches are another way that the ParkMaster Pro and Multiplex stand out.

For many builders, the application of graphics is a final step with almost sacred importance. This process can transform your recently completed airplane from monotone white to a multicolored, electron-breathing, gravity-mocking machine.

You will find two sheets of stylized decals included. No cutting is necessary—simply peel and stick.

The sticker sheets are laid out by location, which helps keep their application clean and organized. The designs appear to have more in common with alien weaponry from a big-budget movie, curving and slashing their way across the stark, white backdrop. In terms of the ParkMaster Pro’s graphics package, I have yet to find its equal.


Flying

Late fall weather is not ideal for testing a small 3-D airplane—or so I thought. After spending some time with the ParkMaster Pro, I’ve placed it high on my list of must-have winter airplanes—as well as spring, summer, and fall. Its compact size, durable construction, inexpensive batteries, and wide flight envelope make it perfect for tossing in the backseat with a handful of batteries and going to a park or school for some wild shenanigans. Start the fun with some controlled, stable, precise flying then flip that switch to high rates for some wickedness.

During the initial flight testing, I utilized a range of batteries and propellers to get a sense of the ParkMaster Pro’s comfort zone. Although Multiplex recommends a three-cell 950 mAh LiPo battery and a 10 x 4.7 propeller, I began with a shiny new Xoar Beechwood 10 x 6 propeller and a slightly larger 1,300 mAh LiPo battery.

The ParkMaster Pro’s battery slot allows for several battery sizes (after the central foam block is removed), and with the 1,300 mAh battery all the way toward the slot’s rear, the airplane balanced right around the front of the recommended 110mm to 120mm center of gravity (CG) range. Launching the ParkMaster Pro can be accomplished however you’d like, although this is an airplane that excels at Short Takeoff & Landing (STOL). A quick burst of throttle and the model is airborne before you can say, “Hey, check this out.” Of course, with the massive canopy area sitting there like a handle, hand launching the ParkMaster Pro is an attractive option.

With the throttle at roughly 50%, I released the ParkMaster Pro into the gentle wind and began making minor trim adjustments. Little trim was required, and I quickly settled in to appreciate the airplane’s tracking and sport mannerisms. With its shorter tail moment, the ParkMaster Pro’s pitch authority is intense, and sport flying on higher rates is not recommended. With the elevator set to 40%, ailerons to 50%, and rudder to 70% (all with moderate exponential), the ParkMaster Pro felt docile and seemed willing to spend the day carving clean holes in the sky.

With massive control surfaces, it seemed likely that the ParkMaster Pro would respond quickly in the air, but I had no idea it would be that responsive. With its huge rudder extending above and below its elevator, the ParkMaster Pro has startling yaw authority. Combining that rudder with a significant side area makes flying the ParkMaster Pro in knife-edge flight a no-brainer.

With the heavier-than-intended battery, the airplane was slightly nose-heavy, requiring a little more down-elevator during inverted flight than I would have preferred, so I programmed in a knife-edge mix to reduce the rudder-to-elevator coupling.

I adjusted battery position and used lighter-weight batteries, so I was able to achieve a more neutral CG, and the coupling was reduced.




The ParkMaster Pro has stability for low-and-slow maneuvers. It’s stable in post stall, allowing for low hovers and tail touching if you dare.


Because the contrast between its top and bottom is so stark, and its knife-edge mannerisms so pleasing, I found myself flying repeated knife-edge patterns, with quick rolls alternately providing me and the growing crowd of drooling fliers behind me views of the ParkMaster Pro’s front and backside.

In preparation for 3-D flight, I used a slightly smaller 3S 850 mAh LiPo battery along with an APC 10 x 4.7 Slow Flyer propeller. The combination of a lighterweight battery and the higher thrust from the Slow Flyer’s wide, low-pitched blades resulted in awe-inspiring punch-outs and an increase in post-stall stability. The ParkMaster Pro’s low, slow capabilities really shined.

Hovers were surprisingly stable and torque rolls could be started and stopped at will. Harriers (particularly inverted) are stable and invite ever-lower passes. With most lightweight, profile 3-D airplanes, low wing loading comes at a cost. Many of the more popular—and violent—3-D maneuvers require inertia, which can be accomplished through higher speeds or with a heavier airplane.

Because this class of airplane is designed to be stable and controllable at a low airspeed, an increase of weight is self defeating. This leaves speed as the mechanism through which a pilot can get his or her airplane twisted in knots. Although the ParkMaster Pro is reasonably fast for its type, what really makes it stand out is how quick it is. The high power-to-weight ratio allows a pilot to sling the ParkMaster Pro into maneuvers.

Many airplanes in this class can perform well during high-energy tumbling—build some speed, mash the sticks, and see what happens. That’s all good, but most experienced pilots are looking for more than a one-dimensional airplane.

The ParkMaster Pro distinguishes itself is in its ability to transition smoothly from precision and sport flight, to low-and-slow hovers and Harriers, and finally on to high-energy, high-inertia maneuvers. Not only does the ParkMaster Pro have a wide flight envelope, there is a crispness that makes these transitions more inviting.


Conclusion

Although no airplane is perfect, occasionally one will come along that sets the bar high within its category. The newly redesigned ParkMaster Pro from the perfectionists at Multiplex is such an airplane.

For a reasonable cost, it can assist pilots wanting to transition into aggressive aerobatics, provide intermediate pilots a platform within which to increase their 3-D repertoire, and offer advanced pilots a small, durable airplane with which to try out new moves before subjecting their larger, more-expensive airplanes to the limits of their imagination.

Analysis aside, this airplane is just all kinds of fun!

—Josh Bernstein
joshbernstein2@yahoo.com


Bonus video


Manufacturer/Distributor:

Hitec/Multiplex
(858) 748-6948
www.hitecrcd.com


Sources:

Maxx Products International
(847) 438-2233
www.maxxprod.com

HobbyKing
www.hobbyking.com

APC Propellers
(530) 661-0399
www.apcprop.com

Xoar Propellers
www.xoarintl.com/rc-propellers

Spektrum
(800) 338-4639
www.spektrumrc.com




Horizon Hobby Hangar 9 P-51 Mustang S 8cc BNF Gas Trainer

$
0
0


Written by Andrew Griffith
A gas-powered warbird trainer
Abridged product review
Photos by Adam Strong
Read the full product review in the March 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Specifications:

• Model type: Semiscale warbird trainer
• Skill level: Beginner (with help) to advanced
• Wingspan: 54.7 inches
• Wing area: 574 square inches
• Wing loading: 22 ounces per square foot
• Wing cube loading: 11
• Airfoil: Semisymmetrical
• Length: 47.7 inches
• Weight: 5 pounds, 8 ounces
• Engine: Evolution 8cc gas engine (installed)
• Radio: Six-channel
• Construction: Laser-cut balsa and light plywood
• Covering/finish: UltraCote covered in the 334th Fighter Group scheme
• Street price: $399.99


Test-model Details

• Engine used: Evolution 8cc gas engine (installed)
• Receiver battery: E-flite 2S 8.4-volt 1,250 mAh 20C LiPo (installed)
• Propeller: 12 x 6 sport
• Radio system: Spektrum DX18 G2; four 37-gram E-flite HV Digital servos (installed); AR636 SAFE receiver (installed)
• Ready-to-fly weight: 5 pounds, 8 ounces
• Flight duration: 20-plus minutes


Pluses

• Warbird looks with mild-mannered sport airplane flying characteristics.
• Preinstalled 8cc Evolution gas engine.
• SAFE technology with panic recovery integrated in factory-installed receiver.
• Spirted flight performance for experienced pilots.
• Wide landing gear stance for excellent ground handling.


Minus

• Throttle pushrod needed adjustment.


Abridged Product Review

Nary has a month gone by without a first-time RC pilot either asking about learning how to fly a P-51 Mustang or actually showing up at my club field with one, or a similar aircraft, asking for lessons. Disappointment sets in when the pilot realizes that he or she will have to start with a boxy-looking high-wing trainer that he or she will quickly outgrow.

A few years ago, Hangar 9 filled a hole in the market by introducing what was known at the time as Progressive Trainer System (PTS) airplanes. The company added high-lift devices to the wingtips, as well as flaps to models such as the F-22 Raptor and the P-51 Mustang. These aircraft allowed a new modeler to get into the air with something sportier, with the help of an instructor.

These models could fly slowly and land well, and as a pilot progressed in his or her training, the devices could be removed to make them capable of more spirited performance. When combined with a simulator and a good instructor, the PTS models allowed pilots to fly solo with fighter airplanes, which is what many people envision when they get into RC airplanes.

The combination is something often avoided by first-time modelers: a tail-dragger, a fighter airplane, and a gas engine. Much of the work is done for you, and with minimal assembly, you will quickly be at the field with your new Mustang, ready to do some flight training or to escort bombers deep into enemy territory.




The servos, AS3X receiver, battery, and fuel tank are all preinstalled—making the assembly quick.





The simple, durable wire landing gear makes things less complicated for beginners.


Flying

I mixed some ethanol-free gas with Red Line two-stroke oil. The Evolution engine calls for a 20:1 ratio, which is twice what I normally run, and I had to employ a different gas can.

The engine refused to fire until the throttle stick was at approximately half throttle, so I performed the fix as detailed in the construction section of this article. When the throttle pushrod was squared away, the engine ran nicely on the bench and didn’t need any tuning. After a few minutes, I headed out for my first flight.


Beginner Mode

Despite how aggressively you move the control stick, the airplane will only achieve a bank angle of approximately 25° or so. It will climb slightly, but even at full down-elevator it barely descends unless you chop the throttle.

I found it difficult to fly in this mode. The turn radius required to get the Mustang to come back is quite wide. If you let go of the stick, the airplane levels out and does a slight climb. Someone trying to get the hang of the perceived control reversal needs to merely let go and the airplane will right itself until he or she can regain control.


Intermediate Mode

This felt more comfortable, and as an instructor, this would likely be the mode in which I would encourage my students to start out flying. Banking is limited to roughly 45° with more elevator authority.

It still doesn’t allow inverted flight, but control response felt better and the turn radius was improved. Stabilization, even in the wind, felt good and the SAFE system could inspire confidence in a new pilot.


Advanced Mode

Although stabilization is still active in advanced mode, the SAFE system allows the pilot to have full control. Loops, rolls, and inverted flight are all possible. Full-throttle passes are fairly quick and, as a sport airplane, this is a lot of fun.

I noticed some oscillation in the ailerons when flying at full speed, which indicates too much gyro gain. I downloaded the AS3X app to my smartphone and ordered a cable to allow me to reduce the gain on each axis. Dropping the gain by 5% on the aileron axis took care of the issue.


Panic Recovery

I took the Mustang up high enough that I had enough room for a mistake from the gyro and a mistake by me. The instructions indicate that sufficient altitude is needed to allow the airplane to recover.

No matter what attitude I had the Mustang in—upside down, straight up, straight down, or in a spin—as soon as I released the controls and pressed the panic button, the airplane leveled off and started a slight climb. This will give pilots enough time to take a breath if they get in trouble, and allow them to settle down and start flying again.

Landing is easily accomplished by using a small amount of power and flying the Mustang until the main wheels touch down. The gyro keeps the airplane steady on final approach, even with some wind.




The landing gear’s wide stance and forward rake make ground handling for the Hangar 9 P-51 Mustang a breeze.


Conclusion

Many people want to learn how to fly a warbird and Hangar 9 gives them that chance. Keep in mind that the P-51 Mustang S 8cc BNF is designed to be used in conjunction with an instructor. The SAFE system gives a beginner pilot confidence—knowing that a helping hand is merely a press of a button away as long as there is sufficient altitude in which to recover.

The Mustang S will grow with a student as his or her confidence increases, and the pilot can change how much he or she controls the aircraft with the flip of a flight-mode switch. It’s more than a trainer—it’s a capable and fun sport airplane that will move along well, perform aerobatics typical of its design, and look pretty darn good while doing it.
—Andrew Griffith
andy@customcutgraphix.com


Bonus video


Manufacturer/Distributor:

Hangar 9
(800) 338-4639
www.hangar-9.com

Horizon Hobby
(800) 338-4639
www.horizonhobby.com


Sources:

Spektrum
(800) 338-4639
www.spektrumrc.com

Red Line Oil
(800) 624-7958
www.redlineoil.com

Frank Tiano Enterprises
(863) 607-6611
www.franktiano.com




Horizon Hobby E-flite Carbon-Z T-28 BNF Basic

$
0
0


Written by Troy Hamm and Ryan Ramsey
This gentle-flying warbird provides lots of fun
Abridged product review
Photos by Ryan Ramsey and Bernie Nosal
Read the full product review in the March 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Specifications:

• Model type: Semiscale foam ARF
• Skill level: Intermediate
• Wingspan: 78 inches
• Wing area: 1,073 square inches
• Length: 63 inches
• Ready-to-fly weight: 12 pounds
• Power system: 60-size 500 Kv BL outrunner; E-flite 70-amp Pro brushless ESC; E-flite two-blade 14.75 x 10 propeller (all included)
• Radio: Spektrum six-channel AR636A DSMX receiver with seven metal-gear servos (installed)
• Construction: Z-Foam
• Needed to complete: Six-channel Spektrum transmitter; E-flite 6S 22.2-volt 3,500 to 5,000 mAh LiPo battery pack
• Price: BNF Basic $569.99; PNP $519.99
• Flight duration: Approximately 8 minutes with 5,000 mAh battery


Pluses

• Fast assembly.
• Excellent manual and instructions.
• Durable foam construction.
• Great flight characteristics.
• Electric retractable tricycle landing gear.


Minus

• Flap hinges might need reinforcement.


Product Review

The North American Aviation T-28 Trojan prototype flew for the first time in 1949. The T-28 was designed to replace the aging North American T-6 Texan as the military’s basic trainer.

The T-28 was a large aircraft that stood more than 12 feet tall and weighed roughly 8,000 pounds. Approximately 2,000 T-28s were built in several variations, with radial engines ranging from 800 to 1,425 hp.

I have always been a fan of the T-28, so when E-flite released its 78-inch Carbon-Z T-28, I had to have one. The airplane is available in two versions: Plug-N-Play (PNP), which does not include a receiver, and the Bind-N-Fly (BNF), which includes a Spektrum AR636A receiver with AS3X three-axis stabilization.

The airplane arrived in one large box. It was well protected and in perfect condition. The airframe is constructed with E-flite’s Carbon-Z technology, which features a combination of plywood, carbon fiber, and Z-Foam that produces a lightweight, durable, and rigid airframe.




The BNF Basic model includes a preinstalled AR636A DSMX receiver.





The included 60-size 500 Kv BL outrunner motor is paired with an E-flite 70-amp Pro brushless ESC that provides good power and a flight duration of approximately 8 minutes with a 5,000 mAh battery.



Ryan’s Flight Report

Flying this gentle giant is an awesome experience. I love the locked-in feel the AS3X system gives to the flight character of this Carbon-Z T-28. It is breathtaking to watch this airplane fly. It has a presence that is unmatched.

Weighing 12 pounds with a 78-inch wingspan, and having no bad habits, are testaments to its Carbon-Z design.

This Trojan performs well throughout its flight envelope. On one hand, it can slow to a crawl for that sweet landing, and on the other, it can come roaring by and pull impressive vertical. This Carbon-Z has it all!

Transporting it is no chore. Simply remove the four bolts that hold the wing on, unplug a few servo leads, and you are on your way to the next Carbon Z T-28 air show.

Every now and then, a model comes along that cannot be resisted. This is one of those models. Great work Horizon Hobby. I can’t wait for the next one!




The flaps slow the T-28 to a crawl. The mechanical retracts operate in a scalelike manner, taking more than 4 seconds to retract.



Troy’s Flight Report

When we reached the flying field, the airplane was given a range check and a preflight inspection. The T-28 tracked straight on takeoff and was airborne from the grass runway in less than 150 feet. No rudder or aileron trim was needed, but it was slightly nose-heavy and required a few clicks of up-trim. On subsequent flights, the batteries were moved back a couple of inches and then the Trojan required no elevator trim.

The T-28 is more aerobatic than expected. Aileron rolls were axial and when the center of gravity was correctly set, it only required a small amount of forward stick to maintain inverted flight. The Trojan is stable at all speeds and handles wind well.

It landed slowly without the flaps and came in at a crawl when the flaps were deployed. The mechanical retracts have worked flawlessly and are very scalelike, taking more than 4 seconds to retract.

The manual recommends removing the gear doors if the airplane is flown off of a tall grass field. I fly off of a grass runway and have flown it both with and without the gear doors with good results. The Trojan is a joy to fly. It looks and flies in a scalelike manner.




The mechanical retracts have held up well flying from grass, and the steerable nose wheel makes ground handling a breeze.



Conclusion

The Carbon-Z T-28 is easy to assemble and fun to fly. Even performing the modifications added less than an hour to the assembly time. I would recommend it to any modeler looking for a warbird that is easy to build and fly.

The Trojan is also a good value when you consider all of the components that are included.

—Troy Hamm
kc3drc@gmail.com
—Ryan Ramsey
rcairtrainingcommand1@gmail.com


Bonus video


Manufacturer/Distributor:

Horizon Hobby
(800) 338-4639

www.e-fliterc.com


Sources:

Spektrum
(800) 338-4639
www.spektrumrc.com

MrRCSound
www.mrrcsound.com




Flyzone A6M2 Japanese Zero Select Scale Rx-R

$
0
0


Written by Terry Dunn
A friendly foam-constructed warbird
Product review
Photos by the author
As seen in the March 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Specifications

• Model type: Semiscale warbird
• Skill level: Intermediate
• Wingspan: 45.1 inches
• Wing area: 307 square inches
• Length: 37 inches
• Radio: Tactic TTX850 2.4 GHz transmitter; Tactic TR825 receiver (in lieu of the included TR624); six micro servos (included)
• Components needed to complete: 6+-channel SLT-compatible transmitter and basic assembly tools
• Price: $229.98 Rx-R (receiver-ready); $319.98 RTF
• Power system (included): 1,000 kV outrunner brushless motor; GWS 10 x 6 x 3 propeller; 40-amp ESC


Test-model Details

(With ElectriFly 3S 2,200 mAh 30C LiPo battery)

• Power output: 22.8 amps, 261 watts
• Flying weight: 37.7 ounces
• Flight time: 8 minutes
• Wing loading: 17.7 ounces per square foot

(With FlightPower 4S 2,450 mAh 30C LiPo battery)
• Power output: 32.4 amps, 491 watts
• Flying weight: 40.7 ounces
• Flight time: 6 minutes
• Wing loading: 19.1 ounces per square foot


Pluses

• Good performance with three-cell or four-cell batteries.
• Accurate scale appearance.
• No stickers.


Minuses

• The Zero is a seven-channel airplane, but includes a six-channel receiver.
• Battery access is somewhat difficult with 2,200 mAh batteries.


Product Review

The A6M2 Zero is the third warbird in Flyzone’s lineup of “Select Scale” models. Like the FW-190 and Corsair that preceded it, the Zero is a molded-foam airplane that features an accurate scale outline, a brushless power system, and retractable landing gear. This newest model, however, takes things up another notch by including features that enhance its scale appeal, durability, and performance.

In the scale arena, the Zero has several things to admire, such as its painted cockpit and pilot figure. What I like most are the model’s factory-applied insignias. All of the markings are matte-finish waterslide decals. Unlike self-adhesive stickers, the decals conform to the panel lines beneath them and closely match the sheen of the surrounding paint.

The Zero is the first Flyzone model to include electric retracts. This setup is simpler and more durable than the servo-driven mechanical retracts seen on other models. These units have worked flawlessly so far, and I expect that they will continue to do so for a long time.

The stock power system on the Zero can accept 3S or 4S LiPo batteries. You don’t even have to change the propeller to use either battery. This is a unique capability, and one that gives the Zero a wide performance range.


Assembly

The Zero is an ARF with little assembly required. It even has a receiver that can be linked to a transmitter using SLT protocol (found on Tactic and some Hitec radios). Mine was ready to fly within a few hours of opening the box. The kit included a printed manual as well as an addendum with various updates and corrections.




The Zero is prefinished and mostly prebuilt at the factory. Mine was ready to fly after one evening of assembly work.



The Zero includes stout electric retracts that work well and require no setup.



The stock brushless power system can be used with three-cell or four-cell LiPo batteries. This gives the Zero a wide performance range.


A single screw is used to attach the tail feathers to the fuselage. I was impressed with how well the molded-foam components fit together. The completed assembly feels solid and has no visible gaps.

When configuring the flaps on the Zero, having too much servo throw could damage the servo or control linkages. Using the “Travel” menu on my Tactic TTX850 radio, I set the end points for the flap servo at 10% in both directions. I then gradually increased these values until I achieved the desired flap deployment. I couldn’t quite get the flaps to sit flush with the wing when they retracted, but the difference is hardly noticeable.

A neat feature of the Zero is that it includes a simple bomb-release mechanism and a dummy bomb. The only problem is that once you tally up the flight controls, retracts, flaps, and the bomb release, you need seven channels to operate everything. The Tactic TR624 receiver that is included with the Zero has only six channels, so you have to choose between flaps or the bomb release. The manual provides an option to use a Y harness to combine the flaps and bomb release, but to avoid this dilemma, I replaced the TR624 with a Tactic TR825 eight-channel receiver and paired it with the Tactic TTX850 eight-channel transmitter previously mentioned.

The magnetically attached canopy lifts off to access the radio and battery compartments. There is plenty of room inside for all of the necessary equipment. Because of all of the model’s servos and other gadgets (did I mention the LED lights in the wingtips and tail?), there are several wires routed to the receiver. Invest a few minutes in tidying the wires and keep this area neat.




The eight-channel Tactic TR825 receiver fits in place of the stock TR624 receiver and allows all functions of the model to be utilized.



There is plenty of room in the radio bay for all of the required equipment.



With flaps, ailerons, retracts, and lights in the wing, there are many wires to manage. Try to keep them organized and tidy.


I configured the radio per the manual’s suggested control throws for high and low rates. The TTX-850, however, offers triple rates for the control surfaces, so I assigned the lower two rates to the values in the manual. For the highest rate, I set the ailerons, elevator, and rudder to 100%, 100%, and 125% respectively. I also added 35% exponential for every control surface and rate setting.

The kit includes adhesive hook-and-loop tape that goes between the battery and its mount inside the fuselage. There is also a hook-and-loop strap for extra security. When using 2,200 mAh batteries (three-cell or four-cell LiPos), they must be mounted fully forward. This places the battery ahead of the anchor point for the strap. The good news is that the battery stays in place without the strap.

With the battery placed all the way forward, it can be difficult to access for removal. I followed the lead of my club mate, Scott Grissman, and created a small tray that makes it easier to install and remove the battery. One side of the tray has hook-and-loop tape to adhere the battery. The opposite side has hook-and-loop material for mounting the tray into the fuselage.

Scott used 1/8-inch plywood for his tray, but mine is made from sheet Kydex plastic. The material type isn’t important. Make sure you have the tray roughly an inch longer than the battery to provide a convenient handle.




I made a simple battery tray to streamline the job of swapping out 2,200 mAh batteries.


Even with my ElectriFly 3S 2,200 mAh LiPo battery placed all the way forward, I had to add 1/2 ounce of lead in the nose to achieve the suggested CG. The foam cowling has a molded-in chin scoop that snugly holds two 1/4-ounce weights. I also used a FlightPower 4S 2,450 mAh LiPo to power the Zero. The nose weight was unnecessary with this heavier battery. I also found that the longer FlightPower battery negated the need for my battery tray.

With the three-cell battery, my Zero was comfortably within the suggested weight range for this model. Even with the four-cell battery, it was slightly outside of this range. Both batteries posted encouraging values for the wing loading and power loading, so I departed for the maiden flight full of confidence.


Flying the Zero

With a wide landing gear stance and steerable tail wheel, the Zero is stable on the ground. If there is much wind, the model tries to weathervane and you may not have enough steering authority with the tail wheel to taxi crosswind.

The Zero requires rudder correction to track straight as you begin the takeoff roll. I found this easy to manage when I gradually increase the throttle.

An interesting thing I discovered while flight testing the Zero is that it has two personas—both are fun, but in different ways. With a three-cell 2,200 mAh battery, it is a well-mannered sport aircraft that is suitable for flying at small fields. It feels light on the wing and changes direction quickly without snapping or stalling. It behaves more like an aerobatic Sunday flyer than a warbird.

With the added power and mass of a four-cell battery, the Zero takes on a more aggressive demeanor. Top speed and climb rate are both much higher. The airplane also seems to track more solidly at these high speeds. This is the battery to use when you want to fly low, strafing passes over the runway while making fake machine gun sounds.

Because no changes are required to use either the three-cell or four-cell battery, you can readily show either side of the Zero’s split personality. Choose the battery that suits your mood.




The Zero is a great slow-speed flyer so it lands easily, with or without the flaps deployed.


The Zero is capable of all four-channel aerobatics with either battery. The four-cell option allows climbing maneuvers such as hammerheads and loops to be much bigger. High-speed snap maneuvers are especially fun. I’m still working on getting my snaps with this airplane to only one rotation. I tend to overshoot.

The one maneuver that requires special attention is knife-edge. The airplane has almost enough rudder authority with the suggested rates to hold knife-edge at full throttle. Upping the throw to my 125% super-high rate provides the additional leverage it needs, but there is a little pitch coupling toward the canopy. If you only want to make long, banked photo passes over the runway, the stock rudder throws are fine.

I’ve found that the suggested throws for elevator and aileron suit my tastes well. In fact, I leave both in the high-rate settings for most of my flights. My 100% throw high rates are only useful when I want to get crazy with this model.

The bomb drop is a fun thing to do. It’s too bad that the pilot doesn’t get to watch it fall all the way to the ground! The bomb weighs an ounce and it must create significant drag, but I honestly can’t tell any difference in the airplane’s performance whether it is or isn’t attached.

There is only a small amount of pitch coupling when I drop the flaps. In fact, I have not felt compelled to mix any elevator adjustments with the flaps. I merely make sure that I’m at a moderate speed when I take the flaps to the first notch, and then get settled before dropping them further. The flaps aren’t necessary for landing the Zero, but they can be helpful for making short-field landings on windless days.

With or without the flaps, the Zero slows down well for landing. Sometimes I’m amazed by how slowly it will fly without stalling. The landing gear is stiff, so it can be challenging to settle onto a paved runway without any bounce. Maintaining a few clicks of throttle all the way to touchdown helps.


Conclusion

The Zero has become my favorite of the Flyzone warbirds. The fit and finish of this model are excellent, while the electric retracts and three-cell or four-cell power options make it user-friendly.

I also find that the Zero is an excellent canvas for experimenting with weathering techniques. I sprayed mine with a coat of flat clear coat and I am gradually adding weathering details with charcoal pencils. The results are encouraging. If you decide to get a Flyzone Zero for yourself, it’s ready for the details that will make it uniquely yours.

—Terry Dunn
terrydunn74@gmail.com


Bonus video


Manufacturer/Distributor:

Hobbico
(800) 637-7660
www.towerhobbies.com


Sources:

Tactic
(800) 637-7660
www.tacticrc.com

FlightPower
(800) 637-7660
www.flightpowerbatteries.com




Third Annual Vintage CL Combat Fly-In

$
0
0


Written by Bob Hunt
Period-accurate CL Combat models gather in New Jersey
Event coverage
Photos by the author
As seen in the March 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


If you were to study the top competitive models in any modeling discipline, you’d discover that they were developed and honed over the years to be finely tuned instruments that are capable of producing amazing performances. You’d also probably note that most of the designs for a specific discipline are similar in appearance. Long-term, focused development of any type of model generally yields a homogenous result. In other words—what works, works!

If you look back to the early days of development of a specific model type, you’d see that many avenues were tried in an effort to improve the breed. Some of the early ideas had merit and worked well, and some were blatant failures, but at each stage of development, the good traits were incorporated into the next generation’s designs, while less successful ideas were discarded.

Still, it was just that “cut and try” process that produced some memorable model designs. Early design pioneers had no hard-and-fast rules, they simply tried whatever came into their minds. The result was a generation or two of original-looking, memorable designs.

This process is most evident in early Control Line (CL) Combat model development. From the early 1950s through the late 1960s, there was a bonanza of original-looking models. Interestingly, many of the design aspects of certain early Combat models are identifiable in some of today’s advanced competition aircraft.

In 2013, two lifetime CL enthusiasts from New Jersey, Tom Hampshire and Tom Schafer, decided to organize a Vintage CL Combat fun-fly event. Their hope was to attract six or eight local fliers and have them show up with their favorite Vintage Combat models. Well, they attracted 50 fliers and models that first year!

The event was a joint venture of the Garden State Circle Burners (GSCB) CL club and the Middlesex Modelers. It was held at the GSCB club’s field in Lincoln Park, New Jersey. The event was so successful that they held another equally successful fly-in in 2014 and a third in 2015.

On September 20, the 2015 version of the Vintage Combat Fly-In, directed by Tom Schafer, drew approximately 50 participants—spectators and fliers—with one coming from Oklahoma to attend. Andre Ming had read about the fly-in on the Stunt Hangar Internet forum and decided that he had to make the trip! There were more than 50 models on the field last year, and they ran the gamut from a 1952 vintage Ringmaster to early 1970s twin-boom aircraft.




Here are a few of the many participants and models seen at the third annual Vintage Combat Fly-In. The event is cosponsored by the GSCB and the Middlesex Modelers, and was held at the GSCB field in Lincoln Park NJ.


The whole idea of this event is to come with your favorite-design Combat model and enjoy flying, exhibiting, or simply visiting. There were no matches scheduled, although a few impromptu ones were flown on the back circle at the GSCB field with no casualties.

One fun event at the fly-in was the Larry Scarinzi Top Speed Challenge. Larry is known for his many exceedingly fast CL Combat models (see the sidebar), and sponsors an unofficial top speed event at the fly-in. The prize is an autographed picture of Larry holding his famous Super Satan.

The 2015 winner was Tom Schafer. Tom flew his Riley Wooten-designed VooDoo that is powered by a Fox .36X BB and fitted with a custom-made Brian Gardner ABC piston and liner set. Tom posted a speed of 125 mph for the win. Close behind at 123.5 mph was Al Ferraro flying his Larry Scarinzi-designed Super Satan, featuring the same motor setup as Tom’s winning entry.

Placing third was Jim Vigani. Jim flew his original-design Double Diamond to a credible 118 mph. Jim must have had too much fuel in his aircraft because after it was officially timed, it kept running for what seemed like several minutes. He managed to keep it flying until the engine quit, but I’ll bet he never again puts that much fuel in it!

There were many Larry Scarinzi designs at the fly-in. I counted no fewer than nine Killers, five Super Satans, two Greased Lightnings, and one each of Larry’s Lethal Blast, Blitz, Sting Ray, Giant Killer, and Werewolf designs. There were also two Bill Netzeband-designed Half Fast flying wings, a Consolidated Wow, a Sterling T-Square, several Riley Wooten-designed Sneakers, VooDoos, Demons, a Top Flite Combat Streak, a Terry Prather-designed Winder, a Veco Renegade, a Sterling Super Swoop, a Midwest Hornet, a Scrambler, and even a magnesium belly-pan-equipped Count Clipper! I’m sure I might have missed a couple of airplane names, but each era was well represented.

Most of the airplanes at the fly-in featured period-accurate engines, construction techniques, materials, covering, and finish (although a few were covered with modern shrink-film material). There were a number of outstanding transparent, silk-covered models that were beautiful to look at.




Tom Schafer is seen here with his Larry Scarinzi-designed Killer and his Bill Netzeband-designed Half Fast flying wing. The Half Fast was timed at 103 mph. That’s not bad for this period-accurate, 1958 Fox Combat Special-powered model!




Jim Vigani designed these two CL Combat models: the 1961 vintage Double Diamond (L) and the 1962 vintage Up’n At’m. Jim placed third in the Larry Scarinzi Speed Challenge with the Double Diamond.




There were nine Larry Scarinzi-designed Killers at the fun-fly. They belonged to (clockwise from L) Tom Hampshire, Tom Luciano, Paul Rizkalla, Tom Schafer, Andre Ming, Larry Scarinzi, and in the center of this circle, Frank Imbriaco.




Here’s a gaggle of Super Satans. In the back row are the designer, Larry Scarinzi (L), and Andre Ming. Tom Luciano, kneeling, displays a tapered-wing Super Satan and a straight-wing version.




Paul Rizkalla (L) fires up the Fox .36X in his Larry Scarinzi-designed Killer, while Frank Imbraco holds the aircraft and prepares to launch. This design was published in the August 1958 issue of Flying Models.


GSCB club president, Ron Testa, made a pizza run at noon so that no one had to leave the fun at the field to get lunch. The hosting GSCB club members went out of their way to ensure that everyone had a great time. And, from all accounts, this was another successful fly-in.

I received the following note from Tom Hampshire about the Vintage Combat Fly-In:

“I have been active in Control Line for about 30 years in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. I thought I pretty much knew everybody who flew CL in this area, but now I find out that’s not the case. About five or six guys that I had never met or even heard of showed up at the fly-in, and they were really knowledgeable about the hobby/sport. They appeared to really enjoy themselves. I was very pleasantly surprised.

“I’d suggest that other regions try this as a way to maybe draw a retread or two out of retirement. It’s a fun day, and unlike a serious contest, the work in putting one on pretty much ends with getting the sanction.”

Join the fun this year. The date for the 2016 Vintage Combat Fly-In has not been set, but you can check the “Contest Calendar” in Model Aviation for that later on this year. The fly-in is typically scheduled for mid-to-late September.

This report is humbly and gratefully dedicated to that great CL Combat flier and Model Aviation columnist, Rich Lopez. Rich’s passing has left a void in the CL Combat world and in the modeling community that can never be filled.

Godspeed, Rich. The matches in heaven just got tougher.

—Bob Hunt
robinhunt@rcn.com


Larry Scarinzi: a CL Icon

For those who are not aware of CL lore, Larry Scarinzi is one of the most prolific designer/builders of top competition Combat and Aerobatics (Stunt) designs in what we now refer to as the Vintage era. Larry produced at least seven notable Combat models that were either published in major modeling magazines or kitted by major manufacturers. He also designed several experimental models that were not published and/or kitted, but had an impact on future Combat model design philosophy.

Larry’s first original-design competition Combat model was the Lethal Blast, and it set standards on the East Coast for speed and maneuverability. It featured a thin, constant-chord wing and a long fuselage. A K&B Torpedo Green Head .35 powered that aircraft as well as his next design, the Greased Lighting.




AMA Model Aviation Hall of Fame member and East Coast modeling icon, Larry Scarinzi, poses with a few of his many CL Combat designs. He’s been at it since the late 1940s, and is still going strong at 82 years young.


Larry admitted that he “borrowed” some of the design parameters for the Greased Lighting from Harold “Red” Rinehardt’s unique Stunt Wing—a model with which Red won the Stunt event at the 1954 New York Mirror Meet.

If you were to compare the overall layout of Larry’s “Greaser” (as it is known in New Jersey) to the modern FAI Combat aircraft of today, you’d be amazed at how similar they are in design. Were Red and Larry really that far ahead of the crowd? Many of us who knew Red, and know Larry still, certainly think so.

Other notable models designed by Larry include the Killer, Giant Killer, Junior Streak, Werewolf, Hatchet, Blitz, and Super Satan. Larry developed engines that produced amazing amounts of power, and with his Blitz and Super Satan series he routinely reached speeds in excess of 120 mph! And, that was back in the 1960s …

Larry is a master at the lost art of silk covering, and most of his Combat models have finishes that rival those on contest Stunt models. Most of Larry’s designs feature 1/2-inch square main spars that extend through the fuselage. The ribs are positioned on the main spar and glued.

Without the strength of the silk covering, these wings would probably not hold up under the flight stresses imposed upon them. Larry’s models were engineered from the beginning to use the silk covering as a structural component. This is not surprising, considering that at one point in his life, Larry was a structural analyst for Lockheed!

One of Larry’s most interesting designs is the Sting Ray, which featured a side-mounted engine fitted with a racing-style helmet cowl, and a swept-forward leading edge wing. This aircraft is reputed to have exceeded 120 mph, and it is still a beautiful airplane.

Larry brought the Sting Ray, and examples of many of his other designs, to the Vintage Combat Fun-Fly. And, he still knows how to fly them at amazing speeds, even at 82 years young.

Larry is truly a modeling icon!

—Bob Hunt


Bonus photos

Third Annual Vintage CL Combat Fly-In


Sources:

Larry Scarinzi’s biography
www.modelaircraft.org/files/scarinzilarry.pdf





Cub-Cake

$
0
0


Would you like to read more about small-field and indoor models?

Check out free content from AMA's Park Pilot magazine - a quarterly publication that inspires, informs, and instructs small-field and indoor aviators!


Written by Tim Bailiff
Turn the AMA Cub into an electric RC model
Construction article
Photos by Maggie Madril
As seen in the full March 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


For as far back as I can remember, my brother Dan and I loved building model airplanes. Each new build was an adventure we truly enjoyed. In the day, there was no such thing as an RTF or an ARF. If we wanted an airplane to fly, we had to build it.

Our town had a terrific hobby shop that was a wonderland of model airplane kits. My only source of money was the weekly allowance my parents gave me, so the price of the model kit was everything.

In 1968, AMA Model Aviation Hall of Fame modeler Frank Ehling designed a simple rubber-powered Free Flight (FF) model that the AMA could use to introduce young newcomers to the hobby. Called the AMA Cub, it had a 121/2-inch wingspan and when the little airplane appeared on our local hobby shop’s shelves, I had to have one. It was inexpensive, simple to build, and capable of some nice flights. My brother and I built a number of these airplanes and had a blast flying them. I’m sure many of you did too.

A friend recently gave me a nice selection of model kits including two AMA Cubs! I hadn’t seen one in years and they got me thinking. The result? By combining this classic little FF model with modern micro RC technology, I converted the AMA Cub into a fun, easy-to-fly RC airplane.

In fact, it handles so nicely, it’s a piece of cake. So, with that in mind, and with a nod to its original name, I offer you the Cub-Cake. Who would have thought this simple little FF aircraft could become a small park flyer? If this sounds like fun to you, then read on!


A Little History

In the April 1967 issue of American Modeler, a little rubber-powered airplane called the Delta Dart appeared. Designed by AMA’s then-technical director Frank Ehling, the Delta Dart was first introduced at the 1966 Nats.

Although some thought the model was too simple and heavy, kids found it easy to build and fly. With pointy wingtips, most of the wing area was closer to the center of the wing, making any warps less problematic.

Sig Manufacturing decided to sell the kit renamed the AMA Racer. When the kit appeared, changes had been made that resulted in a slightly more complicated model. This prompted Frank to design another one called the AMA Cub. This airplane has been used in beginner promotions since 1968 and is considered one of the most-produced model airplanes of all time.

What makes the Cub such a great beginner’s model? Its one-piece motorstick comes with the correct stabilizer incidence built in. The joints used at the tips of the wing, stabilizer, and vertical fin can be imperfect and still be sufficiently strong because the covering reinforces the joints. Finally, with the exception of the motorstick, the AMA Cub is made entirely of 1/8 x 1/16-inch balsa strips, which make it less likely to warp than other lightweight designs.




The AMA Cub kit is available through Sig Manufacturing or the AMA retail Web store.


Let’s Build It

After all these years, I was delighted to see that Sig Manufacturing still sells the AMA Cub kit, as does the AMA online retail Web store. My intention was to keep the Cub-Cake as close to original as possible. To begin, simply build your AMA Cub as described in the instruction sheet that comes with the kit—with a few small changes.

Instead of cutting the wingtips and tail feathers off, allow them to continue out to points. You will understand why when the control surfaces are attached. To do this, you will need to lengthen the strip of balsa that forms the stabilizer’s trailing edge (TE) roughly an inch. As you build, remember to glue the balsa strips to the paper covering. Elmer’s Glue works great for this.

Take a look at the framing photos and add the four additional supports to the tail surfaces as shown. They run front to back. The stabilizer has three supports and the fin has one. You should have plenty of balsa stock remaining in the kit and this will add greatly to the overall strength of your Cub-Cake. The supports should all be glued to the covering as well.




Four additional braces are added to the stabilizer and fin.


Before gluing on the wing and stabilizer, cut a 1/16-inch wedge from the angled underside of the aft fuselage. It should be 4 inches long, measured from the rear of the fuselage, with the widest part of the cut taken from the front. Turn the wedge around and glue it back into place.

This will decrease, but not eliminate, the amount of incidence in the stabilizer. Although required for the rubber-powered AMA Cub, the Cub-Cake doesn’t need that much built-in up-elevator. Now finish by attaching the stabilizer with CA glue or epoxy.

Add a tiny amount of CA to all of your joints. Don’t use too much because it might run and wick onto your covering.




The stabilizer wedge is turned to reduce incidence.


Don’t glue your wing center joints until the wing is being attached to the fuselage. Use 5-minute epoxy in the joints and along the center bottom of the wing, then measure 1/2 inch back from the front of the fuselage and pin your wing into position.

With the airplane sitting upright, set the dihedral by raising each wingtip 21/2 inches. Be sure you have sufficient epoxy in the dihedral joints. Look at the photos to see how I secured the wings as they dried.

You won’t be using the propeller assembly or the rubber, but rather than throw them away, set them aside for a future project.




The wing is pinned and the dihedral set while the epoxy dries.


Control Surfaces

Your Cub-Cake uses rudder and elevator for control. You will find the generous dihedral not only keeps the aircraft stable, but also allows the rudder to be effective. Both control surfaces are made from lightweight 2mm Depron foam.

The rudder is 1 inch wide. After the proper width is cut, simply hold it against the fin’s TE and cut the top of the rudder as shown in the photo. Its shape is basically an extension of the fin’s leading edge (LE), which is the reason the tail feathers are built into points. The rudder’s bottom should be cut up from the fuselage at roughly a 45° angle.

After the 1/2-inch wide elevator is cut to the proper width, hold it against the stabilizer’s TE and cut it following the lines of the stabilizer’s LEs. It will involve two cuts. Finally, bevel each of the control surfaces’ LEs back at a 45° angle. The elevator’s bevel should be on the bottom and the rudder’s bevel on its left.

Using 1/4-inch wide strips of Blenderm tape, hinge the rudder on the right side of the fin and the elevator on the top of the stabilizer. Be sure to leave a slight gap so that the rudder and elevator can move freely.




This details the rudder’s beveled LE.


Plywood Pieces

At this point, fabricate the four small 1/32-inch plywood pieces you will need, using the photos as reference.

The rudder and elevator horns are cut from 1/2-inch pieces of 1/32 plywood, 1/4 inch wide at the base, tapering to 1/8 inch wide at the tip. Sand the bases so that the horns angle slightly forward. Next, round the tips and then drill a tiny .015-inch hole in the center of the rounded ends.

I like to drill a second hole 1/8 inch closer to the base because I like having options. Using the photos as a guide, epoxy the control horns onto the rudder and elevator. The rudder horn goes on the right and the elevator horn on the left. Making a small, shallow slit in the Depron helps ensure a secure attachment.




The rudder and elevator horn locations are shown in this photo.


Fashion a plywood mount for the Spektrum AR6400 receiver unit. This great little receiver/servo unit can be purchased at many hobby shops and online. It is the heart and soul of your Cub-Cake.

The mount is made from 1/32 plywood, cut 3/16-inch wide and 11/4-inch long. Round the tips and then drill a 1/16-inch hole in each. You want them large enough to fit a #0 x 1/4-inch pan-head screw into each. Use 5-minute epoxy to glue the mount to the bottom of the receiver unit. It should run front to back and be in the middle of the circuit board. Take your time and be sure the mount remains straight and level. Do not use CA glue for this. If it wicks into the servos, the unit will be ruined.

The last plywood piece to fashion is the firewall. The HobbyKing AP-03 brushless motor comes with a preattached three-point metal motor mount. Use the mount as a template to shape the triangular firewall slightly larger than the mount itself. When complete, round off the points and use CA to glue the plywood firewall to a 1/8-inch piece of balsa sheet.

After the glue has dried, cut and sand the balsa to match the shape of the plywood firewall. Drill three small pilot holes in the firewall to help mount the motor. You will also need to drill a 1/4-inch hole in the center of it as well as clear the propeller shaft and keeper that protrude from the back of the motor. Be sure it is sufficiently deep.

Use 5-minute epoxy to mount the firewall to the front of the fuselage. Center it as best you can and add a few degrees of down- and right-thrust.


Airborne Electronics

The AR6400 is installed on top and slightly aft of the wing’s LE. In order to clear the dihedral, you will need to build a small 1/8-inch thick balsa standoff. Make it the same shape as the plywood receiver mount including the two holes, but make them smaller because they are pilot holes. Glue the standoff into position as shown in the photos and then mount your receiver unit using two #0 x 1/4-inch pan-head screws.

Carefully connect the motor’s three leads to the tiny HobbyKing 030 ESC. The leads should be pushed through then carefully soldered into the three unmarked contact positions on one edge of the tiny circuit board. As you do this, remember that you might need to swap two of the leads if your motor turns backward. In other words, use the least amount of solder possible. It’s a small space in which to work, but be patient and take your time.

On the opposite edge of the circuit board, solder in the three-wire lead with the nano connector, to the three marked contacts. Typically, the white is the signal wire, red is the positive wire, and the black is the negative wire.

In the photos, you will notice that I use a three-wire lead with different colors. It doesn’t matter as long as you keep track of where each wire is connected. These same wires must plug into the rear-facing ESC jack, on the back of the AR6400, in the correct positions. When looking into the jack, the black negative port is to the left and the red positive port is in the middle, which leaves the white signal port on the right. As an aid, I marked mine with a touch of fingernail polish. Finally, plug it in.

The three-wire lead going to my AR6400 was stripped from a 28-wire ribbon cable I purchased at an electronics store. The three wires lined up perfectly with the AR6400 ESC jack.

As an experiment, I removed roughly 1/8 inch of insulation and tinned each wire with solder. I then carefully trimmed and dressed each wire with a fine file until they were smooth and the correct diameter. Then I simply plugged them directly into the jack. It worked perfectly!




A detailed photo of the AR6400 shows the pushrod and jack connections.


Go ahead and press your GWS EP 3030 propeller onto the motorshaft. If it doesn’t press on easily, hold a small drill bit in your fingers and carefully use it to “file” the hole in the propeller. Be careful not to overdo it.

After the propeller has been installed, mount your motor using three #0 x 1/4-inch pan-head screws. For now you can simply let your ESC hang, but be sure everything is positioned clear of the propeller.


Get With the Program

Okay, now it’s time to bind and program your AR6400. This will allow you to center your servos and test your motor. There are a number of transmitters that use DSM2 or DSMX signaling protocol that would work fine for this project.

I used my Spektrum DX7 transmitter. To bind, follow the instructions on your specific transmitter. Your AR6400 will automatically go into search mode, indicated by a flashing LED, as soon as you plug in the nano-tech 1S LiPo battery. When the LED stops flashing, the bind has been achieved.

Generally, the AR6400 is factory programmed to use its own brushed ESC, so you will likely need to reprogram the ESC jack to allow it to be used with your brushless ESC. This is simple and only takes a few minutes.

To reprogram, start with everything unplugged and turned off. Turn on your transmitter and hold full throttle and full left rudder. While holding that stick position, power up the AR6400. The LED on the receiver will go solid and within 5 seconds it will flash three times before returning to solid, indicating the option is changed. This feature “scrolls,” so if desired, it can be changed back and forth by using the same procedure.

Now, if you want your rudder to work on your right stick, you must go into your transmitter and mix your rudder 100% with your aileron function. This is necessary because both servos on your AR6400 are hardwired to the elevator and rudder channel.

You might need to mix in negative rudder for the servo to move properly. While in your transmitter, go ahead and enter the menu for setting your dual rates as well. Leave your higher setting at 100% and set the lower setting to 60%.

After centering the trim settings on your transmitter, check that the linear servos are centered. Next, check that your motor runs properly. If the propeller spins backward, remove the motor from the firewall and swing it and the ESC away from the airplane. Now carefully reverse two of the motor leads on the ESC as described. Again, be patient and take your time. Be assured, your efforts will be rewarded at the flying field.


Pushrods

It’s time to make your Cub-Cake’s pushrods! They are both made from sections of .030 carbon-fiber rod with a Z-bend of .015 music wire at both ends. Start by cutting two 9-inch carbon-fiber rods. To one end of each rod, secure a 11/2-inch length of Z-bend .015 music wire. The wire should extend roughly 1/2 inch onto the carbon-fiber rod.

Scuffing the wire and carbon-fiber rods ahead of time helps give them “tooth.” When secured with a small amount of medium CA glue, it creates a secure connection. After the glue has dried, connect the pushrods with the Z-bend wire ends to the center hole of both servos.

Now make another set of 11/2-inch Z-bend wires and connect them to the elevator and rudder horns. Secure the control surfaces in the neutral position with painter’s tape.

Using a small amount of CA glue, connect the free end of the carbon-fiber rod to the wires. This can be tricky, so take your time and make sure they are aligned. After you are satisfied with the connections, finish with a little more CA glue.


Landing Gear

My intention was to keep the Cub-Cake as original as possible and use no landing gear, however, seeing how vulnerable the motor and propeller were compelled me to add one. I decided an appropriate compromise would be a single landing strut and wheel, plus a small tail skid. One wheel actually works great because the broad stabilizer keeps the airplane from tipping.

The gear strut is made from a 23/4-inch length of .032 wire. Begin at the top by bending 1/4 inch at a 90° angle. Below that, bend 1/2 inch more at roughly a 70° angle facing forward. Finally, bend a 1/4-inch axle 90° sideways at the bottom of the strut. Take a look at the photos for help.

Now measure back 21/2 inches from the front of the firewall and carefully push the top of the landing gear into the bottom of the fuselage. Press or carve a shallow 1/2-inch trough into the balsa where the horizontal piece of wire touches. Using medium CA glue, fill the trough, and secure the landing gear in place. Finish by placing a 5/8-inch GWS lightweight foam wheel on the axle. I held the wheel on using a small piece of wire insulation and CA glue.




The author added landing gear after seeing how vulnerable the motor and propeller were to possible damage.


For the tail skid, cut a 1/4 x 1/4-inch triangle from a piece of scrap 1/8-inch balsa. Glue it in place using CA. When dry, put a light coat of CA glue on the bottom of the skid to strengthen it. Place two small 1/2-inch pieces of Blenderm tape on the outboard tips of the elevator to protect the foam from scuffing.


Battery Placement

To achieve the proper center of gravity (CG), the 1S LiPo battery must be placed under the left wing on the fuselage. Cut a 1/4-inch hole in the left wing covering slightly behind the AR6400. To ensure that the covering will not rip, reinforce the area with two 3/4-inch square pieces of Blenderm tape, placed on either side of the wing.

By cutting through the tape and covering, you will create a hole where the battery lead can pass and not cause any further damage. The battery can then be moved either forward or back and secured in place with a small 1/2 x 2-inch piece of painter’s tape. My battery was placed slightly behind the receiver unit. The proper CG should be at the wingtips.


Preflight Checklist

It’s time to make your final preflight check. This is a quick process and will help ensure that you have a safe, successful first flight.

With everything plugged in and turned on, check that your controls move in the proper direction. If they don’t, go back into your transmitter and reverse if necessary.

The Cub-Cake is unique in that there is no need to worry about control throws. Simply take what you get. I suggest that you switch your dual rates to the lower setting for your first flight and check one final time that your motor runs properly.

Make sure that your Cub-Cake balances at its wingtips and reposition your battery as required. One last tip: If you must, always go with your model slightly nose-heavy as opposed to tail-heavy!


You Are Cleared for Takeoff

Are you excited? You should be. This is when your work pays off and the real fun begins. Now call the tower and you are ready for takeoff!

On the runway, place your Cub-Cake on the ground facing into the wind. Give it full throttle and in only a few feet, you’ll be airborne. You can easily hand launch your airplane, too.

When in the air, let your Cub-Cake gradually gain altitude, then reduce the power and trim for level flight. Try different throttle settings until you discover the sweet spot and take a minute to get the feel of your new airplane.

The Cub-Cake is easy to fly and still quite maneuverable. When properly trimmed, it will fly hands-free. It’s a great small park flyer. Keep it in close and have fun with its gentle, slow-flying characteristics. That’s what I call relaxing.

Will it fly aerobatics? Sure it will! From level flight, with full throttle, it will loop endlessly. It will also roll.

That’s right! It does great rudder rolls. Just pull the nose up slightly and give it full rudder.

With a little practice and some down-elevator when inverted, you can even pull off a pretty decent roll. How cool is that? Try some stalls as well. The Cub-Cake has no bad habits.




The Cub-Cake has no bad habits and can be flown low and slow and is also capable of loops and rolls.


Bring It Home

When it’s time to land, reduce the throttle and head for home. It’s not a good floater in a dead-stick landing, so plan to save a little battery to carry you in. As you get close to the ground, start the flare and smoothly close the throttle. You will make a beautiful landing.


Final Thoughts

Congratulations on a successful first flight and another addition to your squadron. The Cub-Cake is nice to fly, and the more you fly it, the more you will love it. Try it indoors as well. It is great fun in small spaces.

Encourage your friends and fellow pilots to build one. Think of the fun you will all have as you revisit your youth together. Time in the air is special and doesn’t last long. Enjoy it!

—Tim Bailiff
casurfish@aol.com


Material List

I encourage you to buy what you can from your local hobby shop. If, however, you cannot find something, the Internet is always available.

As with many of my construction articles, this one does not include plans, however it does contain construction photos that are designed to aid in successfully completing the project.

There are a few small items I’ve not listed, but I will cover them as necessary. I suggest you read this entire article before you begin your build. Also, if you first collect your material, your Cub-Cake will almost “fly” off your work bench! Clever, I know.

• 1) AMA Cub kit
• 1) Spektrum AR6400 receiver unit or similar
• 1) HobbyKing AP-03 7,000 Kv brushless motor
• 1) HobbyKing 030 three-amp 1S brushless ESC
• 2) Turnigy nano-tech 160 mAh 1S LiPo batteries
• 1) GWS EP 3030 propeller
• 1) GWS 9/16-inch lightweight foam wheel
• 3) #0 x 1/4-inch pan-head screws
• 2) #0 x 1/8-inch pan-head screws
• 1) Three-conductor male nano-connector with 6-inch wire
• 1) 12 x 6-inch sheet of 2mm Depron
• 1) 18-inch piece of .030 carbon-fiber rod
• 1) 6-inch piece of .032 music wire
• 1) 12-inch piece of .015 music wire
• 1) 2-inch square piece of 1/32 plywood
• 1) 1-inch square piece of 1/8 balsa
• 1) Blenderm medical tape
• 1) Medium CA glue
• 1) 5-minute epoxy


Bonus photos

Cub Cake


Sources:

Sig Manufacturing
(800) 247-5008
www.sigmfg.com

Spektrum
(800) 338-4639
www.spektrumrc.com

HobbyKing
www.hobbyking.com

Turnigy
www.turnigy.com

GWS
(909) 946-7676
www.gws.com

AMA retail Web store
(800) 435-9262
www.modelaircraft.org/shopama

Born to Fly - March 2016

$
0
0


Written by Jim T. Graham
Monthly column with bonus content
Read this column and more in the March 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


2016 RC events

It’s that time of year—time to shake off the cold and plan to head out on the road in search of great RC events.

Although I never look forward to losing the warm weather and flying days, the winter does bring time for me to straighten up my shop and repair airplanes and equipment that I neglected during summer flying days. I also try to find something I have wanted to put together as a project during the winter. That all leads us to spring!

As many of you know, my full-time job is running RCGroups.com. That means that the whole RCGroups crew attends shows across the country during the flying months. This is a great way to see new models that are out, and more importantly, see all of our RC friends! I have to admit that by the time the Southeast Electric Flight Festival (SEFF) in Georgia rolls around, I’m ready to load up the big black truck and spend some time in the sun while driving around in a golf cart. Good times!

Jason Cole also works full time for RCGroups. He usually travels with me, and sometimes attends events by himself. He is into Discus-Launch Gliders (DLG) right now and competes in nearby contests. Matt Gunn attends events in the Ohio area. To top it all off, we have Ashley Meier. She also travels and mainly covers Giant Scale events for RCGroups.

There are many great RC events across the country! I’m willing to bet there is something near you. I have been to large events, such as Joe Nall Week, and smaller local events. The size doesn’t matter—it’s about sharing your love for the hobby with like-minded people.

I thought I would go over some of the gatherings we cover each year, so more pilots can be aware of what’s out there. Here we go!


SEFF

The Southeast Electric Flight Festival (SEFF) will take place April 11-16 this year in Americus, Georgia. This is usually where I get my first taste of summer. If you are into electric-powered flight, this is the place for you! The flightline covers everything from sport flying, to helicopters, to 3-D, FPV, sailplanes, and more!

Mac Hodges shares his RC nirvana, while the Fayette Flyers of Georgia make an event that is difficult to host look easy! I think I have been to SEFF every year since it started. I always look forward to it.




If you’re into electric flight and fun, you should go to SEFF.


Joe Nall Week

Stop. Read. Comprehend. Go to this event! I talk with RC pilots every day and when I meet someone who hasn’t gone to Joe Nall Week at the Triple Tree Aerodrome in Woodruff, South Carolina, I try to make that person understand that he or she must go to this event. I think if you fly RC for more than two years, it should be mandatory that you attend Joe Nall. This year’s gathering will be held May 7-14.

I describe it as the Disneyland of RC. I can post hundreds of photos documenting the event (which I do) and we can shoot countless videos of all the flightlines (which we do), but even after looking at all of that, I still don’t think you will be prepared for what you will experience. The main flightline is covered with Giant Scale aircraft. The lake is an endless parade of giant water aircraft tracing lines on its glasslike surface.

The electric flightline has grown each year, and I predict that it will soon be the biggest area at the Joe Nall venue. The 3-D flightline is a nonstop, action-packed, smoke-filled bastion of amazing flying.

Bring a chair, plenty of water, sunscreen, and something that can transport you around the hundreds of acres of pure RC fun. Did I mention that you have to attend this event?




Joe Nall Week is an event that every RC pilot should attend.


The Horizon Hobby AeroTow

This event keeps getting bigger every year. You get to meet ambassadors of the hobby, such as Peter Goldsmith and David Payne. The real thrill is seeing the big towplanes dragging up even cooler sailplanes.

This year’s event will be held June 16-19 in Monticello, Illinois. There really isn’t anything else like it in the country. If you are into sailplanes, it is a must-see!


The Heli Extravaganza

If you are into helicopters, head to the Triple Tree Aerodrome, in Woodruff, South Carolina, for this all-heli event.

The staff is welcoming and works hard to make this fly-in better each year. Steve Rogers is at the heart of the show and makes sure everything goes off without a hitch.

I want to point out that Tim King Jr. is in charge of the FPV quadcopter flightline. It’s not just helicopters anymore! If you are into FPV, you can race, compete, and meet some of the biggest names in FPV there. This year’s event will be held September 22-25.


The NEAT Fair

The Northeast Electric Aircraft Technology (NEAT) Fair is a great one in the lower New York state area. It’s all about electric flight, and creativity seems to reign. You will see different types of airplanes, but the same kind of people: RC fanatics!

This event takes place in the beautiful Catskill Mountains. The dates are September 15-18. Tell Tom Hunt that Jim T. sent you!


WATTS over Owatonna

I have been typing the name of this show for years and I still don’t say it right! This July 21-23 event is located in Owatonna, Minnesota, at the Southern Minnesota Model Aircraft Club field. Approximately 200 pilots attend, so this is a big one! Many big-name vendors will be there, and the flying never stops!


Ready Made RC FPV Fest

FPV is alive and kicking! Ready Made RC hosts an FPV-only event in Willard, Ohio. Slots are limited, but here is the best part: If you’re not flying, you can still slip on goggles and take a ride in any of the FPV aircraft in the air.

Events such as this allow you to virtually ride along with other pilots. It’s like NASCAR for the RC crowd! The dates this year are September 8-11.




Get your FPV on!


Other Great RC Events (Bonus content)

These are just a handful of the outdoor events that occur across the US. There are many more out there. I bet there is one not too far from you, so hit the Web and search for the type of event you would enjoy. It could be a fun-fly, such as the gathering that I hold in Nashville each year, an International Miniature Aerobatic Club competition, or a simple swap meet.

I feel that I need to also mention some of the indoor activities held annually.


The Toledo Show: R/C Model Expo

This is usually my first show of the season. This year it is scheduled for April 1-3. The sun is still not blazing at this point, but heading to Toledo, Ohio, will give you a good idea of what’s about to be released by our favorite RC manufacturers.

Be sure to bring some cash because there are things you will want to buy. My tip is to purchase what you want when you see it. Some vendors sell out of everything on the first day!


AMA Expo

Here is an event for those on the West Coast. AMA holds an annual convention in January each year in Ontario, California. Check out new and cool products at the booths. There are guest speakers, exhibitors, an AMA membership meeting, a swap shop, a static competition, and more!




On the West Coast, check out AMA Expo in Ontario CA. Photo by AMA staff.


E-Fest

E-Fest is hosted by Hobbico in lovely Champaign, Illinois, at the University of Illinois Armory. This event is held in February each year and offers great indoor flying.




Hobbico’s E-Fest offers great indoor flying. Photo by AMA staff.


Horizon Indoor Electric Festival

Terry Nitsch is the commander and chief of this event, held in the “foamie dome” (Four Seasons Golf Dome), in Columbus, Ohio, in November. Check out the new products from Horizon Hobby and see some innovative models flying around. The Combat event is also an awesome spectacle.

This year’s Horizon Indoor Electric Festival is November 4-6.

People who are just as passionate as you are about the hobby are out there putting these things together so folks can enjoy them and spread the word about RC. Seek one out and maybe I’ll see you there!


Sources:

SEFF
www.seffweek.com

Joe Nall Week
www.tripletreeaerodrome.com/joe-nall-week.php

Heli Extravaganza
www.tripletreeaerodrome.com/heli-extravaganza.php

NEAT Fair
www.neatfair.org

WATTS over Owatonna
www.wattsflyin.com

Ready Made RC
www.readymaderc.com

The Toledo Show: R/C Model Expo
www.toledoshow.com

E-Fest
www.hobbico-efest.com

Horizon Indoor Electric Festival
www.horizonindoor.com

AMA Expo
www.amaexpo.com




Magic in the Soaring Community

$
0
0


Brayden Chamberlain, holding his newly acquired Experience Pro, along with many of the generous pilots who helped him, at the Tangerine Soaring Championships.

Written by Gordon Buckland
RC Soaring column bonus content
Read more about RC soaring in the March 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


I would like to report on something magical that happened in the Florida Soaring community. Dillon Graves (F3K Junior World Champion) recruited a 13-year-old school friend, Brayden Chamberlain, to come to a local Soaring contest to watch us fly.

We spoke with Brayden and his father, Doug, about the potential for Brayden to learn Soaring with the Orlando Buzzards Radio Control Soaring Society. Brayden was an accomplished electric-powered aircraft pilot and was interested in sailplanes, but Doug expressed concern that the high cost of the models would probably prohibit his entry in Soaring.

We put the word out to local aeromodeling clubs, and within days a local Soaring pilot, John Kennedy, offered to donate an RTF Experience Pro that he wasn’t currently flying. We decided to surprise Brayden by having it ready to fly at the Tangerine Soaring Championships. John Graves donated a used transmitter and receiver and the model was prepped and ready to present to Brayden at the contest.

Club members decided to test-fly and trim the model before Brayden arrived on Saturday morning. Then the unthinkable happened. After a few minutes in the air, with trimming done and flight modes tested, the model inexplicably dove out of control into the ground and was destroyed. To say we were shattered is an understatement.

When Brayden arrived, we had to explain to him what happened. It was in that moment of gloom that magic happened. Buddy Bradley said he had a similar Experience Pro for sale, which he would sell to Brayden for a reduced price of $500.

At the pilot’s meeting, we explained what had occurred, and asked all of the contestants if they would each be kind enough to donate $10 or $20 to replace Brayden’s model. Within 10 minutes, a bunch of generous pilots had donated sufficient funds and the model was purchased.

Brayden flew it for the first time after the event and has since been out to fly with the Orlando Buzzards. He competed in his first Soaring contest at Christmas, Florida, where he achieved some great maxes and landings in windy conditions.

I am proud of the community that we are part of, with so many pilots ready to step up and support yet another Junior getting started in our hobby. Thank you to the entire Tangerine pilot group for your wonderful gesture. You are part of RC Soaring’s future.

Watch this column for more about Brayden’s progress as we train him.
Go downwind and soar.


Sources:

LSF
www.silentflight.org

Team USA F3J
www.teamusaf3j.com

Orlando Buzzards
www.orlandobuzzards.org




I Am the AMA - Bob Hunt

$
0
0


Written by Jay Smith
Bob Hunt: CL World Champion, author, and designer
Extended interview from the March 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


JS:How did you get involved with model aviation?
BH: My father, James A. Hunt was a modeler since the mid-1920s, so for me it was a case of osmosis. Nearly everyone my father knew was a model enthusiast, and modelers were a constant presence around the Hunt household. The likes of Leon Shulman, Fran McElway, Larry Scarinzi, and the legendary Harold “Red” Reinhardt were regulars in my dad’s shop. In fact, I was around six years old before I fully realized that not everyone in the whole world flew model airplanes!

My first real modeling experience is one that I don’t even remember. Dad was a member of the Exchange Club in New Jersey in the later 1940s, and he ran many of the club’s sponsored meets. One of the events at those contests was “Youngest Contestant.” Dad entered me in that event at one of those meets in 1949, and, as the story goes, held in my father’s arms I flew a 1/2A CL training plane the requisite number of laps without any assistance and won the contest.

Who did I “beat?” In second place was Don Shulman, son of modeling icon, Leon Shulman. Don was two years old at that time, so I beat him by two months of age! Our families still laugh about that story.

With such amazing CL fliers as Larry Scarinzi and Red Reinhardt a constant source of inspiration, it is little wonder that I eventually gravitated toward CL Combat and Aerobatics (Stunt) flying.



JS:How has model aviation impacted your life and/or career?
BH: Model aviation has been my life. Sure, I have other interests, but model airplanes, model airplane flying, and especially associations with other modelers has been the focus of my existence since I was a youngster.

There have been landmark points in my modeling life that have helped set career paths. The first of these was when I read the article in the June 1964 issue of Model Airplane News by Ed Izzo and Ray Olsen that was entitled “STYROFOAM Giant Step Forward.”

In that piece Ed and Ray shared pertinent information about how to make the equipment required to hot-wire cut expanded polystyrene foam (EPF), and detailed the procedure used to blank, spur, cut, and core foam model airplane wings. I must have read that article a hundred times!

In approximately 1967, my father and I were discussing the possibility of cutting our own foam wing cores. Dad, who was a talented automation machine designer and was well versed in electrical componentry, built the power supply. It featured a two-stage transformer controlled by an industrial grade variac. It is still my primary foam-cutting power supply 50-plus years later!

I built the bows that were required, found a source for high-quality virgin bead foam, and our experiments started. I blew a bunch of foam panels before perfecting the technique. Soon I was producing light and accurate foam wings, and all of my friends wanted me to cut their wings. It was a case of either going into business cutting wings for profit, or going broke giving out wings. I opted to start Controlline Specialties Company (CSC).

CSC was an immediate success and the word spread to the RC community about my products. At that point I incorporated and changed the name of the company to Control Specialties Corporation to reflect the fact that I would make wings and products for all aspects of the hobby/sport.

I spent much of the 1970s cutting thousands of foam wings for modelers worldwide, but also for several kit manufacturers, as well as a few that were used as wind-tunnel test wings by Lockheed and McDonald Douglas.

I also tackled some really unusual projects for Mississippi State University and Rensselaer Institute. The students at Rensselaer were attempting to win the Kremer Prize by being the first to fly a man-powered airplane across the English Channel. The needed an accurately cut, lightweight propeller made from foam. It was certainly a challenge to cut a propeller with the correct helix with a hot wire, but I was able to satisfy them.

In 1978, I was fortunate to go to England with the US F2B World Championship Team and I won the gold medal. Bill Hunter at Satellite City heard that I built a significant portion of my Genesis model using his Hot Stuff CA adhesive. He asked me if I would consider appearing in his ads in the major modeling magazines. I agreed and he told me to send a photo of myself and my winning model along with a brief testimonial about the Hot Stuff adhesive.

He arranged for me to go to the Flying Models (FM) magazine offices and have editor, Bob Hoeckele take the photo. Bob told me that FM was looking for an associate editor and I got the job.

A year after I started working for FM, Bob left Carstens Publications and I was promoted to the editor’s position. I stayed there for 17 years.

Around 1995, I started my own video production company under the name Robin’s View Productions. I produced a number of modeling how-to video programs, all of which are still available today.

I also restarted the foam wing business as a part of Robin’s View Productions. In fact, I’d pretty much kept the foam wing business going off and on part time while I was engaged full time as an editor.

In 2001, I was contacted by Rob Kurek, AMA’s Director of Publications, who asked if I might be interested in interviewing for the position of Aeromodeling Editor of Model Aviation magazine. I got the job and served in that post for the better part of seven years before retiring. I acted as an advisor/consultant for several more years. Nowadays I write the CL Aerobatics column for Model Aviation, and also serve as the editor of Stunt News, the 100-page official newsletter of the Precision Aerobatics Model Pilots Association, the AMA officially recognized CL Stunt Special Interest Group.

Through Robin’s View Productions, I’m now dedicated full-time to producing foam components, fully sheeted wings, built-up wings in my Lost-Foam Wing Building System, and other custom work.



JS:What disciplines of modeling do you currently participate in?
BH: Nowadays I still fly competition CL Aerobatics, but at the 2015 Nats I announced my retirement from Nats Open competition. I’m dealing with a number of back-related health problems and will not be able to maintain the practice regimen required to be competitive in that arena in the future. I fully intend to fly locally for as long as I’m able, and I may dabble at the Nats in Classic Stunt and Old-Time Stunt. I’m also anxious to get back to doing some RC flying. In the 1980s, I competed a lot in the Advanced class in RC Pattern.



JS:What are your other hobbies?
BH: I started riding motorcycles in the late 1960s, just after I served in the Army. I even went to the Woodstock Music Festival on a motorcycle! I raced bikes in sanctioned competition for a few years and then stopped riding for several years. I returned to the sport a while back and bought a Suzuki Hayabusa, which was the world’s fastest stock bike at that time. I also purchased a BMW K1200 LT Custom and with that bike my wife, Marianne, and I did some long-distance touring with some close friends. Great times!

In 2001 I became a RiderCoach for the Pennsylvania Motorcycle Safety Program, and went on to become a Site Coordinator for the program and a PA State License Examiner for motorcycles.

I’ve always had a love of music and started playing guitar around 1969. I also dabbled with playing organ, trombone, drums and even violin, but the guitar was it for me. That’s not to suggest that I’m any good at it! Actually I’ve play mostly for my own enjoyment over the years, but have played out at gigs from time to time. Lately I’ve learned to Travis Pick (think Chet Atkins-style playing, although I’ll never approach anywhere near the level he played at), and it has changed my life. I’m learning at an accelerated rate from a great teacher, and I’m having a ball doing it.

A hobby related to both music and model airplane building that I’ve begun recently is building acoustic guitars. My friend, Jeff Traxler, is an accomplished luthier, and a fast-rising CL Stunt flier, and he’s been helping me to learn the trade of guitar building while I’ve been helping him learn the lessons of Stunt.

Currently I’m building two guitars; one is a replica of a Martin D-28 and one is a replica of a Gibson J-200 Jumbo. I’ve found that the requisite skills required to build stringed instruments are similar to those required to build model airplanes. Fortunately, most of the tools are also transferrable.



JS:Who (or what) has influenced you most?
BH: That would be a long list of people! I’d list my father first, of course. Beyond him the biggest influences when I was young, as mentioned earlier, would have to be Larry Scarinzi and Red Reinhardt. After I actually learned to build and fly at a higher level my influences came mainly from Bill Simons and Gene Schaffer. Once I became an established Stunt flier, I learned from the master himself, Bill Werwage.

To be fair, however, I learn from almost everyone I meet. All modelers have something to offer and all have good ideas that are worthy of my attention. I could list all of my influences, but the list would take up many pages in this magazine!

Above all who have influenced me is my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Without him I am nothing.



JS:Of all of your aeromodeling accomplishments, what are you most proud of?
BH: That’s an easy one—the development of what I call the Lost-Foam Wing Building System. In the late 1980s, I started thinking about a way of constructing a built-up wing that had the accuracy of a properly cut foam wing. Foam wings are great and have many attributes, including easy and quick assembly, durability, ease of finishing, and the aforementioned accuracy. But, they are somewhat heavier than a built-up wing of the same size. Hey, foam, glue, and balsa weigh more than air!

I knew there was a way to incorporate foam into a fixture in which a built-up wing could be made. It dawned on me that the shucks, or cradles, that are left after cutting a foam core are just as accurate a negative representation of the wing shape as the core is a positive.

In 1990, it hit me. If I were to cut a foam wing blank and loft the desired rib positions for a built-up wing on the blank both front and back, and then cut the wing panel, I could transfer the rib positions onto the core’s surface, label them, and then cut the core into sections at the rib stations, yielding templates with which to generate perfectly accurate balsa ribs.

In turn, I could then draw the planform of the wing into the lower cradle half and build the wing in a perfect form-fitting fixture. The result was a method of building wings that ensures that the outside shape would be perfect, and one in which no internal stresses would be built into the structure. Many fliers use this method to build their competition CL Stunt wings, and two of them have won World Championship titles and multiple National Championships using Lost-Foam built-up wings.

The only regret I have about that system is the name I gave it. Lost-Foam is really a misnomer; none of the foam components of the system are destroyed, and the fixtures can be used to build multiple wings of a given design. I’m strongly considering changing the name to Foam-Form Building.

If anyone reading this would care to see more about this building system, I have a four-PDF set that serves as a detailed building manual. It is free of charge and all I require is to have an email sent to me so that I can respond with the files. My email address is robinhunt@rcn.com.




Paul K. Guillow, Inc.

$
0
0


Written by Don DeLoach
Ninety years of model aviation
As seen in the April 2016 issue of
Model Aviation.


Share Your Favorite Guillow's Model

Upload a photo of your favorite Guillow's model and tell us a little about it. We'll include your photo and description in an online gallery!


Submitted photos

Thank you to everyone who has helped us celebrate Guillow's 90th anniversary by uploading a photo an a short story. We've enjoyed reading them and are excited to share! Click each photo to see a larger version and read what the owner had to say about the model.


Celebrating Guillow's 90th Anniversary




A name synonymous with stick-and-tissue model aircraft for generations, the Paul K. Guillow company in Wakefield, Massachusetts, is celebrating 90 years in business in 2016. The company was originally founded by Paul Guillow (rhymes with willow) in 1926 as NuCraft Toys.

Born in 1893, Paul Guillow was a World War I naval veteran who brought home from Europe an abiding love for the burgeoning technology of aviation. Paul founded his aviation-themed toy business at the perfect time: one year before Charles Lindbergh ignited a worldwide craze following his 1927 transatlantic solo flight. Paul seized on this event by introducing his successful card game, The Lindy Flying Game.

NuCraft’s first model airplane product was a line of small balsa static models of combat aircraft flown in the war. Another shift followed when Paul recognized a high demand for flying models, and expanded the line to Free Flight (FF) rubber-powered scale and glider kits.

In 1933, Paul moved the expanding company from his barn into the present headquarters on Salem Street in Wakefield, a hamlet approximately 12 miles outside of Boston.

In the 1940s, Paul—by then an expert on model aircraft—wrote several books, including Tom’s Book of Flying Models and Flying Models: How to Build Them. Paul died in 1951, but the company continued to thrive under the leadership of his widow, Gertrude. For 35 years Guillow’s was family-owned and operated, until it was finally transferred to an Employee Stock Ownership Plan, with annual revenues between $3 and $5 million as of 2010.




The board game, Crash The New Airplane Game, was released by NuCraft Toys in 1928. NuCraft Toys ended in 1933 when the company name was changed to Paul K. Guillow, Inc.





Paul Guillow was a naval veteran of World War I who brought home from Europe an abiding love for the burgeoning technology of aviation. Photo courtesy of Guillow’s.





Tom’s Book of Flying Models and Flying Models: How to Build Them were written by Paul Guillow. These copies are part of the National Model Aviation Museum’s collection. Photo by Jennifer Alderman.


Most Guillow’s kits are old-fashioned balsa and tissue, just as they were 80 years ago. Plastic propellers, vacuumed-formed spinners, and molded canopies were upgrades in the 1960s, but since then, little has changed. Most kits are scale models in the 16- to 35-inch wingspan range and most are designed for FF.

Guillow’s is proud to use plantation-grown balsa imported directly from Ecuador, and the company is quick to note that the harvesting process is kind to the rain forest. It is also proud to state that all of its products (except for a small foam helicopter toy) are made in Wakefield.

By the mid-1990s, Guillow’s was gobbling up its competition, acquiring Tiger, Inc. in Los Angeles and Comet of Chicago. Tiger was a leader in promotional flying toys imprinted with company names and graphics; Comet was a direct competitor in balsa kits and gliders.

Guillow’s is still on Salem Street in Wakefield. The factory complex has gradually expanded, but today continues to use many of its original Depression-era tools. The recent upgrade of a laser cutter has brought Guillow’s kits into the 21st century. Now the balsa parts are accurate and true-fitting, making the kits easier to build.




The author’s Guillow’s PC-6 Porter, which was reviewed in the October 2013 issue of Model Aviation.





Simple balsa models such as this Jetfire gave many children their first model airplane experience.





In 1933, Paul Guillow moved his expanding company from his barn into its present headquarters on Salem Street in Wakefield MA, a hamlet roughly 12 miles outside of Boston. Photo courtesy of Guillow’s.


As every model builder knows, balsa airplane models are fragile. For some they are too fragile—thus, they fail to deliver on expectations. This infamous 1959 letter by disgruntled customer Robert Higgins still hangs in Guillow’s Wakefield office:

“I have bought one of your fifty cent planes, and it broke as soon as it left the ground. If you don’t make your rotten fifty cent plane better, my friends & I won’t buy your planes anymore. I think you have the lousiest planes from the lousiest wood (please take this as an insult): drop dead.”

Maybe poor Robert was ham-handed, or didn’t have a good mentor, or both. Now, in 2016, Guillow’s has 69 stick-and-tissue kits in its catalog and several dozen slide-together flying toys. Many of the designs are unchanged from 50-plus years ago, save for laser-cutting upgrades and other small tweaks.

A few surprises have been revealed in the 2016 catalog, including some new designs capable of contest-winning performance, and some static models (even jets) that offer jaw-dropping realism.


Speaking with an experienced Guillow's builder

Mitch Schoonejanes,
of Seattle, has been an enthusiastic builder
and flier of Guillow’s kits since the middle 1960s.

Don DeLoach:When did you get into model building?
Mitch Schoonejanes: When I was about 10 years old. I’m now 59, so that’s almost 50 years!

DD:What drew you to Guillow’s?
MS: My dad was an airline pilot, so I was always fascinated by airplanes. I built plastic airplane models before age 10, but always yearned for a flying model. Then I saw my first Guillow’s kit in the local drugstore. It read, “Flying Model Kit.” I was mesmerized!

DD:What was your first Guillow’s kit?
MS: An S.E.5a, from the 100 series 18-inch World War I fighters. The 100 series is now discontinued, but the models can be found on eBay. I bought mine in about 1966 for $1 at the drugstore.

In 2015, I realized a dream when I flew that S.E.5 successfully in the Western Flying Aces (WESTFAC V) competition in Arizona. As a kid I had always dreamed about flying my S.E.5 against the Germans and their Fokkers. Of course, as a kid, I didn’t have the skills to make the S.E.5 fly very well.

DD:What’s the best-flying Guillow’s model you’ve built?
MS: The 500 series 161/2-inch wingspan kits build light and fly well for lots of pilots, but they aren’t particularly scale in shape. I prefer the 400 series, which are all 1/16 scale. I’ve built them all at least once.

My Focke-Wulf 190 did 28 seconds at the recent WESTFAC V. It is now retired and proudly hangs in a hobby shop near my home in Seattle. Lately I’ve been building from the 1000 series, lightened up, with half the wing ribs. Guillow’s bills these large kits as “Multipurpose.” Designed in the 1960s, these models were really for the small Cox glow engines of the time. My 1000 series Hellcat did 24 and 27 seconds at WESTFAC V. I was very happy with that!

DD:How many Guillow’s kits have you built throughout the decades?
MS: Over the years, probably at least 25, and maybe as many as 50. I’ve built many of them over and over again.

DD:You build on a ship in the middle of the North Pacific Ocean? Tell us how.
MS: I wanted to be a pilot but had bad vision, so I joined the Merchant Marine. I pilot 700-foot ocean vessels carrying freight of all kinds from Seattle to Alaska. There is no trucking to Alaska, so the people rely on ocean freight for their groceries and other products.

Our shipping voyages are 9 to 12 days, and I get 8 hours off for every 4 hours I work, so I have free time to build models!

I build directly on a steel desk, holding down the parts with magnets. I’ve built six Guillow’s planes on the ship over the last few years. It’s an awesome way to pass the time on the ship.

—Don DeLoach
ddeloach@comcast.net


Sources:

Paul K. Guillow, Inc.
(781) 245-5255
www.guillow.com



Viewing all 1312 articles
Browse latest View live